Last week, I posted about a temporary sale on Amazon: 8TB WD Red (NAS) drive for $135. I ordered two so I could upgrade my NAS. Yesterday, I saw a new video on YouTube explaining the class action suit about WD Red. This seems to go back a couple of years. If I had known about it, I could have collected $4 - $7, like those other lucky people.
It seems that the "problem" was not much of a problem, so I'm still glad that I bought these drives.
Last week, I posted about a temporary sale on Amazon: 8TB WD Red (NAS) drive for $135. I ordered two so I could upgrade my NAS. Yesterday, I saw a new video on YouTube explaining the class action suit about WD Red. This seems to go back a couple of years. If I had known about it, I could have collected $4 - $7, like those other lucky people.
It seems that the "problem" was not much of a problem, so I'm still glad that I bought these drives.
Last week, I posted about a temporary sale on Amaz... (show quote)
For the most part, most really aren't a problem. Someone gets a bee in their bonnet and people jump on the band wagon, for their $4-$10. Meanwhile, the lawyers really make out.
For the most part, most really aren't a problem. Someone gets a bee in their bonnet and people jump on the band wagon, for their $4-$10. Meanwhile, the lawyers really make out.
My two 3TB WD Red have been working fine since 2014.
My two 3TB WD Red have been working fine since 2014.
My "under stated rating HP" mower worked great until I moved and sold it.
The Red wasn't about reliability, it was about "shingled" recording technology, where data overlaps other data. More data can be stored on a given surface area with shingled recording. How susceptible to data errors? Dunno. I suppose it depends on the extent of the overlap.
For the most part, most really aren't a problem. Someone gets a bee in their bonnet and people jump on the band wagon, for their $4-$10. Meanwhile, the lawyers really make out.