Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Supreme Court Threatened
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
Aug 15, 2019 00:40:57   #
Angmo
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Removing will be in order but maybe not quite who you would like.


Just remove them four and trump can fill the seats with decent Americans.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 00:41:42   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Angmo wrote:
Just remove them four and trump can fill the seats with decent Americans.


Trump will be history.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 01:39:15   #
Wrangler Loc: North Texas
 
Mr. Moore, in response to your previous post, I am responding.

The job of the Supreme Court is NOT to reflect the will of the people. It is to interpret the Constitution as written.

If the majority of people wanted women denied the right to vote, the Supreme Court would determine the legality of that law within the Constitution.

It is Congress that is supposed to reflect the will of the people. Each congress person is to reflect the will of his/her constituents.

Each of the three branches has its own responsibilities. Have you ever heard the term
“Separate but equal”?

Read the document.

Reply
 
 
Aug 15, 2019 01:45:38   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Wrangler wrote:
Mr. Moore:

The job of the Supreme Court is NOT to reflect the will of the people. It is to interpret the Constitution as written.

If the majority of people wanted women denied the right to vote, the Supreme Court would determine the legality of that law within the Constitution.

It is Congress that is supposed to reflect the will of the people. Each congress person is to reflect the will of his/her constituents.

Each of the three branches has its own responsibilities. Have you ever heard the term
“Separate but equal”?

Read the document.
Mr. Moore: br br The job of the Supreme Court is ... (show quote)


It’s well established that leftists don’t read much.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 01:55:45   #
EyeSawYou
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
It means that increasing size of Supreme Court will accurately reflect the wishes of the American public. They brought it on themselves.


You really have no clue on what the Supreme Court Justices Constitutional duty is do you? NO

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 06:34:25   #
Rose42
 
thom w wrote:
Rose, you think you are so well informed. Traditionally one could not accurately predict what a new justice would do. Earl warren was a Republican, appointed by a republican president. He is but one example.


Reading comprehension matters snide one. I didn’t say they always did.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 07:52:09   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
btbg wrote:
If you look, the four liberals always vote together. Three of the five "conservatives do not" so who is voting on party lines. Only the left.


bullshit, when it comes to corporate or political interest, the majority votes along party lines. why else do they work so hard to get "their" thinking people on the bench? the court should be neutral, so that all judgements are fair and impartial.

Reply
 
 
Aug 15, 2019 09:19:42   #
Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
It means that increasing size of Supreme Court will accurately reflect the wishes of the American public. They brought it on themselves.


The lesson the Democrats do not want to Learn is, Change the Law, Take the issue from the court and fashion a body of LAW that you claim is what ALL the GOOD people want.

That is the Job of the Legislature, not to tell the Court how to perform their job!

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 09:41:08   #
Angmo
 
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
The lesson the Democrats do not want to Learn is, Change the Law, Take the issue from the court and fashion a body of LAW that you claim is what ALL the GOOD people want.

That is the Job of the Legislature, not to tell the Court how to perform their job!


Evil leftie Dems cannot win in the arena of ideas, debate, truth or fact. So they try to stack the courts with other evil leftie Dems.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 10:38:09   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
Wrangler wrote:
The dems threatened the Supreme Court by demanding it “heal itself or face restructuring.”

My question is “Does heal itself mean walk like a dog on a leash?”


The difference between the justices is some interpret constitutionally, the others don’t.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 11:15:17   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
Wrangler wrote:
The dems threatened the Supreme Court by demanding it “heal itself or face restructuring.”

My question is “Does heal itself mean walk like a dog on a leash?”


Yep!

Reply
 
 
Aug 15, 2019 11:32:06   #
John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
Former President Franklin Roosevelt put forward a measure to ‘pack’ the SCOTUS. It would be instructive to read up on what happened.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 11:34:04   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
John_F wrote:
Former President Franklin Roosevelt put forward a measure to ‘pack’ the SCOTUS. It would be instructive to read up on what happened.


He appointed a KKK member to the court instead.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 12:23:47   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Wrangler wrote:
Mr. Moore, in response to your previous post, I am responding.

The job of the Supreme Court is NOT to reflect the will of the people. It is to interpret the Constitution as written.

If the majority of people wanted women denied the right to vote, the Supreme Court would determine the legality of that law within the Constitution.

It is Congress that is supposed to reflect the will of the people. Each congress person is to reflect the will of his/her constituents.

Each of the three branches has its own responsibilities. Have you ever heard the term
“Separate but equal”?

Read the document.
Mr. Moore, in response to your previous post, I a... (show quote)


Well, since the “interpretation” can be more than one direction, it will be no problem to appoint justices with the “people’s interpretation”. As opposed to the fascist conservative libertarian “interpretation”.
And with Dems having all three branches, they will be equal.

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 12:26:36   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Angmo wrote:
Evil leftie Dems cannot win in the arena of ideas, debate, truth or fact. So they try to stack the courts with other evil leftie Dems.


And when Repubs could not win in the arena of ideas, debate, truth or fact, they refused to allow a vote on Garland. Stacking is stacking, just a different way to accomplish the same thing.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.