Blurry, why do you bother? This is trash, entirely trash, and you participate.

Trump is dirty, profoundly dirty, and it is so obvious I can’t believe you deny it. He’ll get off easy—presidents always do, to save the nation from trauma, but he’s dirty, seriously dirty, and he’s going down.

First off, he is mentally unstable. You’ve seen the cabinet masturbate him in public, then Pence kissing where they worked.

D********g.

He has profoundly damaged the party, and Mueller hasn’t spoken yet. And he is a dirty, slimy New York thug, vicious to the end, dishonest, incompetent, bought and paid for by a few streams of urine, a few prostitutes, sexual aggression, and stupidity raised to a grandiose level.

Abandon him, blurry, abandon him or pay the price. He stinks, and the stink worsens.

Abandon all hope, ye who refuse to abandon him now.

What have we come to as a country when it is OK to call for the purging of rank and file government employees based upon their political leanings? So we are now to purge people based upon which party is in the WH? Really? Does this not sound like a third world nation tactic? Good God we can't be this crazy that such statements have any real thought behind them. Jail or purge your opposition? Seriously people this can not be America.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/366476-gop-lawmaker-calls-for-purge-of-fbi

You conservatives, always ask the question, then reun before the danger of an answer is advanced.

Why don’t you put up a thought, an idea, put something on the table instead of the old ‘ask and run?’

I see no reason to relitigate Whitewater and such thinks of the past.

I like you assertation that Trump is guilty only of winning, when he didn’t win the popular v**e, and Vladimir Putin pushed him through the e*******l college. He has plenty of crimes to answer for, and he will.

Actually, that smarmy comment is not like you.

I put the facts out as I know them; are there parts you disagree with? If so, publish them - I answered your question. Your admonishment about "cut and paste" is disappointing. FYI - I'm well aware of the requirements of "peer review publications"... it was not cut and pasted.

I'm not the one in denial here.... I am on record as saying I want the professionals to conduct their investigation and will accept the outcome regardless of the report findings. I'm being objective about this, are you?

This post is complete insanity, absolute, uneducated and possibly dishonest insanity. The Russians were massaging the e******n before the dossier became known.

The dossier was republican funded, then abandoned and taken up by the Clinton campaign as opposition research.

The FISA court had acted sometime before the dossier—possibly as far back as a year ago last July, when a task force began investigating.

No one ever said that the Russians changed the results of the e******n, just influenced it; they did not change v**e totals.

It is a crime to interfere with e******ns, particularly so for foreigners to do so, and more so for Trump to cooperate with a foreign nation to contaminate a national e******n.

Clinton did Not fund a f**e dossier on Trump. Steele is an experienced and respected intelligence agent, now in business in the same field, doing intelligence investigations for private clients. He is very good at it. As I said before, Clinton took over an abandoned study and funded its completion for opposition research—a perfectly normal and acceptable activity.

The f**e dossier was NOT used to get the FISA court involved, even though the FBI validated parts of it.

I don’t know that Comey leaked the dossier; can you document that?

We do not know that Trump didn’t commit a crime, and actually I think he did, and I think it is established. At any rate, Mueller will find out, as his instructions demand.

“However, there are more than one investigation going on and we are finding out that the highest levels of the FBI and the DOJ is an anti-Trump cabal. They are certainly not the cool, detached professionals we always pictured the FBI to be; they are a virulent biased gang of thugs with a badge.” This is complete balderdash. There are two congressional investigations going on, about to be torpedoed by congressional Republicans. FBI agents are under no compulsion to be naive and ignorant about politics; they are allowed to contribute, to v**e, and to have political opinions. These think have nothing to do with an investigation—an investigation led by a republican, by the way. It will be up to the courts to decide upon the validity of any evidence produced, and that decision will be advanced by a formal ruling, in writing, subject to review and appeal.

