Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Ansel Adams on the Yosemite Valley
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Oct 31, 2017 07:04:31   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
BHC wrote:
Ansel Adams was not perfect. Yes, he did have an affair with assistant Patsy English, but it’s commonly believed that Virginia knew about it. For obvious reasons, Patsy is not mentioned in his autobiography (I’d like to see the first draft, or even an early uncorrected proof of the book.) In his early years, he was often described as unruly, and was taken out of school at the age of 12 to be home schooled. He was prone to illness; Ansel is known to have had at least one major mental breakdown. He was a driven workaholic, often pushing himself and his staff (including Virginia) 15 hours per day. And he was a perfectionist; “Moonrise” was shot in 1941, but it was not until the 70’s that Ansel produced a print to his liking.

All of this just made him human. In my brief meeting with him, he was calm, patient and courteous. I wish I had known him better.
Ansel Adams was not perfect. Yes, he did have an ... (show quote)

Honestly, none of the gossip about his personal life is really relevant to me. All that matters to me about him are the photos he took.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 07:22:39   #
fourg1b2006 Loc: Long Island New York
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
If we shoot 24/7 for the rest of our lives, we might approach a quarter of his talent and vision.


You give us to much credit.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 08:06:11   #
Largobob
 
lamontcranston wrote:
In the public domain as well as his comments on the Yosemite Valley where he spent much of his photographic life. The man is a legend and I thought this portrait of him was a great tribute to one of the greatest photographers of all times. His work extended from the 20's to the 80's and the Yosemite Valley was the subject of some of his greatest photographs. Of course, there would be no point to the post to someone who has no idea who he was.


Thank you for posting that. IMHO, Ansel Adams WAS the master of all photography.

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2017 08:10:17   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Yes, prayer is always a good idea.


👍

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 08:12:34   #
Brent Rowlett Loc: Atlanta, GA
 
I have a timeshare in Jackson Hole for the week of color #39. Even in my old age I like to pretend I am Ansel out with my cameras. The Grand Tetons and Big Sur were his favorite spots for his material. We can still dream.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 08:29:55   #
phlash46 Loc: Westchester County, New York
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
If we shoot 24/7 for the rest of our lives, we might approach a quarter of his talent and vision.


If I got to 25% I'd have a party.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 08:30:09   #
cdayton
 
Before you declare any photographer the greatest, have a look at Frank Hurley’s 1915 shots of the Endurance as it was being crushed in the Antarctic ice. Adams had it easy!

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2017 08:58:14   #
treadwl Loc: South Florida
 
alf85 wrote:
If they made digital cameras with 1/4 plate size censors, most of us would be as good as him if not better.
Regards, Alfie.


So SORRY folks. I never get into this type of a discussion but your comment tripped me over the top. Have you ever looked at the stuff posted on this or any other photographic site??? Most of these folks couldn't ever approach Ansel's quality of work even if he was standing at their side. The comment from you quoted above just shows your lack of knowledge and character. The man was a true master. He inspires, but I have not seen his equal (maybe Clyde Butcher) and I have looked. Does it really hurt to give him the credit he deserves?




Now I am ashamed of myself for stooping to this level of comment. I am sorry.


Larry

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 09:02:48   #
Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.
 
BHC wrote:
Ansel Adams was not perfect. Yes, he did have an affair with assistant Patsy English, but it’s commonly believed that Virginia knew about it. For obvious reasons, Patsy is not mentioned in his autobiography (I’d like to see the first draft, or even an early uncorrected proof of the book.) In his early years, he was often described as unruly, and was taken out of school at the age of 12 to be home schooled. He was prone to illness; Ansel is known to have had at least one major mental breakdown. He was a driven workaholic, often pushing himself and his staff (including Virginia) 15 hours per day. And he was a perfectionist; “Moonrise” was shot in 1941, but it was not until the 70’s that Ansel produced a print to his liking.

All of this just made him human. In my brief meeting with him, he was calm, patient and courteous. I wish I had known him better.
Ansel Adams was not perfect. Yes, he did have an ... (show quote)

Although it "made him human", it certainly wasn't at all germane to this conversation which was about his craft. The current trend to always include whatever dirt that can be found, no matter who or what is being written about, speaks volumes as to the modern mind set.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 09:21:15   #
lsimpkins Loc: SE Pennsylvania
 
treadwl wrote:
So SORRY folks. I never get into this type of a discussion but your comment tripped me over the top. Have you ever looked at the stuff posted on this or any other photographic site??? Most of these folks couldn't ever approach Ansel's quality of work even if he was standing at their side. The comment from you quoted above just shows your lack of knowledge and character. The man was a true master. He inspires, but I have not seen his equal (maybe Clyde Butcher) and I have looked. Does it really hurt to give him the credit he deserves?
So SORRY folks. I never get into this type of a d... (show quote)

