Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
New York City Will Close Schools to Observe Muslim Holidays
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 4, 2015 23:37:00   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
RixPix wrote:
One holiday is in the summer...and the other is only a day. Schools close for the Christian hang a Jew from a cross day so what's the beef?


think that kinda be established... Next

Reply
Mar 4, 2015 23:54:47   #
tschmath Loc: Los Angeles
 
idaholover wrote:
It's really all about the NEA getting grifter public employees more time off with pay.


Your ignorance is truly astounding. If the city is taking those two days as holidays, then they have to extend the school year by 2 days. Each state has a set number of days that they must be in school, and any holidays must be offset by extending the school year. You keep proving what a total jerk you are when you spout off about crap you know nothing about.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 00:34:12   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
Kombiguy wrote:
I believe that most places call it "spring break," not Easter week. It has long since ceased to be a religious holiday observation.

That said, I am waiting for Zoroastrian holidays to be added to the calendar of an already failing school system.


Easter and Christmas both have roots in pagan holidays.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2015 00:49:25   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
soba1 wrote:
Easter and Christmas both have roots in pagan holidays.



they covered over these two
Christmas Come to Be Celebrated on December 25 Roman pagans first introduced the holiday of Saturnalia, a week long period of lawlessness

"Teutonic dawn goddess of fertility [was] known variously as Ostare, Ostara, Ostern, Eostra, Eostre, Eostur, Eastra, Eastur, Austron and Ausos."

All about the Christmas Tree: Pagan origins,
Christian adaptation, & secular status

http://www.religioustolerance.org/xmas_tree.htm

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 01:25:57   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
dirtpusher wrote:
they covered over these two
Christmas Come to Be Celebrated on December 25 Roman pagans first introduced the holiday of Saturnalia, a week long period of lawlessness

"Teutonic dawn goddess of fertility [was] known variously as Ostare, Ostara, Ostern, Eostra, Eostre, Eostur, Eastra, Eastur, Austron and Ausos."

All about the Christmas Tree: Pagan origins,
Christian adaptation, & secular status

http://www.religioustolerance.org/xmas_tree.htm



:thumbup:

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 08:25:42   #
mwalsh Loc: Houston
 
Didn't the shepherds bring a cut tree w/ lights to the manger?

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 09:30:37   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
tschmath wrote:
Your ignorance is truly astounding. If the city is taking those two days as holidays, then they have to extend the school year by 2 days. Each state has a set number of days that they must be in school, and any holidays must be offset by extending the school year. You keep proving what a total jerk you are when you spout off about crap you know nothing about.


180 days. Most of us have to work an entire year. Screw you and your arrogance and insults. Most public, union, employees are are democrats and live very well off the public taxpayer tit!

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2015 09:44:12   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
thom w wrote:
Have they stopped having Christmas and Easter vacation where you live?


You completely miss the point as usual. They are not Christmas or Easter anymore. They have removed any religious reference from all government.

So why in hell do we have to observe "Muslim Holy Days"? Sounds like a clear violation of the non-existent "separation of church and state" that was touted by liberals to remove Christian "holy days" from gov't.

Again, PC hypocritical pandering.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 10:08:10   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
skylane5sp wrote:
You completely miss the point as usual. They are not Christmas or Easter anymore. They have removed any religious reference from all government.

So why in hell do we have to observe "Muslim Holy Days"? Sounds like a clear violation of the non-existent "separation of church and state" that was touted by liberals to remove Christian "holy days" from gov't.

Again, PC hypocritical pandering.


Absolutely, without a shadow of doubt correct! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 10:20:00   #
Kanonmeister Loc: Los Angeles
 
idaholover wrote:
180 days. Most of us have to work an entire year. Screw you and your arrogance and insults. Most public, union, employees are are democrats and live very well off the public taxpayer tit!


"Most public, union, employees are democrats"

Define "most." Leaving out independents, its 32% vs. 28%.

