Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon DSLR
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Mar 27, 2023 08:58:33   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
BebuLamar wrote:
When I bought my first Nikon in 1977, Nikon already had a lens incompatibiliy issue that year. Nikon introduced the AI lenses and although the new AI lenses can be used on older cameras the lenses made before that wouldn't meter on camera made after that year. You would have to send the lens to Nikon for a retrofit.
When Nikon introduced the Nikon FA there was another incompatibility issue. The standard AI lenses would work with the FA but it has to redo the meter after stopping down and adjust the shutter speed. So Nikon had the new version of the lenses called AI-S. So although I am a long time Nikon user and like the Nikon they do have a lot of lens incompatibility issues.
When I bought my first Nikon in 1977, Nikon alread... (show quote)

The way things worked out, I am personally glad I picked a Canon EOS Elan when my other choice was a Nikon N7007.

Reply
Mar 27, 2023 19:50:57   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
And I went to my camera store 17 years ago specifically to buy an EOS 20D and came away with a D200 after discovering some significant ergonomic/usability issues with the Canon which the Nikon solved for me. Available technology progresses. Resisting changes in lens mounts is not too different from maintaining attachment to mirrors. (But it doesn't prevent taking pictures, either.)

There are occasionally some arguments here that grow out of meaningless nonsense and cluelessness, like the one last year when the Z30 was introduced specifically as a webcast camera and folks here all got their panties in a wad because, of all things, it didn't have a viewfinder. Come on...get a clue...this camera is not designed for you. It doesn't need a viewfinder for its designed purpose...it's just something to needlessly drain the battery.

If you take a breath and look carefully at Nikon's DSLR lineup, the camera models that were geared toward buyers that might have had older lenses were quite compatible with lenses dating back at least 25 or 30 years. They had focus motors and everything else necessary. The only problem is really with lenses that don't have an AI notch. Attempting to mount one of them will physically damage the AI lever. But I've had some of those antiques in the past, and there is no compelling need to even try to use one. The primary disincentive is the lack of coatings or coatings on insufficient surfaces or just bad coatings. (To be honest, the fact that those lenses will work on mirrorless cameras, whatever the choice of brand, is really quite a humorous oxymoron.)

The cameras that have the greatest constraints on lens compatibility are the 3xxx and 5xxx models. Guess what those are? They are entry-level cameras. As a retailer, just how many stockpiled lenses would you expect a beginner buying an entry-level camera to have sitting on the shelf? And if someone who isn't a beginner chooses one of those models either because of budget limitations or else just to save a few bucks chooses one of those cameras, where is the rationale for being offended that the lower-priced camera did not have all of the capability of the more expensive models?

And I would contest the statement that Nikon has been less than transparent concerning lens compatibility. The D40x that I bought for my wife in 2007 did not have a focus motor. Neither did the D40 (2006) which the D40x replaced in the lineup.

I understand that there are reasons to prefer one brand over another. Girls and women almost exclusively seem to prefer Canon. Variety is good. Distortion is not.

Reply
Mar 27, 2023 20:17:48   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
larryepage wrote:
And I went to my camera store 17 years ago specifically to buy an EOS 20D and came away with a D200 after discovering some significant ergonomic/usability issues with the Canon which the Nikon solved for me. Available technology progresses. Resisting changes in lens mounts is not too different from maintaining attachment to mirrors. (But it doesn't prevent taking pictures, either.)

There are occasionally some arguments here that grow out of meaningless nonsense and cluelessness, like the one last year when the Z30 was introduced specifically as a webcast camera and folks here all got their panties in a wad because, of all things, it didn't have a viewfinder. Come on...get a clue...this camera is not designed for you. It doesn't need a viewfinder for its designed purpose...it's just something to needlessly drain the battery.

If you take a breath and look carefully at Nikon's DSLR lineup, the camera models that were geared toward buyers that might have had older lenses were quite compatible with lenses dating back at least 25 or 30 years. They had focus motors and everything else necessary. The only problem is really with lenses that don't have an AI notch. Attempting to mount one of them will physically damage the AI lever. But I've had some of those antiques in the past, and there is no compelling need to even try to use one. The primary disincentive is the lack of coatings or coatings on insufficient surfaces or just bad coatings. (To be honest, the fact that those lenses will work on mirrorless cameras, whatever the choice of brand, is really quite a humorous oxymoron.)

The cameras that have the greatest constraints on lens compatibility are the 3xxx and 5xxx models. Guess what those are? They are entry-level cameras. As a retailer, just how many stockpiled lenses would you expect a beginner buying an entry-level camera to have sitting on the shelf? And if someone who isn't a beginner chooses one of those models either because of budget limitations or else just to save a few bucks chooses one of those cameras, where is the rationale for being offended that the lower-priced camera did not have all of the capability of the more expensive models?

And I would contest the statement that Nikon has been less than transparent concerning lens compatibility. The D40x that I bought for my wife in 2007 did not have a focus motor. Neither did the D40 (2006) which it replaced.

I understand that there are reasons to prefer one brand over another. Girls and women almost exclusively seem to prefer Canon. Variety is good. Distortion is not.
And I went to my camera store 17 years ago specifi... (show quote)


Great job my friend! BRAVO!!!

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2023 21:03:20   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
larryepage wrote:
And I went to my camera store 17 years ago specifically to buy an EOS 20D and came away with a D200 after discovering some significant ergonomic/usability issues with the Canon which the Nikon solved for me. Available technology progresses. Resisting changes in lens mounts is not too different from maintaining attachment to mirrors. (But it doesn't prevent taking pictures, either.)

