Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Where have all the dslrs gone? —Part 2
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Sep 2, 2021 08:50:47   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Mac wrote:
There is no doubt that cell phones can produce beautiful pictures. Can cell phone cameras shoot in Manual Exposure? Can cell phone cameras shoot in Manual Focus? Can cell phone cameras accept quality Polarizing filters? Can cell phone cameras accept quality ND filters? If not creativity is limited with cell phone cameras.


Answers to your questions in the order in which they were posted:

yes
yes
sorta - depends on your definition of quality, but most are pretty decent and don't diminish image quality much if at all
sorta - depends on your definition of quality, but most are pretty decent and don't diminish image quality much if at all

https://www.androidauthority.com/best-camera-apps-for-android-188148/
https://medium.com/@Mike_James/how-to-use-a-polarizing-filter-in-your-iphone-android-smartphone-photography-9f46d861b71e
https://photoswithphones.com/smartphone-camera-lens-filters-guide/

So no limit on creativity.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 09:00:28   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Delderby wrote:
I decided, more than a decade ago, that I wanted a viewfinder on my camera, which cells do not have. I haven't changed my mind. With the sun behind them cells are next to useless. With the sun in front of them cells are still next to useless. I laugh when I see dozens of cells being waved at near arms length as their owners try to snap events and processions. Cells are best on a dull day. A dull day means a dull photo. Cells have created a craze for selfies - at least this has reduced the defacing of property etc with the message "Tom? was here". But the mentality remains the same. Yes - cells are good for instantly sending pics? round the world. But that is about all they are good for. Now that cameras have wi-fi that advantage is fast disappearing.
I decided, more than a decade ago, that I wanted a... (show quote)


The impediments you describe that have informed your opinion don't seem to be a problem with the images shown here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/flickr/galleries/72157644100931123/

And Smartphone Photojournalism is a thing, and has been for quite a while:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/smartphone-photojournalism-michael-christopher-brown

https://www.kobratech.com/blogs/opinion/benjamin-lowy-the-photographer-documenting-war-with-a-cell-phone

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/photo/sandy-book-look-superstorm-through-iphone-photos-flna6c10868055

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 09:05:26   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
My cell phone has many adjustments like exposure, ISO up to 3200, manual or auto focus, but I still mostly use it as a phone or to stream videos or to post on UHH. It can take pretty good pics if I really want to, but my dslr still is my go to camera. This message was brought to you by my cell phone and not my dslr.

Reply
 
 
Sep 2, 2021 09:34:52   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
And so you want to start another 15 page adventure most likely covering the same things.
--Bob
genocolo wrote:
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and unexpectedly started a wide-ranging (15page), sometimes interesting, discussion. It was really meant only as an observation, nothing more.

That discussion confirms what we already knew, that most of us use BOTH mobile phones and dedicated, sophisticated cameras, generically described as “dslrs.” The choice often depends on a variety of factors, some of which are: “which is most readily available when the photo opportunity arises?”, “what is my target today?”, “is this a dedicated photo shoot?”, etc.

While obviously I am not arguing for or against the use of mobile phone cameras, I will say to those of you who dismiss a high quality mobile or cell phone camera as one only for “snapshots,” you should look at the results of the annual Mobile Photography Awards. Talk about “art” and “quality”! Also see Ken Rockwell’s extraordinarily positive review of the IPhone 12 Pro Max.

So, coming full circle and without trying to discover the EXIF data, which, IF ANY, of the four photos in my original post, do you believe were taken with an IPhone 12 Pro Max or with a Canon 80D with an EF 100-400mm f/4-5-6L IS II USM lens? For your convenience, I have attached the four photos again here.

After time for replies, I will post the answer if you are interested.
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and ... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 09:39:40   #
genocolo Loc: Vail and Gasparilla Island
 
rmalarz wrote:
And so you want to start another 15 page adventure most likely covering the same things.
--Bob


Not at all. Simple question was which was shot with an iphone? I just thought it would be fun to see the results. I assume that people are not answering the simple question because they can’t.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 09:40:02   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
genocolo wrote:
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and unexpectedly started a wide-ranging (15page), sometimes interesting, discussion. It was really meant only as an observation, nothing more.

That discussion confirms what we already knew, that most of us use BOTH mobile phones and dedicated, sophisticated cameras, generically described as “dslrs.” The choice often depends on a variety of factors, some of which are: “which is most readily available when the photo opportunity arises?”, “what is my target today?”, “is this a dedicated photo shoot?”, etc.

While obviously I am not arguing for or against the use of mobile phone cameras, I will say to those of you who dismiss a high quality mobile or cell phone camera as one only for “snapshots,” you should look at the results of the annual Mobile Photography Awards. Talk about “art” and “quality”! Also see Ken Rockwell’s extraordinarily positive review of the IPhone 12 Pro Max.

