Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Travel Camera Dilemma
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Mar 5, 2019 06:36:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
billnikon wrote:
I put it in a belt pouch so I am hands free.


That's the best way to travel.

https://smile.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-HX99-Compact-Digital-Touchpad/dp/B07JGKL1Y6/ref=sr_1_3?crid=28Z1HGHRW1AKS&keywords=sony+hx99+digital+camera&qid=1551785796&s=gateway&sprefix=sony+hx%2Caps%2C142&sr=8-3

I had an HXxx with GPS a few years ago, but I returned it because the GPS didn't work well.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 07:34:35   #
knessr
 
Wingpilot wrote:
I know I've posted before that we're going on a cruise in October, up the east coast from Boston, terminating at Montreal. I don't want to lug my A6300 and lenses, at the same time not wanting to mark myself as a potential victim of theft by the camera slung over my shoulder. So here's the dilemma: What do you veteran cruisers recommend for a compact travel camera? (yes I asked before). Is 200mm enough zoom or should I look at something longer. Something longer would have the 1/2.3" sensor in order to get the reach, but I could get 200--250mm zoom and a 1" sensor in a compact. This is driving me crazy. I've done enough researching online to know the strengths and weaknesses of both, but I'd love a good recommendation, as I have no idea of what is adequate for this, not having done a cruise before. Thanks for your indulgence and patience with me.
I know I've posted before that we're going on a cr... (show quote)


I'm on my third cruise using my Canon EOS M3 mirrorless 24mp with the APS-c sensor and love it. I have a range out to 200mm and that has been adequate for me in Australia, New Zealand, Alaska and now Mexico. With the 200mm on it, the camera and lens weighs 1 1/2 pounds. And I have the adapter also so I can still use my close-up from my DSLR.

It is a great system for me.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 07:51:13   #
SonyBug
 
Wingpilot wrote:
I know I've posted before that we're going on a cruise in October, up the east coast from Boston, terminating at Montreal. I don't want to lug my A6300 and lenses, at the same time not wanting to mark myself as a potential victim of theft by the camera slung over my shoulder. So here's the dilemma: What do you veteran cruisers recommend for a compact travel camera? (yes I asked before). Is 200mm enough zoom or should I look at something longer. Something longer would have the 1/2.3" sensor in order to get the reach, but I could get 200--250mm zoom and a 1" sensor in a compact. This is driving me crazy. I've done enough researching online to know the strengths and weaknesses of both, but I'd love a good recommendation, as I have no idea of what is adequate for this, not having done a cruise before. Thanks for your indulgence and patience with me.
I know I've posted before that we're going on a cr... (show quote)


Wingpilot, I would not consider an a6300 to be much to lug. I carried an 18-105 with a a6500 and the photos were superb, and the rig was not heavy. As far as theft, you are not going to a third world country, not even as rough as Wasilla here. So, just carry the camera on a strap like I do all over the world. Insure your gear, through a good carrier like State Farm and you will be good to go. BTW, I take 2 to 3 cruises a year and have stopped carrying tele lenses. They just dont get much use on a cruise. Have fun...

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2019 08:23:36   #
mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma
 
Instead of the pro, rent the 14-150 f/4-5.6 II. You’ll get more reach, it’s weather sealed (used it outside on Maid of the mist at Niagara Falls), and the image quality is excellent. P.s. if you go this route, just know that you press the OK button and tap on a setting you wish to change. I used to be a Nikon shooter but this combo works so much better for me.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 08:52:39   #
Lagoonguy Loc: New Smyrna Beach, FL
 
I have been lucky to have cruised much of the world and I recommend a small camera with a modest telephoto lense. I have toted the large kit and the small and in the end the small telephoto is stress free and will fit in the cabin safe. An additional wide angle fast lense would be handy if you are traveling to scenic cities and perhaps will be visiting cathedrals and other interiors where often no flash is permitted. I now use M4/3 but your Sony would be just fine. In past years I have also used a Nikon D7000 with an 18-200 3.5-5.6 with a Tokina 12-28 f/4 and was very happy with the results. That kit was larger than I prefer now but it worked well. My larger D750 and heavy Sigma Art lens took great pictures but they are just not necessary because the experiences of the trip are why you are on the cruise and not the photography. Use your cell phone for photos when inside the ship and for food shots. Happy cruising.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 09:01:22   #
charlienow Loc: Hershey, PA
 
jcboy3 wrote:
I bring the good stuff whenever I travel. I see no point in having good gear if I'm not going to use it.


totally agree. have traveled in u.s, Canada, Mexico, Europe, Africa and enjoy the trip and photos...i have a strap with wire thru it so it is supposed to be cut proof...i remain aware of my surroundings (with or without camera) and dont drink heavily...

