I think I hit on a cerebral image rather than a grab-you graphic image. My original idea was to collapse as many images of fireflies as I could take in 20 minutes into one. This image is what I ended up with. The image conveys the number of fireflies but has, to me, no focus (maybe it shouldn't?). I'd be interested in comments on how to improve the graphic representation of the idea.
Technical details: Nikon D7100, 18mm lens, mostly f22 and near the 20 minute mark, f11. As the light changed, so did the f stop; times varied from 8 secs to 20 secs; number of images, 110.
Well, to my eye, at first glance it looks like an old slide that has been damaged with a lot of scratches…
saidel42 wrote:
I think I hit on a cerebral image rather than a grab-you graphic image. My original idea was to collapse as many images of fireflies as I could take in 20 minutes into one. This image is what I ended up with. The image conveys the number of fireflies but has, to me, no focus (maybe it shouldn't?). I'd be interested in comments on how to improve the graphic representation of the idea.
Technical details: Nikon D7100, 18mm lens, mostly f22 and near the 20 minute mark, f11. As the light changed, so did the f stop; times varied from 8 secs to 20 secs; number of images, 110.
I think I hit on a cerebral image rather than a gr... (
show quote)
This looks so much better after downloading. I have pushed exposure, contrast, shadows, blacks and whites, all just a bit except shadows and blacks but not so much blacks. this all brings the background out. I think the idea is good but the fireflies won't mean much to anyone except yourself and isn't that who you should be pleasing anyway?
Send a copy to any competition that is run by RPS, UK. To them, it will look like a winner>
You don't have to settle for the softness of the original.
.
What is RPS, UK? and tell me more....
What you are experiencing is similar to star trails where stars don't look round because the exposure time is too long. What I would try is to use a tripod and lower your exposure time to where the lightning bugs looked round. Then take a number of pics and merge them together. Also, you can make your aperture large to let in more light. I would start with the lens wide open like I would for stars. With an 18mm lens your depth of field should extend from a few feet away to infinity. You could always use the Photoshop self healing brush to eliminate any bugs that get too close to the lens and obscure the view, or just eliminate those pics from the stack. Actually, some out of focus bugs (blobs of light) would add to the general ambiance of the pic.
RPS, is the Royal Photographic Society (HQ in UK). They run competitions throughout the year, eg. Members monthly (Themed) competition.
I think you did quite well. R.G. did well also, like them both especially the sharper more colorful result.
First, since I moved from Indianapolis in the 70s I have missed Fireflys.
Second, I think you have hit on a great concept and should continue to explore the opportunities
Third, I like your original image and I don't believe every image needs a focal point and this one certainly need not have one.
R.G. wrote:
You don't have to settle for the softness of the original.
.
If I hadn't said it before, I am now. I like what you did.
I'll do it to the next day's attempt. Thanks for the clue.
Bill
saidel42 wrote:
If I hadn't said it before, I am now. I like what you did.
I'll do it to the next day's attempt. Thanks for the clue.
Bill
Thanks. It's good fun to experiment with shots like this. There's so many options for adding drama, especially if you're willing to go surreal.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.