But the breakdown is actually: 32% democrats; 37% independents; 28% republicans.[also, if one may assume, a similar breakdown representing the taxpayer "tit" in the general population of voters??? Dunno. Independents may not vote. Look for data]

Leaving aside the question of whether ANYONE today would want to identify with the current policies of the Republican Party, read the Gallop poll conducted in 2010:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/146786/democrats-lead-ranks-union-state-workers.aspx

These data are based on 177,775 interviews with employed Americans conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking in 2010. Government employment and union status are based on workers' self-reports.

Among all U.S. adults interviewed, 32% are Democrats, 37% independents, and 28% Republicans.

Among other key findings:
The gap in Democratic party identification between union and nonunion work environments is largest among private-sector workers and federal government workers, with an 11.8-percentage-point and a 10.2-point gap, respectively.
Nonunionized state government workers show a smaller gap than the one found among unionized state workers, but still demonstrate a nearly 10-point Democrat (39.2%) to Republican (29.5%) gap.
Among private-sector workers who are unionized, Democrats outnumber Republicans by a substantial 42% to 24% margin.
Federal and local government workers who are unionized are also more likely to be Democrats than Republicans, albeit with a smaller partisan gap than among state and private-sector workers. Nonunion federal and local government workers are roughly even in terms of Democratic and Republican identification.
Nonunion private-sector workers are about evenly split between Republicans and Democrats.
The political profile of every major category of union workers is more strongly Democratic than that of the public at large -- with between 40% and 46% identifying as Democrats -- and somewhat less Republican and independent. Nevertheless, a significant minority -- ranging from 24% to 27% of unionized workers, depending on area of employment -- identify as Republicans.
Some of these political distinctions may be caused by underlying demographic patterns that characterize union jobs versus nonunion jobs. With that in mind, Gallup controlled for all relevant demographics and found a muted, but similar pattern.
Implications
Unions have been in the news in recent months as Republican Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin made state employee unions the major target of his efforts to cut costs and reduce his state's budget. Walker and Republican legislators in Wisconsin engaged in a protracted battle with the unions and Democratic legislators over these efforts, effectively underscoring the highly partisan nature of union politics in today's environment. Unions have become one of the largest financial supporters of Democratic candidates for office, and the confrontation with Gov. Walker was likely amplified still further because of the probable political orientation of unionized state workers in Wisconsin.
The current data show that rank-and-file union members tend to follow these same partisan patterns across both government and private industry employment sectors. Even when demographic characteristics of union and nonunion members are controlled for, those who are union members skew at least slightly more Democratic in their political orientation than those who are not union members.

Survey Methods
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of the Gallup Daily tracking survey with 177,775 national working adults, aged 18 and older, conducted Jan. 2-Dec. 29, 2010. Of these, 144,682 respondents work inside of a nongovernment setting, and 133,317 of these are not in unions, while 11,365 are. For results based on the total sample of national working adults in a nongovernment setting, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±0.3 percentage point for those not in a union and ±0.9 percentage point for those who are.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 11:42:40   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
idaholover wrote:
180 days. Most of us have to work an entire year. Screw you and your arrogance and insults. Most public, union, employees are are democrats and live very well off the public taxpayer tit!


It sounds like you are very bitter over the career path you have chosen. Did someone force you into this career path?

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2015 12:03:09   #
tschmath Loc: Los Angeles
 
idaholover wrote:
180 days. Most of us have to work an entire year. Screw you and your arrogance and insults. Most public, union, employees are are democrats and live very well off the public taxpayer tit!


You are certainly a bitter, angry man who knows nothing and spews a lot of hate.

Let's be real. According to payscale.com, the average middle school teacher in this country makes $42,800. Not poverty level, but "living well off the public tit?" I hardly think so. Teachers are actually the best bargain you can get for your buck. Let's look at it together, shall we?

I have 4 years of college and a fifth year of post grad work for my credential. So here's what I propose. Pay me just $3 an hour to teach your kid. For 6 hours a day, that's $18. For the 38 days I have your child, that's $118,000 a year. And that's less than we pay babysitters these days. Keep in mind this doesn't count the hours a day I work for free at home grading papers, making parent phone calls and planning lessons.

