gofast wrote:
I went back to college to learn how to be better with the DSLR. (Was a film guy for 30 years). As you all know, there's a lot to learn.
That being said, my instructor does quite a bit using a light meter when composing shots for flash/portrait photography. The meter he uses costs about $240.
Does anyone know of an affordable light meter? I don't plan on going into portraiture, and wonder if I even need one when all I'll be using is a speed light. There will be times I'll be doing favors for friends & family taking family or holiday pix, but that's about it
Your advice please.
Old Rookie (lol)
I went back to college to learn how to be better w... (
show quote)
What type of hand-held light meter you need (or whether you need one at all)
depends on the type of photography you do and how you prefer to work.
For example, as you probably know, cinematographers wouldn't consider using anything
but a incident light meter. That's because the light on an actress's face is very important--
so you want to hold that meter right up to that famous face.. In the old days, most used the
Norton Director.
Continuing with ancient history: Zone System photographers were incredibly fond of
Weston meters -- this may be because the Weston had a range of ten stops on its dial--
and guess how many zones ther are in Ansel Adam's original system. Plus, you could
buy a special version of the meterlabeled in Zones! Later, they became attached to
Pentax spotmeters.
News flash: different photographers still need different equipment!
Types of hand-held light meters for photography:
* Reflected light (luminance)
-- averaging
-- spot
* Incident light (illuminance)
-- continuous
-- flash
These days, a meter that can measure incident light, flash incident light, and
reflected light isn't much more expensive than a plain reflected light meter.
(The only job it can't do is spot meter.)
Regardless of type, light meters vary in:
* Sensitivity
* Graunlarity
* Linearity
* Range (some have dual ranges for more accuracy)
* Unit of measure
Historically, technology also varies:
1. Extinction meters
2. Photovoltaic --no battery, but not very sensitive
1. Selenium (doesn't age well--sometimes can be rejuvenated)
2. Silicon
3. Photoresitive -- requires a battery
1. Cadmium sulfide (some last, some fail with age)
2. Silicon
Today they are all silicon photoresistor and require a battery.
Finally, user interfaces vary:
1. Indicator needle and mechanical dial cacluator
2. Digital display
a. Without a microprocessor
b. With a microprocessor
All lightmeters are analog. Digital displays are no guarantee of accuracy
(or even of granularity: a meter that displays tenths of an EV may increment
in units of 0.3 EV!).
As with camers, some people always want the latest one. Which means you
can often get a deal on last year's model, either new-old-stock or used.
I bought a used Sekonic L-308b FlashMate used because I wanted a smaller meter,
and it works fine. It doesn't allow me to take a reading, then step though different
aperture/shutter pairs. (In some ways, you can't beat a lightmeter with a dial caculator!)
I also own lightmeters from Gossen, Pentax, Minolta, Vivitar, Agfa, Weston and GE
(the latter two now just keepsakes).
Light meter photocells do drift over time, so an older meter may be out of
calibration. Most are fairly easy to calibrate, though usually only one-point
calibration is available. All you have to do is find another meter of the same
brand that you trust, and a featureless wall that is uniformly illuminated.
If you shoot several different cameras, then a handheld meter will give you
the same EV readings all the time. Different brands of camera are calibrated
differently, and most cameras havent' been calibrated since they left the
factory. And if it's an interchangable lens camera, then different lenses
absorb different amounts of light -- good for autoexposure, bad if you
want an EV reading.
The came for using the camera's built-in light meter is compelling:
* it's always there
* automatically takes into account filter factor
* automatically takes into account light absoprtion by lens ("t-stop")--
important when you go from a 3-element achromat to a 33-element zoom
log-of-glass.
But there are some things you just can't do without a hand held light meter:
For example, in portraiture, if you want to measure the lighting ratio of two
continues lights, you need either an incident light meter or a set of special
gray cards (such as Kodak used to sell). But if you want to measure the
ratio of two flashes, only a flash meter will do. Of course, most photographers
never actually measure light ratios--it depends on how you work.
The are orther things that camera meters just don't do well:
* Taking incident light readings (gray card method suck)
* Taking spot meter readings (spot meter mode sucks)
Anyone who can take an incident light reading using a gray card without shading
the card has a career awating him as a circus contortionist. And gray cards are
flat, so really don't measure what a incident light meter dome would measure
(ah, the Weston V "Invacone" dome -- how good it was!).
Moreover, the standard 18% gray card is the wrong reflectivity to match luminiance
meter readings (as Kodak stated in the instructions to its original gray card, you need
to subtract about half a stop. Yuck.)
In landscape photography, nothing really replaces a hand-held spotmeter. Th
Spot meter mode in cameras is a joke: you can never be sure what angle
it is measuring. But a 2% hand-held spot meter always measure 2%.
It's very cumbersome to take several spot meter readings with a camera.
A hand-held spotmeter is like aiming a pistol. It's still the only way to
really know the exposure challenge you are facing.
The best way I can describe the process of taking a phtograph is as a dialogue
between the photographer and his instruments.. If you don't ask the right questions
in the right order, you'll never arrive at the correct answer. One of the most
important questions are:
"What challenges dos this scene present for exposure?"
A hand-held spot meter will allow you to answer that quesion (provided you
know the dyanmic range of your sensor and of your medium of your final
image) 'Cause like the Great Man said, what really matters is the final image,
so you have to visualize what you want.
Possible answers to the above question include any or all of:
* backlighting
* extremely contrasty
* some area (such as a skin tone) that must be placed on a certain tone
* a particular dark shadow in which you need to see detail
* a particular bright highlight in which you need to see detail
So really it comes down to control. Putting the camera in manual exposure mode
doesn't really put you in control unless you have some way of getting the information
you need. The camera's meter's really isn't designed to do that (at least, not as its
primary function) -- it's desgned to measure what autoexposure needs.
And as you know, the goal of autoexposure is to place whatever it meters (average,
spot or matrix) on a middle tone. What else can it do? It doesn't know what it's
looking at and it can't read the photographer's mind. It has no idea what you plan
to do with the image. It's just machine (and far less intelligent than a mouse).
Consider all that, autoexposure works extraordinarliy well. And autoexposure plus
exposure compenstation works ever better. But you still need information about
the scene lighting--and the naked eye is the worst light meter of all: it can only see
10 stops of contrast at a time, and cannot distinguish between different dark tones.
So think of a light meter as a sort of "lie detector": it will tell you when your eyes are
lying, and sometimes it will tell you when your camera's meter is lying.
Recommendations
For a compact luminance/iluminance/flash meter with digital interface and micrprocessor,
the latest Sekonic FlashMate would do the job. Or buy an older model used. (There are
better flashmeters, but they are very pricey.)
For an needle and dial calculator luminance illuminance meter (with battery), you have
many good choices--but only a few still in production. So I'd probably buy used meters
for cheap until you find one you like (Just make sure the batteries are still available: some
of the older ones were dsigned for mercury batteries.)
For a spot meter with digital display and microprocessor, I'd recomment an old Minolta M
(it allows you to split the difference between two readings!) or Pentax Digital Spotmeter.
For an all-analog spotmeter, I'd recommend the old Pentax Spotmeter V.