From personal experience can any of the many astute Hedgehoggers recommend a good quality color printer that doesn’t break the bank (under $300) with good fidelity and is reliable?
I’m very frustrated with what I’m using now: a Canon iP1800 that has satisfactory color rendition but with feeder problems (4x6 in particular), and an HP Envy 7858 that prints over-saturated colors with extreme contrast….no matter how I try to manipulate hue intensity and saturation. Flesh tones are terrible. The HP is relatively new but I’m not happy with either one.
I appreciate any suggestions offered.
I'm curious to hear the answers to your question, because I don't print my pictures. It may help to define your question if you say how you use your printed pictures, i. E., what level of quality you need.
Chuck
I abandoned HP years ago and have since used only Epson printers, with which I've always been happy. There are several models to choose from, and occasionally you can find a refurbished one on Epson's website, or eBay.
ChuckMc wrote:
I'm curious to hear the answers to your question, because I don't print my pictures. It may help to define your question if you say how you use your printed pictures, i. E., what level of quality you need.
Chuck
I do some freelance work and often provide selected complementary prints in addition to the digital files.
The level of quality that I need (want) is reasonably high; depending of course on the quality of the printer and my expectations from that printer. True colors are key, flesh tones in particular. The Canon I mentioned in my query (not a top-of-the-line machine) was quite satisfactory in that regard but now it has feeder problems. How these simple things fail, I don’t understand.
RichinSeattle wrote:
I abandoned HP years ago and have since used only Epson printers, with which I've always been happy. There are several models to choose from, and occasionally you can find a refurbished one on Epson's website, or eBay.
Thank you for your response, Rich.
I did a little research this morning and looked at the Epson ET2760 which has favorable reviews. A little more than $300 new. Brief specs say nothing about an SD card slot which HP has.
I have tank printers on my radar for "the next one". Since I print photos, it needs more than the typical three colors. That puts the "Canon PIXMA G620 Wireless MegaTank Photo All-in-One Printer" at $300 high on my list. It is far from a high end photo printer so is probably full of plastic parts. It does get good reviews.
Please look at HP printers. Excellent quality and their ink program is beyond compare. I have used them for years and never looked back. You will be pleasantly surprise, I promise.
gitano48 wrote:
From personal experience can any of the many astute Hedgehoggers recommend a good quality color printer that doesn’t break the bank (under $300) with good fidelity and is reliable?
I’m very frustrated with what I’m using now: a Canon iP1800 that has satisfactory color rendition but with feeder problems (4x6 in particular), and an HP Envy 7858 that prints over-saturated colors with extreme contrast….no matter how I try to manipulate hue intensity and saturation. Flesh tones are terrible. The HP is relatively new but I’m not happy with either one.
I appreciate any suggestions offered.
From personal experience can any of the many astut... (
show quote)
Did you try to load printer color management profiles? I think you should get then on CD that came with the printer.
Here is example from "Devices and Printers" screen:
RichinSeattle wrote:
I abandoned HP years ago and have since used only Epson printers, with which I've always been happy. There are several models to choose from, and occasionally you can find a refurbished one on Epson's website, or eBay.
I have come to the conclusion that there aren't any reliable printers under $300. I also abandoned HP years ago after having two of them fail right after the warranty expiration. I switched to a Canon and was very happy with it. Unfortunately, it was damaged in a move and I was not able to replace it with a similar model. I now have an Epson that I am very unhappy with. I have had numerous problems with it from Day One and Epson's tech support has been less helpful. They also would not honor their warranty.
I have used many HP printers and think that they are great for general document printing. For printing photos, however, I think that Epson printers are far superior and reliable
I have been through many printers over the years. All of them Epson which I found reliable with good quality. Not sure you can find what you are looking for for $300.
If you find a refurbished printer you may be able to find a better printer at that price. However I would caution buying any used printer. Insist on a current nozzle check.
Last but not least, do you really have a need to print your own prints? Considering the cost of inks and the fact that the lifespan of cheap printers isn’t very long, consider sending to a lab on-line.
Remember that to keep your printer from getting clogged heads you need to keep it running a lot or do nozzle checks and head cleanings which suck up a lot of inks.
Have you been to the printing forum on UHH?
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-120-1.htmlLook for a printer that has ink TANKS, not cartridges!
You will pay dearly for ink if you buy it in little cartridges.
These look promising: EPSON ET-8500 and ET-8550.
Whatever you buy, know that results depend almost entirely on monitor calibration and using the correct ICC PROFILES for your monitor, printer, ink, and paper combination.
A lack of understanding color management from camera to paper is the #1 reason photographers blame a printer for bad color. The old phrase, RTFM (Read The *Fine* Manual) applies, except you have several manuals to devour thoroughly!
I like my Epson 440 4-in-1. It was cheap but prints really slow. Decent quality for me but I don’t print much. 4 cartridges.
burkphoto wrote:
Have you been to the printing forum on UHH?
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-120-1.htmlLook for a printer that has ink TANKS, not cartridges!
You will pay dearly for ink if you buy it in little cartridges.
These look promising: EPSON ET-8500 and ET-8550.
Whatever you buy, know that results depend almost entirely on monitor calibration and using the correct ICC PROFILES for your monitor, printer, ink, and paper combination.
A lack of understanding color management from camera to paper is the #1 reason photographers blame a printer for bad color. The old phrase, RTFM (Read The *Fine* Manual) applies, except you have several manuals to devour thoroughly!
Have you been to the printing forum on UHH? https... (
show quote)
The EPSON ET-8500 and ET-8550 are significantly higher than the OP's target price!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.