Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sony A77?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 3, 2022 18:11:56   #
daninr8 Loc: Western Slope of Colorado
 
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A77?
I'm trying to find out if I should give up my A77V, or keep using it and try to get some better glass.
I have the Sigma 18-250 that stays on my camera almost full time, and really don't want to have to change my lenses.
I know that a few prime lenses or even the Ziess lenses are better glass for my camera, but should I change to a full frame Sony or just stick with my A77 and my Sigma glass?
If I did change cameras, I want the 7M2K with a 28-70 kit lens?
I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots. So is it better to use a superzoom like my 18-250, or split it into 2 or 3 different lenses?

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 18:24:09   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
daninr8 wrote:
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A77?
I'm trying to find out if I should give up my A77V, or keep using it and try to get some better glass.
I have the Sigma 18-250 that stays on my camera almost full time, and really don't want to have to change my lenses.
I know that a few prime lenses or even the Ziess lenses are better glass for my camera, but should I change to a full frame Sony or just stick with my A77 and my Sigma glass?
If I did change cameras, I want the 7M2K with a 28-70 kit lens?
I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots. So is it better to use a superzoom like my 18-250, or split it into 2 or 3 different lenses?
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A7... (show quote)


Stick with what you have.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 19:53:29   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
daninr8 wrote:
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A77?
I'm trying to find out if I should give up my A77V, or keep using it and try to get some better glass.
I have the Sigma 18-250 that stays on my camera almost full time, and really don't want to have to change my lenses.
I know that a few prime lenses or even the Ziess lenses are better glass for my camera, but should I change to a full frame Sony or just stick with my A77 and my Sigma glass?
If I did change cameras, I want the 7M2K with a 28-70 kit lens?
I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots. So is it better to use a superzoom like my 18-250, or split it into 2 or 3 different lenses?
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A7... (show quote)


The A77 is very dated and so is your lens. I had the A77II and got rid of it several years ago because of the IQ ....I now have the A99 which is also very dated. I also have the RX10m4 - and the best I can advise you is get the RX10 and forget ALL about any lenses ! You are DONE ! .......yes I know , how would it LOOK to have a "point & shoot" - but your images will redeem you ! It is that GOOD.

The best crop lens for the A-mount is the Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.
.

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2022 07:30:38   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
The A77 is compatible with classic Minolta and early Sony glass. That compatibility is a strong reason to keep the A77. The classic glass is excellent and the price is low because millions were made from 1985 on. I have an A65 and it meets my needs ...

daninr8 said: "I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots." Daninr8 to do this, you will need to paint your lenses white so people will automatically think ... Canon... Canon is the sports and photojournalism badge of professionalism.
https://global.canon/en/quality/story/vol02.html

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 08:21:00   #
Canisdirus
 
If you are serious about charging...upgrade.
The A77 is a bit of a wildlife based design as was the A77II...I still have both...gathering ..well ... gathering something (they are in a dry box).

You'll want small versatile and ability to transfer on the fly.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:13:31   #
classic320
 
I have been using my A77 for about 5-6 years and have no plans to upgrade, though i may add an rx10 for travel. It appears that the Minolta legacy will not be continued with an other Sony model, but I feel I have more than enough quality to meet my needs: enough lenses (including some very high quality Minolta APOs) to take any picture challenge. Improvement for me will be in composition, exposure control, technique in general.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:22:18   #
Ollieboy
 
I use a Sony A77II and it takes beautiful pictures. No logical reason to replace it. (Except for GAS)

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2022 10:06:05   #
Xanadu Loc: Clay County FL
 
Opinion:
Imagemeister has made a very good suggestion. You will suffer the slings and arrows of the cognoscenti but you will capture some great shots and your lens inventory will be the loser.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 10:28:56   #
markwilliam1
 
daninr8 wrote:
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A77?
I'm trying to find out if I should give up my A77V, or keep using it and try to get some better glass.
I have the Sigma 18-250 that stays on my camera almost full time, and really don't want to have to change my lenses.
I know that a few prime lenses or even the Ziess lenses are better glass for my camera, but should I change to a full frame Sony or just stick with my A77 and my Sigma glass?
If I did change cameras, I want the 7M2K with a 28-70 kit lens?
I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots. So is it better to use a superzoom like my 18-250, or split it into 2 or 3 different lenses?
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A7... (show quote)

