Do Heavier (metal) lenses - provide GREATER stability, or do they actually create instability?
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
RichardTaylor wrote:
Not a windbreaker - wet weather gear.
If you are shooting for a "client" it matters.
I love shooting some subjects in the rain.
Ah, yes … love to hear the pitter-patter of rust-causing rain on my heavy metal and glass lenses …
Can't get ENOUGH of it, Richard ….
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
RichardTaylor wrote:
They were not all zooms.
Ah, I see … got a few metal primes in there, too, didya?
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
Grahame wrote:
Really ?
Is this more heresay and guesswork from you or do you have any factual evidence and examples to support this?
Next time I get blown from one hill to another, I'll make sure I have someone standing by, to shoot me - ok?
`
Mary Poppins vs The Flying Nun
Can hardly wait to see next year's version of this .....
.
Chris T wrote:
Actually, Grahame … I know this from my own experiences. If you use a plastic long lens in bad weather, and a wind comes along … you will go flying
Strange, having followed and participated in a number of photography forums and read lots it's surprising that I have never heard this happening to others.
I wonder why?
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
Grahame wrote:
Strange, having followed and participated in a number of photography forums and read lots it's surprising that I have never heard this happening to others.
I wonder why?
Dunno, Grahame … perhaps, you don't get around much …. ?
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
User ID wrote:
`
Mary Poppins vs The Flying Nun
Can hardly wait to see next year's version of this .....
.
Very picturesque, I'd say, USER ID ….
Chris T wrote:
Ah, yes … love to hear the pitter-patter of rust-causing rain on my heavy metal and glass lenses …
Can't get ENOUGH of it, Richard ….
You have no idea.
If you are prepared the rain doesn't fall upon the lens, or body.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
IMHO the most important issue here is balance.
If you use a 300/2.8 or even a 80-200/2.8 metal lens with a super-plastic DSLR you will have balance issues that would be far less on a metal bodied DSLR.
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
RichardTaylor wrote:
You have no idea.
If you are prepared the rain doesn't fall upon the lens, or body.
Not if you use a hood on it - no, it doesn't fall on the glass. But, it still falls on the barrel.
And, usually - when it rains - it's overcast, so using a hood, is unnecessary, and may inhibit light gathering.
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
LWW wrote:
IMHO the most important issue here is balance.
If you use a 300/2.8 or even a 80-200/2.8 metal lens with a super-plastic DSLR you will have balance issues that would be far less on a metal bodied DSLR.
That's for sure, huh, LWW? …
Now, then … let's see … "a super plastic DSLR" … you mean like the new Nikon D7500, LWW???
Chris T wrote:
Not if you use a hood on it - no, it doesn't fall on the glass. But, it still falls on the barrel.
And, usually - when it rains - it's overcast, so using a hood, is unnecessary, and may inhibit light gathering.
Not if you have protection like these guys.
A well designed hood doesn't inhibit light gathering.
In daylight, even when it is raining, there is usually plenty of light around to capture the action.
This is from personal experience.
Have you ever photographed in the rain?
Chris T wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've never used the Wizard of Oz analogy, before, and that - alone - makes this post a little different than ones I may've done in the past.
Yes, the Wizard of Oz reference is new. And yes,
just that alone goes a long way toward giving this a folksy little touch and spontaneous feel. When doing market research it is important to see if consumer attitudes have changed over time, of course, so you are obligated to ask the same question repeatedly. Disguising what you are doing is important. But it is, as you say, an age old question that is of interest to people, so I will play along.
Given the choice of Dorothy, lions, scarecrows, tin men, and yellow bricks, I am going to say that the yellow bricks are the least likely to blow away in the wind.
Jan 29, 2018:
It's an age-old argument, isn't it - do heavy lenses (and cams) actually create stability, or do they bring their own kind of instability?
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-510655-1.htmlFeb 20, 2019:
Do Heavier (metal) lenses - provide GREATER stability, or do they actually create instability?
It's an age-old argument, isn't it?
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-579468-1.htmlIf it walks like a duck...
Mike
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Chris T wrote:
That's for sure, huh, LWW? …
Now, then … let's see … "a super plastic DSLR" … you mean like the new Nikon D7500, LWW???
Is the D7500 plastic?
One more reason I like my metal framed D7200.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.