There are occasionally some arguments here that grow out of meaningless nonsense and cluelessness, like the one last year when the Z30 was introduced specifically as a webcast camera and folks here all got their panties in a wad because, of all things, it didn't have a viewfinder. Come on...get a clue...this camera is not designed for you. It doesn't need a viewfinder for its designed purpose...it's just something to needlessly drain the battery.

If you take a breath and look carefully at Nikon's DSLR lineup, the camera models that were geared toward buyers that might have had older lenses were quite compatible with lenses dating back at least 25 or 30 years. They had focus motors and everything else necessary. The only problem is really with lenses that don't have an AI notch. Attempting to mount one of them will physically damage the AI lever. But I've had some of those antiques in the past, and there is no compelling need to even try to use one. The primary disincentive is the lack of coatings or coatings on insufficient surfaces or just bad coatings. (To be honest, the fact that those lenses will work on mirrorless cameras, whatever the choice of brand, is really quite a humorous oxymoron.)

The cameras that have the greatest constraints on lens compatibility are the 3xxx and 5xxx models. Guess what those are? They are entry-level cameras. As a retailer, just how many stockpiled lenses would you expect a beginner buying an entry-level camera to have sitting on the shelf? And if someone who isn't a beginner chooses one of those models either because of budget limitations or else just to save a few bucks chooses one of those cameras, where is the rationale for being offended that the lower-priced camera did not have all of the capability of the more expensive models?

And I would contest the statement that Nikon has been less than transparent concerning lens compatibility. The D40x that I bought for my wife in 2007 did not have a focus motor. Neither did the D40 (2006) which the D40x replaced in the lineup.

I understand that there are reasons to prefer one brand over another. Girls and women almost exclusively seem to prefer Canon. Variety is good. Distortion is not.
And I went to my camera store 17 years ago specifi... (show quote)



What Your Favorite Camera Brand Says About You

Nikon
The Nikon photographer is probably a mature female working in IT, fashion, or architecture. Being physically active is important to her so when she goes on holiday she likes to “go off the beaten track”. She’s youthful, friendly and loving. Although, she can suffer from being overly careful, lonely, and insecure. She prioritizes spending time with her family.

Her favorite tv shows are Grey’s Anatomy, Glee and Antiques Roadshow. Surprisingly, the Nikon photographer loves every movie in the Star Wars series!

She likes to try her hand at motorsports and winter games such as skiing. And if she had a pet on her lap on it would most likely be a happy little feline friend.


Canon
According to the stats, a Canon photographer is most likely to be an engineer, an interior designer or an architect. He’s a mature individual. His favorite hobbies: photography, reading non-fiction and traveling.

He’s interested in radio, exhibitions and technology. If he was to have a pet it would be a low maintenance fish. He has a taste for science fiction movies such as 2001: A Space Odyssey and Blade Runner.


https://www.format.com/magazine/features/photography/best-camera-brand-personality




---

Reply
Mar 27, 2023 21:15:49   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
A woman's brand of camera tells you more about her than her perfume.

Reply
Mar 27, 2023 21:30:22   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
Bill_de wrote:
What Your Favorite Camera Brand Says About You

Nikon
The Nikon photographer is probably a mature female working in IT, fashion, or architecture. Being physically active is important to her so when she goes on holiday she likes to “go off the beaten track”. She’s youthful, friendly and loving. Although, she can suffer from being overly careful, lonely, and insecure. She prioritizes spending time with her family.

Her favorite tv shows are Grey’s Anatomy, Glee and Antiques Roadshow. Surprisingly, the Nikon photographer loves every movie in the Star Wars series!

She likes to try her hand at motorsports and winter games such as skiing. And if she had a pet on her lap on it would most likely be a happy little feline friend.


Canon
According to the stats, a Canon photographer is most likely to be an engineer, an interior designer or an architect. He’s a mature individual. His favorite hobbies: photography, reading non-fiction and traveling.

He’s interested in radio, exhibitions and technology. If he was to have a pet it would be a low maintenance fish. He has a taste for science fiction movies such as 2001: A Space Odyssey and Blade Runner.


https://www.format.com/magazine/features/photography/best-camera-brand-personality




---
b color=blue What Your Favorite Camera Brand Say... (show quote)


Hmmmmmmm!

This is way backward from how things are in my neck of the woods. I do not recall ever seeing anyone that I knew was an engineer carrying a Canon. And that includes me, even though I came to Nikon indirectly.

Reply
Mar 27, 2023 23:58:23   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
larryepage wrote:
Hmmmmmmm!

This is way backward from how things are in my neck of the woods. I do not recall ever seeing anyone that I knew was an engineer carrying a Canon. And that includes me, even though I came to Nikon indirectly.

At one time, my job title had the word “engineer” in it {no, it had nothing to do with sewage} and I did carry a Canon when I got it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 30, 2023 02:21:27   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
BebuLamar wrote:
It's Tony Northrup said so. I am not sure because I didn't watch the whole video. But it's here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ejnUjfG7kE


The make lens maker A to camera maker B adaptors. Sony E to Nikon Z for example.
“ The Techart adapters do something truly amazing - they take almost any vintage lens, including lenses for Leica M, Nikon F, and Canon EF, and add autofocus capabilites to them when connected to your Sony E or Nikon Z mirrorless cameras. It works, and it's life changing.”

However looking at Techart’s web page I did not see any Nikon F adaptors.

The adaptor doesn’t utilize the lens autofocus mechanism. It moves the lens in and out, closer or farther from The sensor. The adaptor doesn’t track and it’s not good for video, but (Tony says) it works good for still shots. Tony liked being able to use older vintage lenses with a modern camera and have the ability to autofocus.

The manuf is TechArt and a link to their home is below:
https://techartpro.com/?post_type=product

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.