Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Considering micro 4/3
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Nov 20, 2018 16:21:00   #
wildweasel
 
Dr_B wrote:
I purchased an Olympus E-M1MKII slightly over a year ago to go along with my well-accessorized Canon 5D MKII and Leica-Q. My reasons were similar to yours. I cannot speak to the specific models you mention. Having said that, I have many of my images printed 11 x 19 at high resolution, and to my pleasant surprise, the results using the M4/3 format have been so good that I sold all of my Canon gear. Sometimes I use the Hi-Res option with a tripod but many times not. The stabilization of the E-M1MKII is outstanding and the images I have captured in low-light without a tripod is comparable or better to my prior full frame Canon when being handheld at various ISO settings. As long as one keeps the ISO of the Olympus at or below 400, I doubt you will be disappointed. I frequently use the full frame Leica Q for landscapes but it has a fixed wide angle 28mm lens which can be limiting. Hope this helps...Cheers...Jack
I purchased an Olympus E-M1MKII slightly over a ye... (show quote)


I agree, I was shooting a Nikon D 750 and I switched to an Olympus EM 1 Mark ll almost 2 years ago, it is a fantastic camera. Go here and compare the images at 1:1 ratio. You will be amazed. https://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM?fbclid=IwAR37YhlhBviX0oRkGqeKuF-XQdnrfrSq8r4kqoFN-xyQK7KGcvQafOq73A4

Reply
Nov 20, 2018 17:44:19   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
tdekany wrote:
I’m sorry, but you can get blown highlights with ANY camera. Color is subjective but there is nothing wrong with Panasonic colors. It maybe the operator not the gear.


More likely the settings of the viewfinder than the operator. He should try matching the settings to what they want picturewise.

Reply
Nov 20, 2018 19:28:22   #
jburlinson Loc: Austin, TX
 
fetzler wrote:

I am considering the Olympus Pen F and the Lumix GX9.

I would like your thoughts on micro4/3 and the relative merits of the two cameras.

I'm a big fan of mft, having used the OMD E-M-5 (original) ever since it was introduced. Of your two choices, I would recommend the Pen F for the following reasons:
1. It 's smaller. This may be splitting hairs, because the G9 is no behemoth, but with the high-end lenses, the G9 is not far from dslr territory when it comes to size.
2. If you shoot jpg, the Pen F has remarkable profiles that equal fuji, in some ways.
3. If you use the right lenses, the Pen F will enable "sync is" which combines the IBIS in the camera with the IS in the lens to give unbelievable output handheld at slooooow shutter speeds, even >1 second. An example of such a lens is the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f4.0 PRO, which, when mounted on the Pen F, will give you 6.5 shutter speed steps compensation at 200mm (35mm equivalent).
4. Pen F is cheaper.

Downside -- Pen F is not weather sealed, G9 is. Could be a deal breaker depending on how you like to shoot.

For macro photography, whichever camera you choose, consider the Olympus MSC ED M. 60mm f/2.8 maco. Fabulous lens.

As for me, I'm waiting for my Em- 5 to wear out. It 'll probably be a long wait.

Reply
 
 
Nov 20, 2018 21:58:38   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
fetzler wrote:
I am considering adding micro 4/3 to camera equipment. I have a Nikon D7200 and several lenses and am satisfied with the Nikon system.

The purpose of adding micro 4/3 is to

1. have a lightweight camera for travel especially when photography is not the main purpose.

2. macro photography. A number of excellent macrophotographers are using micro 4/3.

3. An articulated viewfinder/screen. Yes I know the D7500 and D500 have these.

I am considering the Olympus Pen F and the Lumix GX9.

I would like your thoughts on micro4/3 and the relative merits of the two cameras.
I am considering adding micro 4/3 to camera equipm... (show quote)


Also try the Lumix G9 and G85. THEN try the OM-D E-M1 Mark II.

