The RAW vs JPEG Debate Needs to End… Again
Sep 8, 2022 18:56:30 #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
If it was fun, it wasn't meaningless, and the RAW vs JPG conversations are always fun. Besides, it gives some older folks an opportunity to get their blood pumping...!
Shoot how you want and don't concern yourself with what others are doing, and most importantly, have fun.
Shoot how you want and don't concern yourself with what others are doing, and most importantly, have fun.
Sep 8, 2022 19:14:17 #
camerapapi wrote:
This debate of shooting RAW data vs JPEG is as old as the invention of photography.
I know what the point is you are trying to make but, photography, for all intents and purposes, was invented in the late 1830's early 1840's and Digital photography was invented in 1975.
Anyway, if shooting JPG does what the shooter wants, shoot JPG. If the shooter prefers the options RAW gives and understands how to use RAW and doesn't mind the extra time it takes to process RAW, shoot RAW.
Some people don't like pepperoni on their pizza and some people don't like pizza. Some people ride Harley Davidson motorcycles because they believe Harley's are all American, and many of those same people drive Toyota's or Honda's or BMW's.
It's a choice, so choose wisely, and have fun!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.