Montezuma Well, Arizona
Sep 25, 2022 10:20:43 #
Sep 25, 2022 10:42:42 #
Sep 25, 2022 10:45:15 #
Sep 25, 2022 11:30:24 #
Sep 25, 2022 13:57:16 #
Thanks, Mike. It was definitely a learning experience.
--Bob
--Bob
UTMike wrote:
Excellent work, Bob!
Sep 25, 2022 16:48:09 #
You need one heck of a bucket to pull the water out!!!
Now... It was definitely a learning experience. ???? s'plain.
Now... It was definitely a learning experience. ???? s'plain.
Sep 26, 2022 08:46:26 #
Rongn...., this panoramic photo is comprised of 78 individual RAW photos. Adjustments made in ACR on one and applied to all. That, in itself, can be a bit of a trick, as the scene ranges from dark shadow to bright sunlit walls. Once the suitable adjustment was determined and applied the RAW files needed to be converted to .tif format for stitching. After stitching, which took a considerable length of time, making minor adjustments in Ps was a hit-and-miss situation. Some of the tools I use in Ps apparently don't work on files of that size. So, other methods had to be tried. All-in-all it was a lot of hours to produce this result.
--Bob
--Bob
Rongnongno wrote:
You need one heck of a bucket to pull the water out!!!
Now... It was definitely a learning experience. ???? s'plain.
Now... It was definitely a learning experience. ???? s'plain.
Sep 26, 2022 11:58:26 #
rmalarz wrote:
Rongn...., this panoramic photo is comprised of 78... (show quote)
Why so many subs? You didn't have a wide-angle lens with you?
bwa
Sep 26, 2022 12:06:58 #
A good question. The reason was using a moderate telephoto lens would allow for more details in the distant portions of the scene. The automated panorama head is weight limited. If it weren't, I'd have used a lot longer focal length lens and taken an appropriate larger number of individual photographs. Additionally, the longer lens would have a narrower depth of field. Thus, 105mm, or thereabouts, seems suitable for the results I wanted.
To use a wide-angle lens would have required one with about 120+ degrees angle of view. This could lead to unwanted distortion.
--Bob
To use a wide-angle lens would have required one with about 120+ degrees angle of view. This could lead to unwanted distortion.
--Bob
bwana wrote:
Why so many subs? You didn't have a wide-angle lens with you?
bwa
bwa
Sep 26, 2022 13:06:51 #
rmalarz wrote:
--Bob
Very nice end result! Does this have anything to do with revenge???
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Sep 26, 2022 13:30:57 #
rmalarz wrote:
.../... Some of the tools I use in Ps apparently don't work on files of that size. .../...
--Bob
--Bob
The only issue I have with PS CC is that some tools/filters do not work when the image is higher than 8 bit. Which ones did not work in this scenario?
Sep 26, 2022 13:31:16 #
Thank you, Loren.
Perhaps if one drinks the water there they can find out.
--Bob
Perhaps if one drinks the water there they can find out.
--Bob
rlv567 wrote:
Very nice end result! Does this have anything to do with revenge???
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
Sep 26, 2022 13:44:49 #
You're correct about the greater than 8bit issue. I'm ok with that as most of the photos I process are 16bit. However, it's the size that can trip up Ps. I have to explore a bit more. This is the largest pano that I've ever tried to create to date.
There are several others that I use, external apps to Ps that don't seem to work with files that exceed 2GB.
--Bob
There are several others that I use, external apps to Ps that don't seem to work with files that exceed 2GB.
--Bob
Rongnongno wrote:
The only issue I have with PS CC is that some tools/filters do not work when the image is higher than 8 bit. Which ones did not work in this scenario?
Sep 26, 2022 14:28:43 #
Did you use the D850?
If so, I am not surprised. Many software titles are unable to deal with the massive raw files. For panoramas, I revert to the D500.
If so, I am not surprised. Many software titles are unable to deal with the massive raw files. For panoramas, I revert to the D500.
Sep 26, 2022 14:38:43 #
No. I use a D800 for these. I purchased a used one specifically to attach to the pano device and initial exposure settings. That's all it's used for.
Your mention of the massive RAW files is one of the reasons I don't use the D850 for these. I would consider attaching the D850 to the back of my view camera for Pano work using the shift stitch back I have for that.
--Bob
Your mention of the massive RAW files is one of the reasons I don't use the D850 for these. I would consider attaching the D850 to the back of my view camera for Pano work using the shift stitch back I have for that.
--Bob
Rongnongno wrote:
Did you use the D850?
If so, I am not surprised. Many software titles are unable to deal with the massive raw files. For panoramas, I revert to the D500.
If so, I am not surprised. Many software titles are unable to deal with the massive raw files. For panoramas, I revert to the D500.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.