Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Karl Shuffler
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jul 15, 2015 12:13:24   #
Karl Shuffler wrote:
My camera is a product made with the combinations of other parts, made collectively equal camera. My camera therefore, is a product made. That product is designed to collect images by recording light by each click one takes,(by taking one's finger pressing on the shutter button). There's nothing made,but taken,(taking a camera to take photos). However, to make a photo,would to make a product. To view your images that were taken to be printed, now we have a product. That image,(photograph), was made from the result of taking something to make something else. With the combination of products made,(ink jet printer, ink, paper and computer; a product is made to be viewed by all who look apond that printed image; a photograph is made by that combination of mention products made by industrial manufacturer. That photograph was made by your camera in which you took that started the process. You shouldn't take for granted all the parts in your camera, but make a effort to do your best at taking great images to make great (printed) photograph you took with the camera of choice. Enjoy!
My camera is a product made with the combinations ... (show quote)


The camera makes the image you took. You make the photograph you have printed.
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 09:51:16   #
My camera is a product made with the combinations of other parts, made collectively equal camera. My camera therefore, is a product made. That product is designed to collect images by recording light by each click one takes,(by taking one's finger pressing on the shutter button). There's nothing made,but taken,(taking a camera to take photos). However, to make a photo,would to make a product. To view your images that were taken to be printed, now we have a product. That image,(photograph), was made from the result of taking something to make something else. With the combination of products made,(ink jet printer, ink, paper and computer; a product is made to be viewed by all who look apond that printed image; a photograph is made by that combination of mention products made by industrial manufacturer. That photograph was made by your camera in which you took that started the process. You shouldn't take for granted all the parts in your camera, but make a effort to do your best at taking great images to make great (printed) photograph you took with the camera of choice. Enjoy!
Go to
Jul 11, 2015 19:35:11   #
Nobody is ugly ....... Some are just........ Misfortunate.
Go to
Jul 11, 2015 17:05:40   #
Time for a small upgrade, meaning you can buy use. Results speaks for itself. For me; I got The Sony DSC-W300 some time ago and not for sale nor a need for a replacement, its that good. This small marvel includes optics of Carl Zeiss and to mention, a must have view finder. Having a sensor of 13.6 Mp is ideal for prints if desire of 8x10 easily. You can get one for less than $130 used off eBay. Great for portraits too. You be the judge. Taken of cruise ship in the Bahamas and a portrait.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Great Choice

(Download)
Go to
Jul 1, 2015 02:21:06   #
Contax RTS III,Zeiss 300/4 film... two pics blended into one. Palacio de Bellas Artes, Mexico City.


(Download)
Go to
Jul 1, 2015 02:02:23   #
Having a reason for a particular system can be sound. I too started with the Minolta SRT-101. Ending the Minolta line with the 9Xi. A friend gave me a Contax 159mm as time went on, it was the Zeiss optics I fell in love with. Seem to be a class of its own. The reason for moving up to Contax RTS III even tho not having auto-focus capabilities it didn't matter. Even so; there are times auto-focus can play a role, (let say action), that manual can miss; so went on to Nikon. Why Nikon? With the use of the "F" mount, one can use any Nikkor lens dating back to and including 1959. This give the user the most selection of optics of all systems, even today. Manual or auto-focus. Film or digital. Therefore a sound reason for Nikon. Why Canon? Remember my love for Zeiss optics? With the proper adapter, I can once again use those c/y mount optics with the Canon FE mount. For me ....... Sound reasons. See pics

Canon 6D with Zeiss 180/2.8

Go to
Jun 28, 2015 10:39:17   #
I'm certain if this accord any where near area 51, same story would prevail., camera or no camera.
Go to
Jun 22, 2015 20:48:28   #
America is a free country..... The government does what ever if wants ..........freely.

Government: "There should be separation of Church and State."

To separate from church is to separate from God.
No God.....No God's law. Making laws without God.

In God We Trust?

One nation under God?