Yes! I have the a77ii and use the Legacy Minolta glass. You can buy Minolta AF lenses made in 1985 off of eBay for a song. The Minolta AF 100mm f2.8 Macro lens from 1985 is regarded as one of the world’s best Macro lenses ever made. The 1985 70-210 f4 “Beer Can” lens is also Awesome. And a few others from that year. I mention 1985 because that was the only year they manufactured their Legacy lenses! All metal construction. So Keep your a77 and try eBay for the lenses. Way better glass than anything Sigma ever made.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 11:01:49   #
pdsdville Loc: Midlothian, Tx
 
I have an A77v and an A77ii and see no reason to replace them as long as they take the great photos they always have. Why "upgrade" just to be keeping up with the Joneses?

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 11:09:27   #
bnsf
 
I also have a a99ii along with a RX10M4. I still shot with the a99ii and love it very much. I tried the new camera for a possible upgrade, but I will stick with my two cameras. Sony still has repair parts for the a77/77ii and the a99/99ii cameras. Until Sony does not have parts for the cameras, I am planning on keeping mine. I cannot tell the difference between the A7 and the a99ii in photo quality.

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2022 11:30:06   #
radiomantom Loc: Plymouth Indiana
 
bnsf wrote:
I also have a a99ii along with a RX10M4. I still shot with the a99ii and love it very much. I tried the new camera for a possible upgrade, but I will stick with my two cameras. Sony still has repair parts for the a77/77ii and the a99/99ii cameras. Until Sony does not have parts for the cameras, I am planning on keeping mine. I cannot tell the difference between the A7 and the a99ii in photo quality.


I have a A77v and a A700 and am still using both. The A77 is coupled with a Tamron 17-50 f2.8 and is used extensively by me. I have a 70-300 Tamron on the A700 I am very happy with the superb images I get with them. I have been toying with purchasing the Sony RX10 IV.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 12:54:30   #
Carl1024 Loc: Kaneohe, HI 96744
 
daninr8 wrote:
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A77?
I'm trying to find out if I should give up my A77V, or keep using it and try to get some better glass.
I have the Sigma 18-250 that stays on my camera almost full time, and really don't want to have to change my lenses.
I know that a few prime lenses or even the Ziess lenses are better glass for my camera, but should I change to a full frame Sony or just stick with my A77 and my Sigma glass?
If I did change cameras, I want the 7M2K with a 28-70 kit lens?
I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots. So is it better to use a superzoom like my 18-250, or split it into 2 or 3 different lenses?
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A7... (show quote)


I have an A77 that performs well w/n issures. Colors are breath taking?

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 13:44:40   #
spaceytracey Loc: East Glacier Park, MT
 
I have the A77 & the A65. I'm very happy w/both & suggest you keep what you have. Get the Zeiss lenses too.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 14:15:03   #
bonjac Loc: Santa Ynez, CA 93460
 
daninr8 wrote:
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A77?
I'm trying to find out if I should give up my A77V, or keep using it and try to get some better glass.
I have the Sigma 18-250 that stays on my camera almost full time, and really don't want to have to change my lenses.
I know that a few prime lenses or even the Ziess lenses are better glass for my camera, but should I change to a full frame Sony or just stick with my A77 and my Sigma glass?
If I did change cameras, I want the 7M2K with a 28-70 kit lens?
I plan on trying to get into photojournalism or at least trying to get shots of local events and trying to get some money from those shots. So is it better to use a superzoom like my 18-250, or split it into 2 or 3 different lenses?
Is anyone still actively shooting with the Sony A7... (show quote)


Here's something that may be of use. I love the old Minolta lenses and someone suggested that while their design is old and not as "good" as modern lenses, adding a circular polarizer can make a big difference. I did that and there was a difference. If I may, I suggest getting the Minolta 28-135 lens with the polarizer -- they are quite cheap and on your camera would give you a 42-210 (35mm) equivalent view. If you an (35mm equivalent) 35 or 28mm lens -- in my opinion.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.