CHG_CANON wrote:
LOL
Talk about someone who thinks they know everything. Very UHH, welcome back to the community full of these types!
BTW - What is now LR Classic started back in 2007 as LR1. It really started to get good around v4 in 2012. I've never personally moved on from LR6 that still operates on Win10/11, dating back to 2015. The current subscription model, and the variety of flavors and mobile platforms, dates only to 2017.
I haven't touched the 'newest' Adobe Camera RAW, not being a subscriber to the current updates. What I do know of the software is that it is a cruel joke when compared to Lightroom Classic. From the earlier back n forth, LR may be everything that ACR is, but it doesn't go the other way; ACR is not even close to everything that LR is. ACR is so incomplete and cumbersome, the comparison is laughable, a cruel joke ...
So, the proper phrasing of the earlier statement is:
When you understand Lightroom, you understand the plethora of things that you can do better and faster than trying the same thing in ACR & PS. You understand when to expend the extra effort to work in PS for the relatively few images where this time and effort is needed.
LOL br br Talk about someone who thinks they know... (
show quote)
I am not surprised you don't about ACR, you are using LR6. That is 8 years old. Adobe products, LR, PS, Bridge and ACR have come a long way in the past 8 years. Maybe if you upgraded, you would be able to see more clearly.
***I haven't touched the 'newest' Adobe Camera RAW, not being a subscriber to the current updates.****