This 1968 photo was shot on a Leica with the 21mm on Tri-X and now scanned with some color added I think it's rather pleasing to the eye. Any thoughts about having one foot in analogue with the other in digital. I might add my original wet print made on Kodak fiber Polycontrast does have a tiny bit more feeling of depth than the best I've been able to accomplish with the best Epson has to offer as pure b&w.
Thanks!
"Any thoughts about having one foot in analogue with the other in digital".
I do it all the time. Nothing wrong with that.
--Bob
Crombie wrote:
This 1968 photo was shot on a Leica with the 21mm on Tri-X and now scanned with some color added I think it's rather pleasing to the eye. Any thoughts about having one foot in analogue with the other in digital. I might add my original wet print made on Kodak fiber Polycontrast does have a tiny bit more feeling of depth than the best I've been able to accomplish with the best Epson has to offer as pure b&w.
Thanks!
Indi
Loc: L. I., NY, Palm Beach Cty when it's cold.
A good picture is a good picture. That’s a good picture!
Thanks. For myself I'm appreciating the disciplines needed for shooting and processing film and then enjoying digital pp, and I find myself being far less inclined drift away into the la la land of photoshop. Having said that I do like to experiment with all the software but I do find myself returning to the honesty associated with analogue.
Each to their own in this marvelous world of photography!
Thanks for your kind comment! I'm gradually learning that less is often better than more, as in PP.
chase4
Loc: Punta Corona, California
Great photo, I like it. chase
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.