Reply
Nov 20, 2018 23:24:56   #
Naptown Gaijin
 
I studied the available models for a long time before making my choice. Cost was not a factor. Weight, features, and quality were. I picked the Panasonic Lumix GX9. It can do almost anything the othr models can, and has some unique abilities no other camera has. I refused the kit lens and got the 12-35mm (24-70mm equivalent in 35mm format) f2.8, and the Nocticron 42.5mm (85mm in 35mm format) f1.2 lens. Also just bought the Pany 100-300mm (200-600mm equivalent in 35mm format) f2.8-4.0 for long shots. GX9 is not weathersealed, its only downside. Otherwise, I love it. Spend some time doing your research on DPreview, photo life, and other websites.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 01:42:53   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
I studied the available models for a long time before making my choice. Cost was not a factor. Weight, features, and quality were. I picked the Panasonic Lumix GX9. It can do almost anything the othr models can, and has some unique abilities no other camera has. I refused the kit lens and got the 12-35mm (24-70mm equivalent in 35mm format) f2.8, and the Nocticron 42.5mm (85mm in 35mm format) f1.2 lens. Also just bought the Pany 100-300mm (200-600mm equivalent in 35mm format) f2.8-4.0 for long shots. GX9 is not weathersealed, its only downside. Otherwise, I love it. Spend some time doing your research on DPreview, photo life, and other websites.
I studied the available models for a long time bef... (show quote)


There is no 100-300 f2.8-4.0

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 05:46:57   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
tdekany wrote:
There is no 100-300 f2.8-4.0


I wish there was ;-)

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2018 07:47:00   #
j.l.h
 
I have a MFT system for the same reason - easily portable. I've owned the GX7 and now have the GX8. I bought the body with two primes; 20mm f1.7 and 45mm f2.8. I expanded the kit with a 12-35mm, 35-100mm and a 100-300mm all f2.8. I can fit most of this gear in a small shoulder bag that doesn't scream "camera equipment inside" and if I'm hiking in for more than 5 miles this is the way to go. I have a lightweight, compact travel tripod with a Markins ball head. If I load all the gear, add filters, the tripod, water and snacks my pack is close to 20 pounds about half of what I have for my full frame camera.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 09:22:31   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
j.l.h wrote:
I have a MFT system for the same reason - easily portable. I've owned the GX7 and now have the GX8. I bought the body with two primes; 20mm f1.7 and 45mm f2.8. I expanded the kit with a 12-35mm, 35-100mm and a 100-300mm all f2.8. I can fit most of this gear in a small shoulder bag that doesn't scream "camera equipment inside" and if I'm hiking in for more than 5 miles this is the way to go. I have a lightweight, compact travel tripod with a Markins ball head. If I load all the gear, add filters, the tripod, water and snacks my pack is close to 20 pounds about half of what I have for my full frame camera.
I have a MFT system for the same reason - easily p... (show quote)


My Panasonic G3 + 35-100 G Vario f4-5.6 weighs 20 ozs, and my G5 + 14-45 G Vario f3.5-5.6 weighs 22 ozs.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 11:33:20   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
I wish there was ;-)


Olympus is suppose to be bring out a 150-400 f4 this coming year. If it is anything like the 300, it will be incredible - and expensive. But it probably will be handholdable and as sharp as a lense can possibly get.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 11:48:41   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
j.l.h wrote:
I have a MFT system for the same reason - easily portable. I've owned the GX7 and now have the GX8. I bought the body with two primes; 20mm f1.7 and 45mm f2.8. I expanded the kit with a 12-35mm, 35-100mm and a 100-300mm all f2.8. I can fit most of this gear in a small shoulder bag that doesn't scream "camera equipment inside" and if I'm hiking in for more than 5 miles this is the way to go. I have a lightweight, compact travel tripod with a Markins ball head. If I load all the gear, add filters, the tripod, water and snacks my pack is close to 20 pounds about half of what I have for my full frame camera.
I have a MFT system for the same reason - easily p... (show quote)


Your 100-300 is not f2.8

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2018 14:29:27   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
I studied the available models for a long time before making my choice. Cost was not a factor. Weight, features, and quality were. I picked the Panasonic Lumix GX9. It can do almost anything the othr models can, and has some unique abilities no other camera has. I refused the kit lens and got the 12-35mm (24-70mm equivalent in 35mm format) f2.8, and the Nocticron 42.5mm (85mm in 35mm format) f1.2 lens. Also just bought the Pany 100-300mm (200-600mm equivalent in 35mm format) f2.8-4.0 for long shots. GX9 is not weathersealed, its only downside. Otherwise, I love it. Spend some time doing your research on DPreview, photo life, and other websites.
I studied the available models for a long time bef... (show quote)


Kudos on your lens choices! The 12-35mm is my most used lens, and the Nocticron is drool-worthy. But that's a 100-300mm f/4 to f/5.6. I WISH they made an f/2.8-f/4!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.