Change the $3 an hour to the federal minimum wage of $7.25, and my salary jumps to $297,6540. Now try to find another profession that pays people with 5 years of college the minimum wage.

And instead you're paying me an average salary of $42,800. And from that deduct the hundreds or thousands of dollars I spend on supplies for my classroom.

I hate to be rude, but why don't you and everyone else who bashes teachers just step inside a classroom for a week. You'll go screaming from the room before it's over. You asshats have no idea what we deal with, but are very quick to condemn us. I know you never will, so please go f*&k yourself.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 12:12:09   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
tschmath wrote:
You are certainly a bitter, angry man who knows nothing and spews a lot of hate.

Let's be real. According to payscale.com, the average middle school teacher in this country makes $42,800. Not poverty level, but "living well off the public tit?" I hardly think so. Teachers are actually the best bargain you can get for your buck. Let's look at it together, shall we?

I have 4 years of college and a fifth year of post grad work for my credential. So here's what I propose. Pay me just $3 an hour to teach your kid. For 6 hours a day, that's $18. For the 38 days I have your child, that's $118,000 a year. And that's less than we pay babysitters these days. Keep in mind this doesn't count the hours a day I work for free at home grading papers, making parent phone calls and planning lessons.

Change the $3 an hour to the federal minimum wage of $7.25, and my salary jumps to $297,6540. Now try to find another profession that pays people with 5 years of college the minimum wage.

And instead you're paying me an average salary of $42,800. And from that deduct the hundreds or thousands of dollars I spend on supplies for my classroom.

I hate to be rude, but why don't you and everyone else who bashes teachers just step inside a classroom for a week. You'll go screaming from the room before it's over. You asshats have no idea what we deal with, but are very quick to condemn us. I know you never will, so please go f*&k yourself.
You are certainly a bitter, angry man who knows no... (show quote)

From what I have seen on here you arn't worth $3.00 an hour. Find another job and quit bitching. I work on straight commission and pay ALL my own expenses. I am on a business trip right now that will cost me out of pocket about $400.00!
Go f___yourself in the ass!

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 12:15:30   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
tschmath wrote:
You are certainly a bitter, angry man who knows nothing and spews a lot of hate.

Let's be real. According to payscale.com, the average middle school teacher in this country makes $42,800. Not poverty level, but "living well off the public tit?" I hardly think so. Teachers are actually the best bargain you can get for your buck. Let's look at it together, shall we?

I have 4 years of college and a fifth year of post grad work for my credential. So here's what I propose. Pay me just $3 an hour to teach your kid. For 6 hours a day, that's $18. For the 38 days I have your child, that's $118,000 a year. And that's less than we pay babysitters these days. Keep in mind this doesn't count the hours a day I work for free at home grading papers, making parent phone calls and planning lessons.

Change the $3 an hour to the federal minimum wage of $7.25, and my salary jumps to $297,6540. Now try to find another profession that pays people with 5 years of college the minimum wage.

And instead you're paying me an average salary of $42,800. And from that deduct the hundreds or thousands of dollars I spend on supplies for my classroom.

I hate to be rude, but why don't you and everyone else who bashes teachers just step inside a classroom for a week. You'll go screaming from the room before it's over. You asshats have no idea what we deal with, but are very quick to condemn us. I know you never will, so please go f*&k yourself.
You are certainly a bitter, angry man who knows no... (show quote)


YA wanna whine go join the Army! Those people have a legitimate bitch, especially with the boss they have.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 12:19:05   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
idaholover wrote:
From what I have seen on here you arn't worth $3.00 an hour. Find another job and quit bitching. I work on straight commission and pay ALL my own expenses. I am on a business trip right now that will cost me out of pocket about $400.00!
Go f___yourself in the ass!


You made the decision to be self employed. Now live with it and quit hating on everybody else. Manufacturers reps I have known had a relatively easy schedule and made a damn good living. Are you sure you're any good at it?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.