Oh no! Drats! Woe is me! Really? This is for sure going to send the global warming goof balls off the deep end! :lol:
Jakebrake wrote:
Oh no! Drats! Woe is me! Really? This is for sure going to send the global warming goof balls off the deep end! :lol:
Yeah, who in hell would think man could EVER make or leave a mark on this planet. It's a bottomless pit. The same "goof balls" used to complain about dumping in the oceans as if we would fill them up. Everybody knows the oceans are bigger then any landfill just as the sky has no limit.
I'm sure you would have to agree, God made this world large so we'd have plenty of room to dump all we want with impunity. "Goof balls", what do they know? :hunf: :roll:
Where does one go to purchase their 'carbon offset credits', the Clinton Foundation?
Blasthoff wrote:
Yeah, who in hell would think man could EVER make or leave a mark on this planet. It's a bottomless pit. The same "goof balls" used to complain about dumping in the oceans as if we would fill them up. Everybody knows the oceans are bigger then any landfill just as the sky has no limit.
I'm sure you would have to agree, God made this world large so we'd have plenty of room to dump all we want with impunity. "Goof balls", what do they know? :hunf: :roll:
You know, with all of your silly pomp and hyperbole, maybe many global warming skeptics would take you and your ilk more seriously if you didn't have Al Gore and many of his ubber wealthy cadre of alarmists making billions off of this nonsense. :wink:
You and your followers, which seems like it has almost become a religion with you folks, loose all credibility when you refuse to even consider the fact weather may indeed be cyclic. Written records do not go back far enough to disprove it, but it makes not difference to the goof balls! :-) Did you even bother to read the link? Probably not as it just doesn't fit your agenda!
Truth who benefits most, always follow the money. It works 99% of the time.
Mother Earth will do what she has likely done many times-shake the vermin off her like a wet dog does the water, and begin again. But on the other hand, fouling the soil, water, and air cannot but have some negative effect on Her and hasten what is a natural occurrence.
And one day, She will simply grow old and die. Who is to say that that day is or is not approaching? Our esteemed scientists can't even agree to the age of Her or the Sun. We could burn up tomorrow or we could freeze to death. There is as much evidence out there supporting an ice age as there is burning up. Back in the '70s, the CIA scientists projected another ice age and their evidence was a good as that for heating up.
All things material eventually grow old, grow cold, and die. Why do we think Mother Earth and the Sun are immune to this? jmo
Jakebrake wrote:
Oh no! Drats! Woe is me! Really? This is for sure going to send the global warming goof balls off the deep end! :lol:
When I read this last night I almost chocked - First thought was "this has to be a prank" second thought was "the same as yours" LMAO - One has to look at these scientists and realize the years of research they have put into this to come to this conclusion.
It is a fool who does not know that there has been a constant change here on this earth from the time it started it's creation with many ice ages as well as warnings/hot and dry.
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Jakebrake wrote:
Oh no! Drats! Woe is me! Really? This is for sure going to send the global warming goof balls off the deep end! :lol:
It'll be a warm ice-age. :D
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Michael Hartley wrote:
Where does one go to purchase their 'carbon offset credits', the Clinton Foundation?
Wait awhile. The price will drop.
houdel
Loc: Chase, Michigan USA
Jakebrake wrote:
Oh no! Drats! Woe is me! Really? This is for sure going to send the global warming goof balls off the deep end! :lol:
Get with the times Jake! Its not "Global Warming" anymore because none of the dire predictions postulated by the the global warming goofballs ever came to fruition. It is now called "Climate Change" because 1) the Earth isn't warming and 2) "Climate Change" is more politically correct than the much longer but more technically correct term "A UN brokered scheme to alarm the uneducated public with a non-existent problem thus facilitating a worldwide redistribution of wealth from the wealthy, successful democratic Nations to poor, unsuccessful, repressive third world hellholes intent only on furthering world unrest".
houdel wrote:
Get with the times Jake! Its not "Global Warming" anymore because none of the dire predictions postulated by the the global warming goofballs ever came to fruition. It is now called "Climate Change" because 1) the Earth isn't warming and 2) "Climate Change" is more politically correct than the much longer but more technically correct term "A UN brokered scheme to alarm the uneducated public with a non-existent problem thus facilitating a worldwide redistribution of wealth from the wealthy, successful democratic Nations to poor, unsuccessful, repressive third world hellholes intent only on furthering world unrest".
Get with the times Jake! Its not "Global Warm... (
show quote)
Yes- the climate "IS" changing one more time as it has done over and over from the very beginning - but now it sells papers and books and the list goes on. Have we forgotten the "Dust Bowl" years already - the blizzards that wiped out the cattle in the west in the late 1800's.
They recently found evidence of a 250 yr drouth from tree stumps deep down in Lake Tahoe.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.