Hoot72 wrote:
Just because you can't understand it doesn't mean there isn't a coherent message. To bad; I thought you were more intelligent. Maybe if you try to read it again...
Or maybe this (my response to whole2th, below) will help, Larry:
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
The Attic -> Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Mastermind behind 9/11 (go to message) Jan 4, 15 20:44:57
larrypayne wrote:
You come up with that same perpetrator sponsored website every time, Hoot.
As with all coverup articles, your website attempts to use thousands of words to confuse readers as to what actually happened.
There is no coherent message in what is written on that site just a garbled bunch of gobbledegook.
Just because you can't understand it doesn't mean there isn't a coherent message. To bad; I thought you were more intelligent. Maybe if you try to read it again...
The Attic -> The End of Israel #3 (go to message) Jan 4, 15 20:36:54
whole2th wrote:
Looking back, LP and I have posted hundreds of links--and the predominant "defense" offered by you, Hoot72, and your ilk is to attack us rather than rebut the evidence.
The predominate defense offered by others as well as me, has been fact, including the official narrative and several factual rebuttals, some from such sites as the JOD. You and LP continue to ignore our comments and evidence. LP won't even read the official narrative, saying, "Why should I...".
whole2th wrote:
Here's a prime example that I've reposted a number of times--and there is no reply to rebut the facts that prove Building 7 to be a controlled demolition. This means that the 9/11 event was pre-planned ... not a surprise attack.
http://ReThink911.orgHere it is, one more (out of what must be in the hundreds on several threads) time:
http://www.debunking911.com/ . Included on that site is a reference to the JOD.
whole2th wrote:
Some here say LP and I are 'alone' in our views. The 39,000+ members of "9/11 Truth Movement" on Facebook are fine company to keep. There is a wealth of information that is easily searchable.
They are just as nutty as you and have no credible evidence. To wit: Actors and entertainers, Pilots, 2K architects and engineers, when there are almost 1M a and e's in the US alone, "eye witness accounts" which don't necessarily represent truth*, etc. Read the JOD. Read the official narrative. Apply appropriate logic to determine what is fact.
*There were 1500 eye witness to Lincoln's assassination. No two matched. Source: "Killing Lincoln" as recently shown here.
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/killing-lincoln/ and narrated, I believe, by Tom Hanks.
whole2th wrote:
So far as posting links showing a scheme to influence Wikipedia in editing content that makes it favorable to the zionist agenda, I'll leave it to you to find the links. No reason to make the info-trolls work easier.
In other words, you can't substantiate your "facts".
whole2th wrote:
If there is 'hate' in this message, please note it.
The most immediate fact smacking of hate on this and other similar threads, is your refusal to accept rebuttals to your drivel; or in certain cases to not even acknowledge the 'other sides' comments.
Here. This is something you and other truthers may find of interest:
http://www.esquire.com/features/thousand-words-on-culture/conspiracy-theories-0509