For me, keeping things simple is exceedingly more effective than being a technocrat, ideologist, bureaucrat, careerist, or functionary, especially when inspiring someone less- skilled. I am more interested in the image results than the gear. I do not think mirror-less cameras add much to the outcome of an image, but more and more the convenience is hard to denigh. I do not care for live view personally, but have owned several Fuji mirror-less cameras with view- finder options, so that is really not a problem. I will buy the mirror-less replacement for the 1DX MK3 when it arrives, but for now the performance is outstanding with my current 1DX line up... especially with the outstanding face/ eye detection (in the view finder), and the mirror up corner- to- corner focus range. I may purchase a new Hasselblad X2D for landscape soon, so hopefully I comes across as someone not biased to a single brand. There is no one- fits- all camera for everyone in my oppinion, and the Nikon/ Canon/ Sony image quality battles have little meaning for me. I do prefer Canons color science, but respect for the resultant image from any brand. More and more, new techno- gear... or the- lack- of can have less meaning if you cosider the latest post prossesing software.
Pixel- quality trumps pixel- count, and many times an over abundance can be a negative. Pixels are only hypothetical math- based estimate of a sensors dimensions, so if a mirror-less or DLSR camera has a superior sensor, then nothing but applause. Gear may make us great, but education and skill can make us greater...
…welcome to the diverse world of the Hog…be sure to go to the bottom of the page and click on “all sections” and join as many as you like…!
... meanwhile somewhere in Norway wrote:
For me, keeping things simple is exceedingly more effective than being a technocrat, ideologist, bureaucrat, careerist, or functionary, especially when inspiring someone less- skilled. I am more interested in the image results than the gear. I do not think mirror-less cameras add much to the outcome of an image, but more and more the convenience is hard to denigh. I do not care for live view personally, but have owned several Fuji mirror-less cameras with view- finder options, so that is really not a problem. I will buy the mirror-less replacement for the 1DX MK3 when it arrives, but for now the performance is outstanding with my current 1DX line up... especially with the outstanding face/ eye detection (in the view finder), and the mirror up corner- to- corner focus range. I may purchase a new Hasselblad X2D for landscape soon, so hopefully I comes across as someone not biased to a single brand. There is no one- fits- all camera for everyone in my oppinion, and the Nikon/ Canon/ Sony image quality battles have little meaning for me. I do prefer Canons color science, but respect for the resultant image from any brand. More and more, new techno- gear... or the- lack- of can have less meaning if you cosider the latest post prossesing software.
Pixel- quality trumps pixel- count, and many times an over abundance can be a negative. Pixels are only hypothetical math- based estimate of a sensors dimensions, so if a mirror-less or DLSR camera has a superior sensor, then nothing but applause. Gear may make us great, but education and skill can make us greater...
For me, keeping things simple is exceedingly more ... (
show quote)
LOL! You may not come across as anti-mirrorless or pro one brand but you do come across as someone who has $50,000 + to spend on to new Cameras and lenses.
Welcome to the Hog! Looking forward to seeing your contributions.
Welcome. Post and have fun.
Welcome to the Forum, enjoy.
Welcome to the forum. Looking forward to seeing some of your images.
Jack
Welcome to UHH, glad you joined us. Looking forward to seeing some of your images.
Don
jpgto
Loc: East Tennessee, Foot Hills of the Smokies
Welcome. Enjoy this amazing forum.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.