Way behind on my photo processing. Just starting the images from our Costa Rica trip last November. These shots are two views of the same bird. Do you have a preference? When the first image was taken, he (Olive-crowned Yellowthroat) was singing in response to a play back from our guide, Chambita. The bird was looking directly at us providing an engaging image, but with DOF problems. After the initial recording was played, the bird continued to sing on his own for 60 seconds. The back ground was pretty "busy" with a lot of sticks and leaves (this was in the rainforest after all), so I applied a selective blur to the BG. Otherwise the images were processed in PS with the BG slightly darkened and the bird slightly brightened.
I have a "weakness" for yellow birds. My favorite color!
Taken with a Canon R5, 600 mm f/4.0 lens off a tripod from a boat at Cano Negro, Costa Rica.
bajadreamer wrote:
Way behind on my photo processing. Just starting the images from our Costa Rica trip last November. These shots are two views of the same bird. Do you have a preference? When the first image was taken, he (Olive-crowned Yellowthroat) was singing in response to a play back from our guide, Chambita. The bird was looking directly at us providing an engaging image, but with DOF problems. After the initial recording was played, the bird continued to sing on his own for 60 seconds. The back ground was pretty "busy" with a lot of sticks and leaves (this was in the rainforest after all), so I applied a selective blur to the BG. Otherwise the images were processed in PS with the BG slightly darkened and the bird slightly brightened.
I have a "weakness" for yellow birds. My favorite color!
Taken with a Canon R5, 600 mm f/4.0 lens off a tripod from a boat at Cano Negro, Costa Rica.
Way behind on my photo processing. Just starting ... (
show quote)
Both are good. I would like the second one cropped a little too make the bird about the size of the first. But I like both poses.
Tough choice. I'll take #2. #1 needs a little more depth of field. I've been to Cano Negro too.
I like them both also. And I agree, #2 is the nicer photo with more DOF.
#2 for me. I just prefer the profile a little more.
Great set, Dreamer, I too prefer #2.
I agree about #2 being a little better and could stand cropping a bit.
But both are good
47greyfox
Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
I’m also jumping on #2. But, like others, like both. And… for pretty much the same reason, slightly deeper DOF in #2, and it’s a nicer, more engaging catch. Well done!
frankraney wrote:
Both are good. I would like the second one cropped a little too make the bird about the size of the first. But I like both poses.
Thank you for your thoughts. I debated going with a portrait crop of the 2nd image. I will try that.
MountainDave wrote:
Tough choice. I'll take #2. #1 needs a little more depth of field. I've been to Cano Negro too.
Nice place to photograph!?!
I agree with you about the DOF. Was dark under the canopy so required as much light as I could get. Sometimes I do try focus bracketing on static birds, but this was from a boat so-"no way".
Retired CPO wrote:
I like them both also. And I agree, #2 is the nicer photo with more DOF.
That does help, doesn't it?
kpmac wrote:
#2 for me. I just prefer the profile a little more.
Sometimes I do too, but I also like the feeling of engagement that the 1st image projects. I do wish the feet and legs were in focus.
jdtonkinson wrote:
I agree about #2 being a little better and could stand cropping a bit.
But both are good
Seems to be the consensus.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.