It would depend on the agreement. I would assume most transactions of this sort would be a direct transfer of files without prints. This would allow the model to apply retouching and enhancements as they so-like after review. However if you the photographer want your byline attached, you may want to do the processing yourself to ensure artistic integrity. But without copyright protection and a written agreement (including a model release allowing you to use the files as you choose) the end user could do anything they want to alter your images. If that is your concern I would recommend giving the model finished prints with your watermark applied.
Delderby wrote:
The greatest photographers don't need Photoshop.
Well I guess we’ll need to demote virtually every photographer that ever shot B&W or color negative film out of the greatest category because they used a photoshop/darkroom to alter their photographs. 🤦♂️
Greatest design year for the GTO. Every year went downhill from there.
He’s not too old for you 🤪 Yes that was a great album. What ever happened to him?
I see no mayonnaise? 🤪 fun shot, well done
One thing is for sure about smart phones; they are indeed smarter and more intelligent than DSLR and Mirrorless cameras in their auto modes. Camera manufacturers should take note and build similar in-camera processing capabilities for those that don’t care to learn advanced photo techniques. Coupled with superior optics and resolving power, camera manufactures could possibly slow the tide, but I doubt it.
Great! Tom bad I missed it.
20th century’s greatest power couple. Thanks for sharing.