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 09:20:49   #
Mama Bear984 Loc: Langley, BC Canada
 
I wouldn’t worry about us Canadians we don’t bonk people over the head & steal their cameras.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2019 09:30:57   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
Wingpilot wrote:
Thanks. If I decide to take that camera, maybe I'll get either the Sony 18-135 or 18-200, although I understand the Tamron 18-200 in Sony E mount may be a better lens than the Sony one.


Sony has 3 different 18-200 mm lenses. One of them (not sure which) has always been suspected of being a rebranded Tamron. They are all big and heavy and expensive. The e-mount 18-70 mm is a Zeiss lens priced at $900. If you can afford it go for it.

I have been using my A6000 and 18-105 G OSS on all of my trips for the last several years and find that combo covers all of my needs. I usually bring my Rokinon 12mm f2.0 with me but leave it in the room unless I know I am going to be taking some interiors or night shots. I will also bring the kit 16-50 when I want something to fit in a jacket pocket - you will need a good jacket in the NE in October. If I could only bring one lens it would be the 18-105. However, I handled the 18-135 ($500) on a A6000 in the store last weekend and I am tempted to get it for its lightness and compactness - only 4 oz lighter than the 18-105 but that is a big difference.

I wouldn't worry about being robbed on your trip. Nobody is going to snatch your camera in Boston and you will be even safer as you head North. Of course, it is likely that there will be folks on your cruise that come from out past Worcester so I can't vouch for them. All in all, it is much more likely that your A6300 will be robbed from your house while you are away than being robbed on your trip.

Enjoy the trip and post pics when you get back.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 11:23:12   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Flash Falasca wrote:
leave the camera home, just buy some post cards !!


Really.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 11:23:54   #
rcarol
 
bsprague wrote:
"It just doesn't have the reach for some of those longer shots from onboard the ship."

Do look at the Panasonic ZS100 or ZS200. It has the zoom and sensor to go well beyond the phone. The Panasonic phone app is pretty good and adds to the experience.


I second the ZS100. It is a great camera and will serve you well on a cruise. I bought mine to use on vacations and have no regrets.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 11:26:13   #
charles tabb Loc: Richmond VA.
 
Wingpilot wrote:
I know I've posted before that we're going on a cruise in October, up the east coast from Boston, terminating at Montreal. I don't want to lug my A6300 and lenses, at the same time not wanting to mark myself as a potential victim of theft by the camera slung over my shoulder. So here's the dilemma: What do you veteran cruisers recommend for a compact travel camera? (yes I asked before). Is 200mm enough zoom or should I look at something longer. Something longer would have the 1/2.3" sensor in order to get the reach, but I could get 200--250mm zoom and a 1" sensor in a compact. This is driving me crazy. I've done enough researching online to know the strengths and weaknesses of both, but I'd love a good recommendation, as I have no idea of what is adequate for this, not having done a cruise before. Thanks for your indulgence and patience with me.
I know I've posted before that we're going on a cr... (show quote)


My answer is different from anyone else.
Personally I have and use a Sony RX-10 IV.
Take the time to look into it.
I also bought a book from Gary L. Friedman which helped me imencemently.

I know that I will get called down here, but I have found that it covered just about every condition that I encounted when I went to Switzerland last year.
Just give the spects. a look-see.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2019 11:32:39   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
jerryc41 wrote:
My travel camera is an A6000, but I never considered it luggable. Sony makes some very small decent cameras. I have a WX9 that fits into a belt case. Canon has several nice compacts - the Elph series.


I looked at the Canon G3X, but it's not pocketable, and it's a bit spendy. The one I've considered is the G7XII, but it lacks a viewfinder and only zooms to 100mm, although it has a fast f1.8-2.8 lens and a 1"sensor. I haven't looked into the Elph series.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 11:33:27   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
charles tabb wrote:
My answer is different from anyone else.
Personally I have and use a Sony RX-10 IV.
Take the time to look into it.
I also bought a book from Gary L. Friedman which helped me imencemently.

I know that I will get called down here, but I have found that it covered just about every condition that I encounted when I went to Switzerland last year.
Just give the spects. a look-see.


"My answer is different from anyone else. Personally I have and use a Sony RX-10 IV."

You are right. That is (perhaps) the best fixed lens travel camera if you don't mind the bulk. The only point of the belt pouch, pocket or purse cameras is that you can put them somewhere besides around your neck.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 11:36:21   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Mama Bear984 wrote:
I wouldn’t worry about us Canadians we don’t bonk people over the head & steal their cameras.


Heh, heh! 👍🏻👍🏻
We like Canadians. Been up and down the Alaska Hwy numerous times and it was always a good experience.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 11:37:33   #
rusty66
 
I did that cruise many years ago on a Navy destroyer. The river is absolutely beautiful. Plan on spending a lot of time outdoors enjoying it.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.