knowing this ( I have seen this in articles, before ), does it follow that the 20mp MFT cameras COULD produce a better image than 24mp models ( not withstanding sensors used, etc. ) ?
The difference in MP will never show up. I think that they went to 20 because they are better pixels.
so, as I understand it, lesser pixels allow for larger pixels, which should result in better quality; however, more pixels also adds to better quality; so, there is a trade-off somewhere, or, am I oversimplifying things ?