Chickened out of FX BUT !
May 21, 2019 23:46:15 #
Gene51 wrote:
It looks like the flash is near or on the camera, and directly aimed at the cat.
Try bounce light - much more flattering.
Try bounce light - much more flattering.
Very nice, Gene …
Pretty Pussy Pics!!!!
May 22, 2019 06:47:19 #
Chris T wrote:
Oh, really? … I didn't realize Yongnuo - had updated their 685 model.
What output are you getting from this newer one? …
What's the Guide Number?
What output are you getting from this newer one? …
What's the Guide Number?
60 it says inbuilt 2.4 receiver.
May 22, 2019 06:48:54 #
Chris T wrote:
Very nice, Gene …
Pretty Pussy Pics!!!!
Pretty Pussy Pics!!!!
Yes it was on camera but with bender type defuser fitted,yes,the off camera and also bounce/softbox photos to come.
May 22, 2019 06:51:37 #
Chris T wrote:
Wow, Graham!!!! … Matilda looks quite austere in this shot … are you sure that's what you want?
She's about four shades lighter, there, in your Avatar …
OR, is THIS - a different cat, Graham?
She's about four shades lighter, there, in your Avatar …
OR, is THIS - a different cat, Graham?
Yes,I,m aware she appears under exposed I was after Whatever the set up produced, while mearly observing what the flash and bender produced ,warts and all, there will be off camera bounce and or softbox photos being taken when time and cat allows .
Graham
May 22, 2019 10:38:58 #
siamesecatmanuk wrote:
Yes,I,m aware she appears under exposed I was after Whatever the set up produced, while mearly observing what the flash and bender produced ,warts and all, there will be off camera bounce and or softbox photos being taken when time and cat allows .
Graham
Graham
When Matilda ALLOWS - huh, Graham? … er … Right!
So, tell me - how many warts does Matilda have?
Graham - take a look at Gene's Pussy Pics … Bounce seems to work well there - ok?
May 22, 2019 10:49:30 #
siamesecatmanuk wrote:
60 it says inbuilt 2.4 receiver.
60 sounds kinda low … is that in feet or meters?
2.4 is the wavelength, the transmitter sends its signals on …
Doesn't tell me anything about the power of the unit.
BTW, Graham - the Guide Number of the original YN-685 is 197' ...
May 23, 2019 03:54:16 #
Gene51 wrote:
It looks like the flash is near or on the camera, and directly aimed at the cat.
Try bounce light - much more flattering.
Try bounce light - much more flattering.
Yes,absolutely agree ,bounce and soft boxes /defusers and other ideas in the pipe line.
It's a learning curves.many thanks for the pics lovely cats.
May 23, 2019 04:00:30 #
Chris T wrote:
When Matilda ALLOWS - huh, Graham? … er … Right!
So, tell me - how many warts does Matilda have?
Graham - take a look at Gene's Pussy Pics … Bounce seems to work well there - ok?
So, tell me - how many warts does Matilda have?
Graham - take a look at Gene's Pussy Pics … Bounce seems to work well there - ok?
Yes,no cooperation from Matilda no photo !!!! Period !!!
Warts,ha ha wasn't a literal statement as I,m sure you know !!! Maybe this mornings cat breakfast !
Yes, I have already agreed that Genes bounce photos look great ,bounce and or softboxes and or umberellas are all in the pipeline time allowing,as well as Matilda.
May 23, 2019 05:15:25 #
Chris T wrote:
60 sounds kinda low … is that in feet or meters?
2.4 is the wavelength, the transmitter sends its signals on …
Doesn't tell me anything about the power of the unit.
BTW, Graham - the Guide Number of the original YN-685 is 197' ...
2.4 is the wavelength, the transmitter sends its signals on …
Doesn't tell me anything about the power of the unit.
BTW, Graham - the Guide Number of the original YN-685 is 197' ...
Checking up on the guide number output ,watch this space
May 23, 2019 08:12:02 #
siamesecatmanuk wrote:
Yes,no cooperation from Matilda no photo !!!! Period !!!
Warts,ha ha wasn't a literal statement as I,m sure you know !!! Maybe this mornings cat breakfast !
Yes, I have already agreed that Genes bounce photos look great ,bounce and or softboxes and or umberellas are all in the pipeline time allowing,as well as Matilda.
Warts,ha ha wasn't a literal statement as I,m sure you know !!! Maybe this mornings cat breakfast !
Yes, I have already agreed that Genes bounce photos look great ,bounce and or softboxes and or umberellas are all in the pipeline time allowing,as well as Matilda.
They do, don't they, Graham? … Some of the best pussy pics I've ever seen.
Not to demean your own work, Graham … but, you have to agree - a little on the dark side - right?
However, that said - I should point out - the Nikon D7100 - is standing you in GREAT stead - is it not?
May 23, 2019 08:13:31 #
siamesecatmanuk wrote:
Checking up on the guide number output ,watch this space
Okay, Graham - take your time … no rush!!!!
May 23, 2019 08:17:00 #
siamesecatmanuk wrote:
Yes,no cooperation from Matilda no photo !!!! Period !!!
Warts,ha ha wasn't a literal statement as I,m sure you know !!! Maybe this mornings cat breakfast !
Yes, I have already agreed that Genes bounce photos look great ,bounce and or softboxes and or umberellas are all in the pipeline time allowing,as well as Matilda.
Warts,ha ha wasn't a literal statement as I,m sure you know !!! Maybe this mornings cat breakfast !
Yes, I have already agreed that Genes bounce photos look great ,bounce and or softboxes and or umberellas are all in the pipeline time allowing,as well as Matilda.
You need train Matilda better, Graham …
Explain to her - Time Waits for NO man, nor CAT. YOU are the master. Don't let her forget that!
May 23, 2019 08:53:35 #
Chris T wrote:
You need train Matilda better, Graham …
Explain to her - Time Waits for NO man, nor CAT. YOU are the master. Don't let her forget that!
Explain to her - Time Waits for NO man, nor CAT. YOU are the master. Don't let her forget that!
Yeah right ! Not he he 🙀
May 23, 2019 08:54:01 #
Chris T wrote:
Okay, Graham - take your time … no rush!!!!
No rush left in me !,,,😿
May 23, 2019 08:56:39 #
Chris T wrote:
They do, don't they, Graham? … Some of the best pussy pics I've ever seen.
Not to demean your own work, Graham … but, you have to agree - a little on the dark side - right?
However, that said - I should point out - the Nikon D7100 - is standing you in GREAT stead - is it not?
Not to demean your own work, Graham … but, you have to agree - a little on the dark side - right?
However, that said - I should point out - the Nikon D7100 - is standing you in GREAT stead - is it not?
Hopefully I shall get somewhere near them ,eventually !!!
Yes it is dark on the cats coat for certain versions 2/3/4/5?.. will improve I,m sure 🙀
Yes the camera is producing the goods its all down to lighting,though I know I haven't got it right YET !!!
G
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.