Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Macro lense
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 4, 2018 07:14:00   #
vista
 
I currently use a Nikon D7200 and am looking for a macro lense recommendation. Does anyone have opinions on the Tokina 100mm f/2.8 AT-X AF pro D Macro? Appreciate any input. Thank you

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 07:19:53   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
I would recommend the Nikon 105mm f2.8, though a full frame lens on your Nikon D7200 (I have the same camera and lens) it will give you a crop factor of 157mm which is a good lens combo for photographing insects without scaring them.

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 07:44:40   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
You will be hard pressed to find a macro lens that doesn’t deliver.. yeah, some may test out better but most of those tests are bench tests and you won’t come anywhere near the results in real world shooting. Unless you intend to use a macro for other than macro shooting, AF and VR aren’t needed and are ineffective at at macro distances. I shoot my macro ( my niche) with a D7100 and an older 105 mm MF macro lens. I do have 8 different AF and MF macro lenses from 55 to 180mm. Most responses you will get will tout whichever macro lens the responder uses. Shorter lenses will put you right on top of your subject, making lighting difficult and scarring away many insects. Longer focal lengths get you farther away but at the expense of being more costly and bulky, not to mention even shallower depth of field ( which is practically non existent as it is. The 90-105 mm lengths are the best compromise and are what I’d recommend. Be aware that on a crop sensor camera, the only thing that changes is the field of view. Minimum focus distance remains the same. That said, I prefer shooting with a crop sensor as I’m using the central portion of the lens ( where it is most sharp) and I find I don’t have to crop the image as much .

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2018 07:46:26   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
From what I know it is a very good macro lens. If you want to go Nikon they make excellent 105mm f2.8 Micro Nikkor lenses and many of them are in the second hand market at attractive prices.

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 08:03:47   #
starrphotos
 
Before spending money on glass, consider macro extension tubes. They are inexpensive and you can use your current lenses. I have just begun exploring the "macro" world. Attached is a photo using my Canon 80D w/ a 13mm macro extension tube/EF-S55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM


(Download)

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 08:51:27   #
Charlie'smom
 
I shoot with a Nikon D7200 and just bought a Tokina 100mm macro. I love it. I read Ken Rockwell’s review of the Nikon 85mm, and he recommended the Tokina over the Nikon. Read his review. I found it to be spot on.

https://kenrockwell.com/tokina/100mm-f28.htm

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 09:24:23   #
vista
 
Thank you all for your responses. I really appreciate your input.

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2018 09:51:46   #
Steve DeMott Loc: St. Louis, Missouri (Oakville area)
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
You will be hard pressed to find a macro lens that doesn’t deliver.. yeah, some may test out better but most of those tests are bench tests and you won’t come anywhere near the results in real world shooting. Unless you intend to use a macro for other than macro shooting, AF and VR aren’t needed and are ineffective at at macro distances. I shoot my macro ( my niche) with a D7100 and an older 105 mm MF macro lens. I do have 8 different AF and MF macro lenses from 55 to 180mm. Most responses you will get will tout whichever macro lens the responder uses. Shorter lenses will put you right on top of your subject, making lighting difficult and scarring away many insects. Longer focal lengths get you farther away but at the expense of being more costly and bulky, not to mention even shallower depth of field ( which is practically non existent as it is. The 90-105 mm lengths are the best compromise and are what I’d recommend. Be aware that on a crop sensor camera, the only thing that changes is the field of view. Minimum focus distance remains the same. That said, I prefer shooting with a crop sensor as I’m using the central portion of the lens ( where it is most sharp) and I find I don’t have to crop the image as much .
You will be hard pressed to find a macro lens that... (show quote)


Spot on

I use a Nikkor 105mm 2.8D Macro (KEH @ $350) and have found it to be a very fine lens. I'm also considering another lens around the 60mm length.

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 10:07:21   #
Genessi Loc: SoCal
 
I use the Olympus 60mm Macro on my Lumix but I do miss the longer focal length of the Canon100mm I once owned.

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 11:37:20   #
3dees
 
if you shoot insects, may I suggest the Sigma 150mm Macro. a little big and a little heavy, but a superb lens.

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 11:53:53   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
vista wrote:
I currently use a Nikon D7200 and am looking for a macro lense recommendation. Does anyone have opinions on the Tokina 100mm f/2.8 AT-X AF pro D Macro? Appreciate any input. Thank you


At a small fraction of the cost auto extension tube will shorten the close focus distance of any lens but sacrifices infinity focus. I paid $13 for a set of 2 tubes, 10 and 16mm (Neewer).

The Tokina is a very good choice considering the cost. Image quality is competitive with more expensive brands.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2018 11:59:39   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
Extension tubes can get you decent images, but besides the loss of infinity focus, you also lose light (requiring you to open up the aperture & that decreases depth of field) plus that magnification ratio is fixed. So if a subject doesn't fit in the frame, or isn't large enough, you have to change out tubes to change the ratio.... Tubes are good in a pinch, but a true macro lens is much more versatile & convenient.
joer wrote:
At a small fraction of the cost auto extension tube will shorten the close focus distance of any lens but sacrifices infinity focus. I paid $13 for a set of 2 tubes, 10 and 16mm (Neewer).

The Tokina is a very good choice considering the cost. Image quality is competitive with more expensive brands.

Reply
Jul 4, 2018 12:07:10   #
deer2ker Loc: Nashville, TN
 
I bought the Tokina and absolutely love the lens. I have a D5500 and only am able to use it manually (of course the 7200 will autofocus with this lens!) and still have been very happy with it. The best thing about this lens, besides its excellent macro 1:1 clarity, is that it makes a wonderful portrait lens! I have attached the very first pics I took with this lens. I can't wait to use it for its real purpose when I get some time. I rented the 7200 for a wedding and it worked perfectly with the Tokina - you will not be sorry!


(Download)



Reply
Jul 4, 2018 12:30:30   #
dduty
 
The Nikon 105 is a great lens with outstanding Bokeh. It is also great for portraits, and surprisingly versatile.



Reply
Jul 4, 2018 13:25:48   #
kpmac Loc: Ragley, La
 
vista wrote:
I currently use a Nikon D7200 and am looking for a macro lense recommendation. Does anyone have opinions on the Tokina 100mm f/2.8 AT-X AF pro D Macro? Appreciate any input. Thank you


I have this lens and I really like it. I have posted many images here which you can view for reference. I'm not an expert but this lens sure is capable for expert photography.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.