Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
making sense out out filters
Sep 2, 2011 15:35:12   #
Kathi Loc: Pennsylvania
 
I recently purchased a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens for my Nikon D700. I've been spending so much time reading reviews for the type of filter to put on this that I'm now more confused than when I started. Anybody have any of their own suggestions as to type or manufacturer? My primary use of this lens will be for shooting theatre productions in low light conditions and no flash. Thanks!

Reply
Sep 2, 2011 16:01:17   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
I would suggest an UV filter. Then for those outdoor times a circular polarizer filter (I use a CP indoors as well, but it will increase exposure time).
As for a manufacture, there several that make good filters. The one thing that is important is that the filters be multicoated.
With all the adjustments that DSLR have, filters that change the hue of the light I have not found necessary. However, Neutral Density filters are helpful--maybe not for your low light situation.

Reply
Sep 3, 2011 07:27:36   #
photocat Loc: Atlanta, Ga
 
this is going to be one of those "coke vs pepsi" discussion.

Years ago with film UV filters had some importance in specific conditions. These days with digital cameras the camera comes with UV abilities that are built in the program.

Some people feel that the filter will protect the lens, others don't use them as they will degrade the quality of the image.

However, if you are doing a lot of shooting in a dusty, sand ladle environment it could be helpful, but it comes with the price of effecting image quality and decrease saturation.

So, you need to make a decision which camp you want to fall into.

Be sure you use the lens hood that came with that lens, as it will decrease the opprotunity for flare to create problems for you.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2011 08:18:20   #
Chris
 
I do have a CP for certain aps but I do keep a filter on my lens and glad I did. Many years ago there was a freak occurance where a rock got thrown up and hit the front of my lens. Fortunately it cost me under 20 to fix rather then whatever a new lens would cost

Reply
Sep 3, 2011 13:43:19   #
verbbaitum Loc: Sidney, NE (for now)
 
I use a UV filter on all my lens because it protects them. Cheaper to replace a $20 filter than a $1,000 lens.

Reply
Sep 3, 2011 14:33:55   #
Kathi Loc: Pennsylvania
 
Thanks. This is helpful info as I do keep a filter on all my other lenses to protect, but was wondering about the necessity, or role of the CP and the ND. I'm taking from these suggestions that they won't be particulary helpful or needed for my theatre shoots, but perhaps when I do some outdoor sessions. For example, I have a daytime college football shoot in a few weeks, so perhaps there is a time/place to use something different like the ND. What do any of you suggest for this particular event?
And, again, thanks for your input!!

Reply
Sep 3, 2011 14:46:06   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
Caution might be in order if using CP or ND to get action photos as these filters will increase exposure time (they decrease light, but do not change it). In other words, unless it is a bright day, you may not be able to get fast enough shutter speed to stop the action in the photo (if desired). With long exsposures the need for a monopod or tripod increases.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.