Don’t worry your baby curls about the integrity of the process; things like this happen everyday, and the process, while not perfect, has a sound reputation for reliability.

And... if you were Mueller, you would not be the i***t you prove yourself to be. He will end the end the investigation when he feels it is complete, and no plane trip out of town will be necessary.

This post is complete insanity, absolute, uneducated and possibly dishonest insanity. The Russians were massaging the e******n before the dossier became known.

The dossier was republican funded, then abandoned and taken up by the Clinton campaign as opposition research.

The FISA court had acted sometime before the dossier—possibly as far back as a year ago last July, when a task force began investigating.

No one ever said that the Russians changed the results of the e******n, just influenced it; they did not change v**e totals.

It is a crime to interfere with e******ns, particularly so for foreigners to do so, and more so for Trump to cooperate with a foreign nation to contaminate a national e******n.

Clinton did Not fund a f**e dossier on Trump. Steele is an experienced and respected intelligence agent, now in business in the same field, doing intelligence investigations for private clients. He is very good at it. As I said before, Clinton took over an abandoned study and funded its completion for opposition research—a perfectly normal and acceptable activity.

The f**e dossier was NOT used to get the FISA court involved, even though the FBI validated parts of it.

I don’t know that Comey leaked the dossier; can you document that?

We do not know that Trump didn’t commit a crime, and actually I think he did, and I think it is established. At any rate, Mueller will find out, as his instructions demand.

“However, there are more than one investigation going on and we are finding out that the highest levels of the FBI and the DOJ is an anti-Trump cabal. They are certainly not the cool, detached professionals we always pictured the FBI to be; they are a virulent biased gang of thugs with a badge.” This is complete balderdash. There are two congressional investigations going on, about to be torpedoed by congressional Republicans. FBI agents are under no compulsion to be naive and ignorant about politics; they are allowed to contribute, to v**e, and to have political opinions. These think have nothing to do with an investigation—an investigation led by a republican, by the way. It will be up to the courts to decide upon the validity of any evidence produced, and that decision will be advanced by a formal ruling, in writing, subject to review and appeal.

Don’t worry your baby curls about the integrity of the process; things like this happen everyday, and the process, while not perfect, has a sound reputation for reliability.

And... if you were Mueller, you would not be the i***t you prove yourself to be. He will end the end the investigation when he feels it is complete, and no plane trip out of town will be necessary.

It is not a simple question as you well know.

The Special Prosecutor's investigation is the result of a long term pattern of suspicious behavior taken by Trump and his associates. Initially the concern focused on the meetings between Trump representatives, (notably Flynn at that point) and Russian representatives as high as Russia's Ambassador Kislyak. There were many meetings from the time preceding Trump's announcement to run for President up to and past his inauguration which caused an escalating concern over the influence Russian operatives were having / had on the e******n. As concern about these meetings escalated, and concern about Flynn's integrity grew, Trump met privately with Comey in which the president reportedly said, "I hope you can let this go." Comey and others felt Trump's intercession was damned close to an attempt to obstruct the investigation into Flynn's activities.

On March 20, 2017, during a public hearing with the House Intelligence Committee, Comey publicly acknowledged that the bureau is investigating whether there was collusion between members of Donald Trump's campaign and Russia. Within two months, on May 9, 2017, Trump fired Comey. The next day Trump met with top Russian diplomats in the White House, during which he reportedly revealed classified information. According to a later New York Times report, the president also told them that day, "I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off."

This created a firestorm within Congress and there were calls for a Special Prosecutor's investigation. Trump has not been accused of any crime (to the best of my knowledge). Trump's OWN ADMINISTRATION appointed former FBI director Robert Mueller as special counsel to lead an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 e******n.

In total, the behavior of Trump operatives over a span of the primaries to now were of such concern that members of his own party called for a Special Prosecutor because they felt there was sufficient cause to investigate creditable allegations of involvement of a foreign power interfering with the e******n.

I hope that answers your question.