Gave it a go with GIMP. Catch lights in eyes would help, I think, but I'm not that good at catch lights. For future reference, outdoor flash is FUN
I masked out the background, going fuzzy around the hair, and just pulled curves around until I thought it looked ok. The white balance seemed fine, and I just left the background alone. Actually, just realized that the upper girl's face seems a bit blue on one side. Copying layer, shifting blue curves and making as another mask and using as a low opacity overlay would have helped.
Here is my attempt with LR5
I did the following:
WB
Temp +8
Tint NC
Exposure -.50
Contrast +32
Highlights NC
Shadows -44
Whites +6
Blacks -4
Clarity +20
Vibrance +12
Saturation +12
HSL
Red Saturation -53
Detail
Sharpening 88
Radius 1.8
Noise Reduction
Luminance 29
Color 45
Don't know If Gimp has It,but If so try Auto White balance,and also
try to adjust Saturation slightly.I made some adjustments to your photo
White Balance, and color Saturation .Also still trying to better myself.
Still not a bad Portrait that you did.
dali_lama_2k wrote:
Gave it a go with GIMP. Catch lights in eyes would help, I think, but I'm not that good at catch lights. For future reference, outdoor flash is FUN
I also agree with Dali,Lama you get better results when using
flash outside
FROMJOHN wrote:
I also agree with Dali,Lama you get better results when using
flash outside
Also agree with the flash (or a reflector) for some fill to help with the shadowing.
Surprised no black and white unless I missed it..When all else fails sometimes a conversion works.
ricardolegraham wrote:
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of frustration for a while. It's not of much importance to me, but it's an interesting PP challenge.
I took this after a friend had shot a few pictures and I didn't realize he had set my camera to shutter priority at 1/3200, so I ended up exposing at ISO 2000, getting a lot of noise, and faded colors. (he also set the picture style to my Technicolor Cinestyle preset, which I reserve for tweaking on video shoots, so colors are faded at all ISOs.) I recently tried fixing it up in GIMP (That's all my budget can take, no Lightroom here), and I just can't quite make them pop. Any suggestions? or did the high shutter speed/ISO (and Cinestyle - in case you're wondering, never use Cinestyle for stills) just mess it up too much?
Canon 60D, EF-S18-55 3.5-5.6 IS II 1/3200 f/5 ISO 2000
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of ... (
show quote)
Hi Ricardo. Here's one with a bit of 'Lomo' effect (vignetting), increased contrast, saturation and tiny bit of local sharpening. Just one of several approaches one might take with this very appealing shot. Nice one.
Adjusted photo
I do see a lot of cyan in the skin. Produced by white balance off. Here is a quick edit. Thanks.
In PSE10 I adjusted levels and adjusted color for skin tone plus a little spot healing. I hope you think it is an improvement!
ricardolegraham wrote:
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of frustration for a while. It's not of much importance to me, but it's an interesting PP challenge.
I took this after a friend had shot a few pictures and I didn't realize he had set my camera to shutter priority at 1/3200, so I ended up exposing at ISO 2000, getting a lot of noise, and faded colors. (he also set the picture style to my Technicolor Cinestyle preset, which I reserve for tweaking on video shoots, so colors are faded at all ISOs.) I recently tried fixing it up in GIMP (That's all my budget can take, no Lightroom here), and I just can't quite make them pop. Any suggestions? or did the high shutter speed/ISO (and Cinestyle - in case you're wondering, never use Cinestyle for stills) just mess it up too much?
Canon 60D, EF-S18-55 3.5-5.6 IS II 1/3200 f/5 ISO 2000
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of ... (
show quote)
Here is my take using PSE 11
ok I am new and not particularly helpful but I couldn't resist joining the fun, lightroom
MikeIrby wrote:
Ricardo, too cute...
MikeIrby, I like what you did with this image! Nice save!
it appears you have shot this in the shade with no fill or reflector to put light back in as others have stated. when shooting in the shade you need to bounce some light back in
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.