I'm kinda' sorta' learning to produce reasonable HDR at 4:30 in the evening. The HDR is composed of three different exposures and yields a rich result. This does not work for all photos.
HDR is a great tool. You know you have done it well when you cannot tell you have used an HDR technique. So many people "overcook" the image and it no longer looks natural. Many newer cameras offer in-camera HDR, which can work pretty well but using a wider spread of images with the camera on a tripod allows better HDR options. The HDR setting on the newer iPhones actually yields pretty good images.
HDR has early roots: " Ansel Adams himself was a master of HDR photography. ... his famous Zone System was designed to be able to photograph a scene with a lot of contrast and through shooting and film processing techniques β the photographer could manipulate the tones to be able to fit into one printable image." https://www.digitalphotomentor.com/to-hdr-or-not-when-and-if-you-should-use-hdr/
eli lucas, you said, " This does not work for all photos." Correct, same article says do not use for: Low Contrast photos or Silhouettes. Do not use HDR to βget ridβ of all the shadows in their image. Like shadows are a bad thing β they arenβt!" For more info refer to the same article.
I really have no idea what I'm doing; however, it is fun. It makes sense, in certain situations, the more information you can "load," into the photo the "richer" the result.
I really have no idea what I'm doing; however, it is fun. It makes sense, in certain situations, the more information you can "load," into the photo the "richer" the result.
Exceptional shooting I wish I didn't know what I was doing either πππππ
HDR is a great tool. You know you have done it well when you cannot tell you have used an HDR technique. So many people "overcook" the image and it no longer looks natural. Many newer cameras offer in-camera HDR, which can work pretty well but using a wider spread of images with the camera on a tripod allows better HDR options. The HDR setting on the newer iPhones actually yields pretty good images.
+100
It's always best, to me, when you can't tell you've used HDR. Same with a lot of other techniques. For instance I use vignettes frequently to emphasize my subject but my personal rule is, I don't want the viewer to know I've used it. I want it to be so subtle that it gently emphasizes the subject but you don't notice it unless you're looking for it. Same with HDR. It's a great technique for bringing out things in the shadows and suppressing the blown out highlights but I don't like it to be obvious.
Now, if you look at some of the beautiful examples on teh Photomatix website there are creative and visually impactful ways of using it. But most amatuers overdo it and you get the garish overcooked look. YOu've done a tasteful job of creating a well balanced image. My only comment would be to crop close to the statue. I can see you wanted to bring out the Spanish moss but I don't think the big tree adds anything. In fact it takes away from the nice lighting on teh statue.
Come on down! Here is an open invitation: Visit New Orleans and I promise to show you. Here are sum' mo':
Sometimes the HDR gets nuts as in the archer's gold and the cypress trees' greens. Any Ideas?
The specific shades of blue and gold used in the sculpture (the piece is supposed to represent nuclear war) are precise. I'm amazed at the transition from three photos that are quite dark to something like the above piece reminiscent of stag's horns. The biggest problem I experience using Luminance HDR: Sometimes the saturation of the resultant photo is too rich.