You are presuming that Hillary was totally unaware of the most startling allegations leveled against Trump during the entire 2016 e******n season, namely the Steel Dossier. Yes, of course we all believe you.

Amen!!

1,400 people prosecuted out of 12,045 incidents of civil unrest and 633 r**ts is not very many. Many stores were l**ted by close to 1,000 people at a time.
https://thefrontierpost.com/study-up-to-95-percent-of-2020-u-s-r**ts-are-linked-to-black-l***s-m****r/#:~:text=It%20is%20pervasive%20in%20the%20summer%202020%20protests.,Of%20these%20violent%20incidents%2C%2084%20percent%20involved%20B*M.

He already answered it a couple of pages ago. You can guess what it looked like.

Interesting that you would refer to me as a troll when I am the only one on the thread who was asking questions specifically pertinent to the post.

Well, there you have it folks. I ask a simple serious question, no snark, no rancor, and that's the reply that I get. I might as well be talking with a doorknob. Okay, that's about it for me now. Good luck! As Mike Gallagher says, Keep up the good fight!

Okay Mr. Dirt, here's a serious question. Why did the title of your post claim that Jim Accosta takes down Tucker Carlson and then you never mentioned either of them in your post or your comments? What were you referring to?

I get kind of befuddled when liberals who seem outwardly like they are trying to convince you of their way of thinking, or want to convey some important information to you, then suddenly clam up and you can't get them to talk if their life depended on it. I once tried asking Dirtman a few serious questions years ago and I couldn't get single serious reply. Just spits and spurts of his usual incoherent blabber, if he would answer at all. I'm convinced that some people on this site are simply here to throw insults and vent because they don't have anything better to do. Actual discussion is not an option for them. That's okay. To each his own, but that's why I seldom visit this site anymore.

Can you imagine a Jehovah's Witness showing up at your door, eager to spread the Gospel. When you ask him to explain he says "Go look it up yourself!"

Ya know, being a conservative I actually like giving people answers to political questions. I've learned long ago that getting a straight answer out of a liberal can be like pulling teeth. They love spouting hyperbolic statements and calling people names but they rarely ever discus things.

Look, I asked a simple question about this post that is titled "Jim Accosta Takes Dowm Tucker Carlson: Ukraine Needs Allies, Not More Lies." Dirtman's post then goes on to say something vague about Putin's lies and excuses for invading Ukraine.

Never mentions Accosta. Never mentions Carlson. So I ask what do Accosta and Carlson have to do with this post? Simple question. Dirtman ignores the question totally and you at least provide a partial answer (which I give you credit for), by saying "Tucker Carlson is parroting Putin's talking points to justify Putin's GENOCIDE in Ukraine!" which at least answers the Carlson part. Being that it sounds mighty outrageous for Tucker Carlson to be advocating genocide in Ukraine, I ask "Oh, then what did he say?" and I further inquire about Jim Accosta's role in this.

Instead of actually telling me what he said, or even a fraction of what he said, or even a talking point, you tell me to go look it up myself. Figuring that the Carlson quotes must not be all that important for you to tell me, I prod further in hopes that you can tell me something. You reply that you don't even listen to Carlson and that your opinion had been based on other people's responses to him rather than actually hearing or seeing a quote.

So fine, I figure there must be nothing there as is often the case and I tell you that I don't feel like hunting down some quote that I figure doesn't even exist from a guy I don't listen to myself. I also figured that if you really wanted me to know what he said, you would tell me or provide a link to his supposed advocating of genocide. You, apparently irked by my lack of curiosity, continue to prod me into doing research for you in order to back up your own claim which I don't feel like pursuing.

I've already figured out by your responses that Carlson really didn't say anything that bad, because with all the time you took to respond multiple times by calling me lazy and exhorting me to "look it up for myself," you could have easily provided the key quote. I don't go around making startling claims to other people and then tell them to go find out if it is real or not. That would be preposterous.

You gave me a link to a Google search page. You keep calling me lazy and you can't even bother to hit two buttons to select a site or quote for me to read. Why are you even communicating? I still say you're making the whole thing up.