Go figure.........
Go to
Jun 22, 2015 18:38:35   #
The difference in cameras should not be measured by size of sensor, but rather the size of pixels as to its' size times the number there of equal the needed size of sensor for that size pixel. Therefore a ff camera having 16Mp. compared to a crop frame camera having 24 Mp has much large size pixels. What does this mean? Having larger protons collects more light, collecting more light allows for capabilities to have higher ISO. Making it perform better in low light. Better performance and better picture in such situations. Pixels are not jammed in full frame compaire to crop. However if different sensors and having the same count would be a more of fair comparison. There is also a difference between full frame lens vs crop lens as well. Glass definitely makes a difference due to the amount of glass being used. To see the difference will be more evident in enlargement, for as you enlarge, pixels enlarge with it. No planning to enlarge, you will not tell except camera performance capabilities. This would be true also with having more pixels. Why do you think pro cameras have medium count of pixels count? Better camera performance. Better in low light, higher ISO, great for more shots per second. Pictures may not look better, but you'll be able to get shots that crop sensor just.missed.
Go to
Jun 16, 2015 09:41:35   #
Correct; adding any converter will bring out more of the same plus increasing the shutter speed will be needed to control camera shake; diminishing the results. Questioning correct exposure on sunny days can be simplified with the use of f/16 sunny rule.see: www.slrlounge.com/photography-essentials-the-sunny -16-rule/

Or in your search type: sunny f16 chart, for more information relating to this rule. I use this ruling many times when exposure is questionable, it works. Try it at lease in those questionable times. Hope information I send you helps. Practice, practice, practice.
Go to
Jun 15, 2015 17:06:30   #
It's not your country; you just live here. If I had a boat.........I would leave.
Go to
Jun 15, 2015 16:56:32   #
Twice the expense. When the Air Force One is added to the President's fleet, a duplicated one is added to the fleet as well; as a decoy.
Go to
Jun 15, 2015 16:00:58   #
According to dpreview testing Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 DiVC USD lens, the sharpness is at 150 mm, and progressively decreases as you zoom, by 600 it isn't sharp at all.This is what I suspected to be the problem as well as being 6.3 wide open at 600. Only because you have higher ISO levels will allow better usage at such large apretures. Therefore if better sharpness is an objective, better glass is your only option with such range. At a level of 600 mm., a 300/2.8 plus a 2X converter would be that better option, if your wallet permits. As to the Sony A500, like anything in the real world when buying, you get what you pay for.That being said, considering what was use in the results, you did great. The first system, even before AF lenses I was involved with Minolta system. From SRT-101 to and including Minolta 9Xi I had a collection of Minolta mount lenses which included, third party lenses. So some time back I bought the Sony A-350. Two reasons for that purchase was, put back to use those Minolta mount lenses and second the discontinue price I paid. Good pictures were made, but never great ones I get with higher cost lenses, and more advanced camera being offered today. However; with the camera you do have using,better glass,will make your photo shine better than ever. Choice between spending money for either new camera vs better glass? Having limit funds; do so with glass. It's the glass that makes the difference, between the two.
Most camera most of the time represents more bells and wissels. Even then back in the heydays of film better glass by Minolta made a difference. That ruling still applies. Take what you have and learn all you can about the following: f-stop, shutter speed, ISO setting, white balance, compensation, lighting, photographic equipment, but most of all. Practice, practice, practice. The more bad photos one takes, the more good ones are acquired. Hope this helps as to happy shooting.

Forgot to mention having a crop sensor increase the good, the bad, and the ugly in ones photos. When shooting with any lens handheld, that shutter speed should be at or faster than the focal length being used. Therefore if at 600mm. x 1.5 = 900mm. Then one should shoot at 1/1000 sec. Or faster.
Go to
Jun 15, 2015 11:09:54   #
Needed information..... Camera and what lens?
Go to
Jun 15, 2015 07:04:31   #
Sorry for the misspelled word within second sentence. Should of read.......... And the feel of the RTS not fell of. Sorry, did try to change, but to no avail.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.