I was getting ready to send a US model Nikon D5600 long out for a full spectrum IR conversion. The possibility of the camera needing repairs down the line occured to me so I sent Nikon an e-mail asking what their policy is on repairing conveerted cameras. Their prompt, as usual, answer was that they did not perform repairs on a camera that had been converted. Now I have to mull over whether to go ahead with the conversion knowing any camera failure would mean I have blown the $6-800 dollarvalue of the camera and conversion , or continue with the slow filter in front method. I've had no problems withe camera and one thought is to first send it to Nikon for a checkup and repair before having the conversion but that could add an appreciable amount to the investment. I am beginning to believe that the risk of losing the investment due to camera failure is simply the risk I have to take to get into the game, a risk that anyone converting to IR has to accept.

I was getting ready to send a US model Nikon D5600 long out for a full spectrum IR conversion. The possibility of the camera needing repairs down the line occured to me so I sent Nikon an e-mail asking what their policy is on repairing conveerted cameras. Their prompt, as usual, answer was that they did not perform repairs on a camera that had been converted. Now I have to mull over whether to go ahead with the conversion knowing any camera failure would mean I have blown the $6-800 dollarvalue of the camera and conversion , or continue with the slow filter in front method. I've had no problems withe camera and one thought is to first send it to Nikon for a checkup and repair before having the conversion but that could add an appreciable amount to the investment. I am beginning to believe that the risk of losing the investment due to camera failure is simply the risk I have to take to get into the game, a risk that anyone converting to IR has to accept.

First before spending lots of money see if you use IR often. I am very satisfied with my DIY conversion.

Kolarivision discusses selection of filters. Obviously all filters are desirable... so best to chose none "in-camera" and add filters externally... low-cost screw on filters**. Mine are 37mm. The conversion took about an hour and was simple 6 screws, and removing the "hot-filter" that shields the sensor from IR. The camera was an older Panasonic as discussed in the video.*** Screwdrivers are under $10, in fact, Dollar Tree has a nice set.

Filter attachment using a Step-Up Adapter Ring 30mm Lens to 37mm Filter Size from Amazon... grind off the 30 mm threads and epoxy to the camera. With this you can use any filter.

**https://kolarivision.com/product/kolari-infrared-full-spectrum-standard-ir-5-filter-kit
First class set at $129.

Remember, that while these cameras are not 20mp resolution, we have magic AI up scale programs to make them hi resolution clean of noise.

*** "Converting a Compact Digital Camera to Shoot Infrared Only - 1. removing the infrared filter"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frtQxryDTo8

Photo uses a color swap free plugin or you can with anguish do it in PS. Single click plugin is fast, easy.
http://www.flamingpear.com/older.html

I too am rowing the same canoe but opposite your end. I am thinking of converting a 6D or such and concerned if it breaks down what are my options. I would like to use a 6D that has had a good life and was treated well. After I convert it to infrared I want to know if the converters can repair a Canon. I plan to work it quite often. If it doesn’t work as well will the original converters repair it?

This is a tricky point because my only experience with infrared was marginal and back in the film days.

I believe we should open this thread up for all in favor or against IR conversion

I was getting ready to send a US model Nikon D5600 long out for a full spectrum IR conversion. The possibility of the camera needing repairs down the line occured to me so I sent Nikon an e-mail asking what their policy is on repairing conveerted cameras. Their prompt, as usual, answer was that they did not perform repairs on a camera that had been converted. Now I have to mull over whether to go ahead with the conversion knowing any camera failure would mean I have blown the $6-800 dollarvalue of the camera and conversion , or continue with the slow filter in front method. I've had no problems withe camera and one thought is to first send it to Nikon for a checkup and repair before having the conversion but that could add an appreciable amount to the investment. I am beginning to believe that the risk of losing the investment due to camera failure is simply the risk I have to take to get into the game, a risk that anyone converting to IR has to accept.

First of all, listen to those that recommend converting a mirrorless. With a DSLR they need to calibrate focus with whatever lens you use. With mirrorless it focuses on the sensor and no calibration is needed and you can use different lenses. I bought a used Panasonic GH1 and had it converted and I can use any of my M4/3 lenses.
Second, I’m not sure you understand what the conversion entails. If you do a full spectrum conversion they remove the IR filter from the sensor and replace it with clear glass. You still need the front filter to get the IR effect you want and you’re still looking at long exposures. Now it will be much more effective than just putting filters on a non-converted camera since the sensor IR filter is blocking much of the IR light you want. I’ll also add that Lifepixel did my conversion. They were great. One of the real benefits is that they include a half-hour zoom session to answer any questions and walk you through the initial processing. One of the most important things I learned is to use the manufacturers software to set the white balance before processing in LR/PS.