Have to agree. A little humility and self-deprecation goes a long way in this world.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 09:24:15   #
duane klipping Loc: Bristow iowa
 
via the lens wrote:
O', I have a very good idea of who he was and most likely know as much if not more than you do about him, from the smallest detail to the largest and most well-know detail. For example, I know that his drive regarding photography caused him to die with no family in attendance and only his photography assistant to be by his side; I know that his constant striving in photography caused him to have a very unhappy marriage although he and his wife stayed together and that his children had little love for him; I know that he was a "ladies man," and loved alcohol and parties. I know that it is because of him that we all know photography as an art today and that if not for him and his incredible intellect photography might not be what it is today nor, most likely, would our technology in the art of photography be what it is. Other than Edward Stieglitz, Ansel Adams contributed the most knowledge and insight into photography and into placing it as an art than any other photographer of his day . I study him extensively and have learned much through this study about how to take a photo; I'm much more an f.64 type than a Pictorial type. I just wanted to check that this particular photo was in the public domain, as many are, since we are all, as photographers, concerned with that when a photo is posted, it would be good to say that in the post, attribution is usually good when posting a photo. I also wanted to know if there was an actual point, a discussion point, so to speak, not just a quote. I've read almost, have one more book to get, every bio written about him and his auto-biography and his letters and his photo technique books. Just now I'm finishing up the f.64 book, good read and includes a lot of information on the other photographers "in the day." In fact one of them, Walker Evans, currently has an exhibition at the San Francisco Modern Museum of Art for all the Northern California photographers on this site, it goes until February. Also getting to know Doreathea Lange better through books on her. It's too bad I don't have a better memory, darn! Do not assume, based on responses, what people might know or not know about a particular subject.
O', I have a very good idea of who he was and most... (show quote)


Someone needs to chill and drink some decaf. The funny thing is no one likes a tattle tale and this is after all just a forum for the exchange of ideas and information. No go run and tell the teacher on us...Wow....

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2017 09:27:07   #
Krittermom
 
I have followed this forum for some time now. I started because I felt there were many members that have much knowledge about photography. What I simply can not understand are the people that are either snowflakes with delicate feelings or the one member that shall remain nameless (everyone knows who) that has appointed himself god of this site. As I get older I find myself becoming much less tolerant of such narcissistic behavior. The original post here was a wonderful tribute to Adams. To see one make this topic become a contest about who knows more and who is correct is incredibly childish. The subject of the eclipse also brought out such childish behavior that I found it quite amazing. I did notice that there seemed to be very few pictures posted of the eclipse. I wonder why? Could it be that the negativity that came out prior to the eclipse made most people simply not post? I thought this was a site that people could ask questions and get information on all things about photography without being attacked. Apparently not.
If I can find a way to completely block those few people I would again enjoy this forum each morning.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 09:37:01   #
flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
via the lens wrote:
O', I have a very good idea of who he was and most likely know as much if not more than you do about him, from the smallest detail to the largest and most well-know detail. For example, I know that his drive regarding photography caused him to die with no family in attendance and only his photography assistant to be by his side; I know that his constant striving in photography caused him to have a very unhappy marriage although he and his wife stayed together and that his children had little love for him; I know that he was a "ladies man," and loved alcohol and parties. I know that it is because of him that we all know photography as an art today and that if not for him and his incredible intellect photography might not be what it is today nor, most likely, would our technology in the art of photography be what it is. Other than Edward Stieglitz, Ansel Adams contributed the most knowledge and insight into photography and into placing it as an art than any other photographer of his day . I study him extensively and have learned much through this study about how to take a photo; I'm much more an f.64 type than a Pictorial type. I just wanted to check that this particular photo was in the public domain, as many are, since we are all, as photographers, concerned with that when a photo is posted, it would be good to say that in the post, attribution is usually good when posting a photo. I also wanted to know if there was an actual point, a discussion point, so to speak, not just a quote. I've read almost, have one more book to get, every bio written about him and his auto-biography and his letters and his photo technique books. Just now I'm finishing up the f.64 book, good read and includes a lot of information on the other photographers "in the day." In fact one of them, Walker Evans, currently has an exhibition at the San Francisco Modern Museum of Art for all the Northern California photographers on this site, it goes until February. Also getting to know Doreathea Lange better through books on her. It's too bad I don't have a better memory, darn! Do not assume, based on responses, what people might know or not know about a particular subject.
O', I have a very good idea of who he was and most... (show quote)


"Do not assume, based on responses, what people might know or not know about a particular subject."

Right on, too many on here do!!!

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 10:01:09   #
pendennis
 
lamontcranston wrote:
...I found it interesting because I love those old cameras and the fact that his left hand appears to be holding a Gossen lightmeter. I suspect if he were still living today he might still be using a large-format camera to capture the types of images he is so famous for.


The light meter is a Weston Master (Don't know if it's a I or II. Definitely not a Gossen.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 10:03:11   #
Bear2 Loc: Southeast,, MI
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
If we shoot 24/7 for the rest of our lives, we might approach a quarter of his talent and vision.


Dreamer
I could never come that close.

Duane

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.