Camera Shake
Jul 1, 2022 21:53:36 #
Jul 1, 2022 22:46:36 #
Jul 1, 2022 22:55:22 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Really? We need to know how to physically handle our cameras???
Camera manufacturers apparently think so. That is why they have developed image stabilization----for all of us
non-elitists who are always looking for ways to improve.
Jul 1, 2022 23:23:39 #
fantom wrote:
Camera manufacturers apparently think so. That is why they have developed image stabilization----for all of us
non-elitists who are always looking for ways to improve.
non-elitists who are always looking for ways to improve.
Buy a tripod. Better yet, pay someone to take the picture for you… Oh, wait, you already do!!! You let manufacturers dictate what needs to be done for a 'sure shot'.
Now, you really think that being confounded by a thread over how to keep a camera stable is being an elitist?
By the way, I feel you. Coming out of the closet (attic) to post in the main channel must be a traumatic experience.
Jul 1, 2022 23:46:18 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Buy a tripod. Better yet, pay someone to take the picture for you… Oh, wait, you already do!!! You let manufacturers dictate what needs to be done for a 'sure shot'.
Now, you really think that being confounded by a thread over how to keep a camera stable is being an elitist?
By the way, I feel you. Coming out of the closet (attic) to post in the main channel must be a traumatic experience.
Now, you really think that being confounded by a thread over how to keep a camera stable is being an elitist?
By the way, I feel you. Coming out of the closet (attic) to post in the main channel must be a traumatic experience.
Sorry, I should have said pompous elitist.
Jul 2, 2022 00:02:15 #
I welcome any improvements to preventing camera shake. I have a slight tremor in my hands and lots of my shots aren't nearly as sharp as they could be.
Jul 2, 2022 00:30:17 #
fantom wrote:
Sorry, I should have said pompous elitist.
Thank you. You are finally getting it.
Jul 2, 2022 01:19:14 #
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
Dikdik wrote:
A reasonable article but only covers full frame and APS-C. It doesn't cover the 5.5 or more available stops IS or where the camera movement, along with the IS system, is used to produce the 50mp / 80mp RAW images from the 20mp sensors. But it is good for as far as it went.
Jul 2, 2022 07:23:26 #
He kept saying "higher shutter speed" when he should have been saying "longer exposure time" or "slower shutter speed" 
.
.Jul 2, 2022 07:28:11 #
fantom wrote:
Camera manufacturers apparently think so. That is why they have developed image stabilization----for all of us
non-elitists who are always looking for ways to improve.
non-elitists who are always looking for ways to improve.
Some are elitists, some have just forgotten what it was like to be at the beginning of their learning curve. For a lot of beginners it won't be obvious that even imperceptible camera movements can spoil shots. Shooting techniques for hand-held shots are worth having a look at, even if you do have IBIS and OIS.
Jul 2, 2022 08:11:17 #
wdross wrote:
A reasonable article but only covers full frame and APS-C. It doesn't cover the 5.5 or more available stops IS or where the camera movement, along with the IS system, is used to produce the 50mp / 80mp RAW images from the 20mp sensors. But it is good for as far as it went.
I thought this was a good refresher article for some of us seniors who might be forgetful of some of the basics.... That being said I would like to see an in-depth article on just when IBIS and/or ILIS should be turned off and try and explain just exactly what the camera is detecting and what it is doing to alleviate the problem; and WHY leaving Stabilization on might be counterproductive to creating a stabilized image. Actually, I have discovered quite by accident that much higher ISO on my Olympus really do not degrade the image that much... I mistakenly shot 1600 for an entire day and never realized until looking at the data... SO, I am MORE confident of higher ISO in the future. All in all though we should not get sloppy with techniques just because electronics can compensate... Just my humble 2 cents ! Bob
Jul 2, 2022 09:37:47 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Really? We need to know how to physically handle our cameras???
Some do, yes.
Jul 2, 2022 12:35:04 #
R.G. wrote:
Some are elitists, some have just forgotten what it was like to be at the beginning of their learning curve. For a lot of beginners it won't be obvious that even imperceptible camera movements can spoil shots. Shooting techniques for hand-held shots are worth having a look at, even if you do have IBIS and OIS.
Jul 2, 2022 12:36:16 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.