Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: fotogk
Page: <<prev 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 next>>
Dec 9, 2011 08:04:52   #
If you do not register your work then it is not important to put copy right since you will not really have a chance to win a law suite if some one takes your work. Water marks unfortunately are very easy to remove unless they are put in a place that and are so large that they distract from the pic. Registering with the copy right office is very easy cost 35.00 I believe it is a couple thousand images, upload as jpg and you have so many sessions to upload your images. The difference is, if some one takes your image and you go through a lawsuit it is a slamdunk you get paid
Go to
Dec 8, 2011 09:39:15   #
Chevy wrote:
which photoshop are you using. On mine I have a layers pallete over on the right side of the edit screen. One should have the background and the other of the crop you are adding to the new background. You highlight the one you want to work on. After you finish editing them you click on the down area and flatten to merger all layers together.


Which response are you referring to
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 16:55:49   #
tripsy76 wrote:
I would agree with fotogk. The best way is to shoot. Whenever I invest in a new piece of glass, I'll poor thru every copy in the store until I find one that I'm 100 percent happy with. Sigma's newer lenses have produced some awesome results, and for those with crops, the 30mm prime is said to be one of the best primes to fit. I tried a few, and for photography the lens was awesome. But for video, it had a few issues, so I went with the Canon 28 f1.8 instead ( which is awesome ). I couldn't afford a nice "L" series, or piece of Zeiss glass until I had brought in a few clients but I still had to find a way to get started.
Today, I am madly in love with my 70-20 f2.8. I use it more than my Canon (don't tell!)
Good luck!
I would agree with fotogk. The best way is to shoo... (show quote)
nice 2.8 I am also working on some nicer glass
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 15:19:31   #
Eugene G Campbell wrote:
Would you rate the Sigma 150-500mm equalivant or sharper than the Tamron 200-500mm. I've been considering the Sigma for sometime now. Thanks, Gene C.

go to a camera shop shoot both on a number of different subject then check on your monitor and have a could of prints made
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 10:00:54   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I had a Sigma 28mm-80mm zoom back in the 70's that now resides at the bottom of Yellowstone lake after filling with moisture on a foggy morning. Poor sealing has been a problem with them for many years, but their higher end lenses are quite good. I also have a Sigma 400mm APO F4 that I have carried for over 20 years and it is an EXCELLENT long lense for wildlife work, and is well sealed against moisture from my experience. I also have a couple Tokinas, buy their "Gold" trimmed lenses, not the cheaper "Red" trimmed ones and you will do good with them too. I have no Tamrom experience but have seen good as well as poor quality from them in the lenses used by others around me. Even the lenses from Nikon and Canon came in varying degrees of quality.
An old adage: "Your don't need to buy the best there is, but buy the best you can afford." Follow this simple rule and you will have a great time with your photography as well.
I had a Sigma 28mm-80mm zoom back in the 70's that... (show quote)

Glass has come a long way since the 70's, in the 70 most of the third party glass never gave you a sharp image. Most of the glass from third party is pretty good. If you can afford nikon or camera glass it is better (sealed and sharper) but pricer
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 08:03:48   #
Bruce with a Canon wrote:
I used a 70-300 Tamron, it did a fine job.


I have the 28 - 300 great lens
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 07:56:54   #
Fran wrote:
Thanks all! It sounds like lightroom is for me!


Good luck with lightroom once you start feeling comfortable with lightroom and want to expand on keywording check out www.laurashoe.com site she post some great stuff.
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 22:47:42   #
Check out squarespace, easy to use, professional looking, can handle an extremely large hit load, auto modification when viewed from mobile device,
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 22:02:00   #
see if you can set a feather for the lasso by selecting the lasso tool then look at the menu area to set the feather. Another way is to make your selection then go to menu > selection > feather. the larger the feather the softer the edge. Hope this helps
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 08:50:42   #
LR is more then a basic editing program and a very powerful cataloging program. You will probably be able to do 95% of what you will need and for that 5% check out photoshop elements
Go to
Dec 5, 2011 16:53:04   #
crop in camera means placing your self, zoom lens in a position that everything you see in the view finder you will want to include in the picture. This is a good method to use so that very little needs to be crop in pp. A great deal of people do not use this because they are to lazy to move closer to subject. Another thing to keep in mind is not all view finders show exactly what will be recorded. If you look at the spec about your camera it can tell you if the viewfinder shows 100% of the recorded image
Go to
Dec 5, 2011 13:36:16   #
I have both on both platforms since I teach it. Most Photographers will only need elements. All the nik, topaz filters work with both. The only real difference I have run into in photography usage is layer masks. PS has a button that can add a layer mask to any layer, while elements does not have that ability. There are work arounds to accomplish this ( extra steps). since I use layer masks all the time ps is my main program for this type of editing. For organizing and doing a great deal of editing on I actually use lightroom people here will tell you that it does basic editing, they do not understand how to use the program. I do 90% of my editing in lightroom then switch to ps when i need layer masks, then back to lightroom since it has better sharpening and output
Go to
Dec 5, 2011 10:01:19   #
I had the d70 move to a d5000 then to d300s. the 5000 is a nice upgrade a lighter camera
Go to
Dec 4, 2011 19:11:34   #
I had a 20 mac workstations, then two Imacs set up to epson printers, had 20 digital camera d40, d3000. class size was not bigger then 20. Juniors and seniors only plus film camera
Go to
Dec 4, 2011 18:38:49   #
I found I very rarely retired assignments just added and pushed them more especially with digital since they did not have to print all the assignments. I had each one get a flickr account and submit their work in a private group only other students in the class could see what they where submitting. I also made them submit slide shows of their images before post processing. Assignments given beginning of semester so they could shoot head. Slide shows for tha weeks assignments due in class wednesday (showed the slide show on wednesday) assignments due on friday. Students could work on editing at home since most had pirated copies of ps.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.