Yes I did however I am also aware of how the truth is frequently glossed over in press releases for upcoming devices.
The article did promt me to do a little more research and what I found out is that the 200mp is effective pixels of the single senor.
https://semiconductor.samsung.com/image-sensor/mobile-image-sensor/isocell-hp1/
However this is through pixel binning which just takes the actual 50 mp image sensor and splits each pixel into four pixels which while technically gives 200 mp the pixels are much smaller.

But it is a lot easier to estimate that you are five feet away from the subject than to have to factor in that at f 1.8 the depth of field at five feet is going to be about three inches actually in focus.
The footage is a lot more forgiving as for guessing.
Especially since the calculator gives the range of in focus.
It's been working for me for the last few years without precise figures.
But you stick to what works for you and I'll be busy capturing images instead.

Thank you for your comparison and insight.
I don't use any efs lenses very often but you did provide useful information.

I'm mainly interested in the photo than video since I seldom shoot video but I've always used manual focus for the times I have.
Eventually I want to get a few good video lenses for the camera since I know what it's capable of since a previous owner actually used it for video in both his studio and for the latest movie he did .
Granted it was a low budget flick but it was still decent video quality.

Guestimate but like I said that's why I have the calculator for dof .
In my case it's mainly so we can get the best depth of field while still making the best of the available lighting.
This is useful for candid event photos which is my main specialty.
I do the candids while my wife does the posed shots.
Our clients really like the fact that they get both.

Because they want to use the logic of,
"Just because it happened in the past it's ok."
Of course that only applies to the things that they support.

The 200mp is actually because of composite images from the multiple smaller cameras on it.
This is not unusual for phones like that.
My phone has multiple cameras and combines for 64 mp and the image is no better than the individual 12 mp camera since the composite primarily just enlarges the image.

It looks like one of the projects from a company called animax based in Nashville they make numerous animatronic dinos.
I had the fortune of being Santa Claus for an Instagram post a few years ago with a baby dinosaur.

(Download)

If you are going to put an m.1 mount drive in an enclosure you will likely have to have an m.1 to Sata adapter card which is readily available but be sure the enclosure is sufficiently cooled or well ventilated since the typical m.1 drive runs quite warm.
First time I adapted one to recover data from the password protected drive before doing a clean windows installation.
I literally burned my fingers touching the drive.
The reason I had to do this was because my stepson who owned the laptop passed away and his mom inherited it and wanted to get any pictures off of it if possible.
I was using an old PC as a file and print server mostly due to the fact that it lets the entire household access the files much like a network attached storage array.
Another advantage of the setup was that I had the operating system installed on a virtual drive on the system which isolated it from the actual files and acted like an additional layer of malware protection (A necessary precaution with multiple teens living at home).

I'm more concerned with the depth of field since I can see the field of view easily.
For the depth I have a dof calculator on my phone.

I've been a long time Canon user and I like the lenses I have.
I have recently bought a Sony a7rii for which I got a good deal.
I'm wanting opinions from others who actually use Ef lenses with an adapter for the Sony Fe mount.
Which adapter do you use and why do you prefer that one?

I'm actually wanting to get a reply from User ID since they actually use an adapter to put Canon lenses on their own Sony.
I can find all kinds and prices online but I'm wanting to find someone else who actually uses the product they are suggesting and not just saying it is better because it costs more.

Probably so but I currently have several thousand dollars in Canon l class lenses which is why I was asking the other person who has several Canon lenses which adapter he was using

What part of my reply about having several Canon bodies and numerous lenses along with my asking for an ef to fe mount adapter led you to believe I was trying to adapt Nikon lenses?

Might I ask what adapter you are using to adapt the ef lenses to the Sony.
I just recently got a Sony a7rii and I have a good assortment of Canon lenses and want to use them.