So, coming full circle and without trying to discover the EXIF data, which, IF ANY, of the four photos in my original post, do you believe were taken with an IPhone 12 Pro Max or with a Canon 80D with an EF 100-400mm f/4-5-6L IS II USM lens? For your convenience, I have attached the four photos again here.

After time for replies, I will post the answer if you are interested.
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and ... (show quote)


I shoot only wildlife, a cell phone cannot capture a moving object at 30 fps at 1/4000 sec. It just cannot do it, and until it can, I will be using my mirrorless and DSLR's. Thank you.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 09:47:48   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
When I admire the wonders of a sunset or the beauty of the moon, my soul expands knowing I captured it with a full-frame camera.

Reply
 
 
Sep 2, 2021 09:49:11   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 

--Bob

CHG_CANON wrote:
When I admire the wonders of a sunset or the beauty of the moon, my soul expands knowing I captured it with a full-frame camera.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 09:54:54   #
juan_uy Loc: Uruguay
 
genocolo wrote:
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and unexpectedly started a wide-ranging (15page), sometimes interesting, discussion. It was really meant only as an observation, nothing more.

That discussion confirms what we already knew, that most of us use BOTH mobile phones and dedicated, sophisticated cameras, generically described as “dslrs.” The choice often depends on a variety of factors, some of which are: “which is most readily available when the photo opportunity arises?”, “what is my target today?”, “is this a dedicated photo shoot?”, etc.

While obviously I am not arguing for or against the use of mobile phone cameras, I will say to those of you who dismiss a high quality mobile or cell phone camera as one only for “snapshots,” you should look at the results of the annual Mobile Photography Awards. Talk about “art” and “quality”! Also see Ken Rockwell’s extraordinarily positive review of the IPhone 12 Pro Max.

So, coming full circle and without trying to discover the EXIF data, which, IF ANY, of the four photos in my original post, do you believe were taken with an IPhone 12 Pro Max or with a Canon 80D with an EF 100-400mm f/4-5-6L IS II USM lens? For your convenience, I have attached the four photos again here.

After time for replies, I will post the answer if you are interested.
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and ... (show quote)


Just to stay on topic, I say:
iPhone
Canon
Canon
iPhone

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 10:01:45   #
ELNikkor
 
Besides talking and texting, on rare occasions, I check my e-mail with my cell phone, and maybe take 2 photos per month, if that. My D750 24-120 f4 takes 95% of my photos.
My wife and son take excellent photos and videos with their Pixel 4a phones, but also make use of apps which are Greek to me, but necessary for their life-styles. We're all having happy, fulfilling lives, and wish the same for others, regardless of their specific preferences.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 10:07:37   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
rook2c4 wrote:
Yes, cell phones can shoot in manual exposure and shoot in manual focus as well with the use of apps. And I've used a polarizing filter with my phone, although I did need to rig up a small diameter filter to the phone such that the filter could be held in position. By the same method, ND filters could be used.

Essentially, creativity is limited with any camera. Buy a top of the line camera today, and in 15 years from now you will think how limited it is compared to the latest available cameras. The trick is to be creative within a camera's limitations and not worry too much about what else is out there or will eventually be out there.
Yes, cell phones can shoot in manual exposure and ... (show quote)


Well then, I’m wrong. You can be creative with a cell phone camera.

Reply
 
 
Sep 2, 2021 10:13:20   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Gene51 wrote:
Answers to your questions in the order in which they were posted:

yes
yes
sorta - depends on your definition of quality, but most are pretty decent and don't diminish image quality much if at all
sorta - depends on your definition of quality, but most are pretty decent and don't diminish image quality much if at all

https://www.androidauthority.com/best-camera-apps-for-android-188148/
https://medium.com/@Mike_James/how-to-use-a-polarizing-filter-in-your-iphone-android-smartphone-photography-9f46d861b71e
https://photoswithphones.com/smartphone-camera-lens-filters-guide/

So no limit on creativity.
Answers to your questions in the order in which th... (show quote)


Thanks Gene

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 10:13:44   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
genocolo wrote:
My original post on August 29 unintentionally and unexpectedly started a wide-ranging (15page), sometimes interesting, discussion. It was really meant only as an observation, nothing more.


I know what you mean. When I'm in an area where lots of people are taking pictures, it's unusual to see many DSLRs. It's mostly cell phones and tablets.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 10:14:19   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 


Yes - some great pics here - but would they stand cropping/enlarging for framing? I appreciate that there are now software apps for enlarging, but I have no experience of them.

On a different observation, it amuses me that so many photographers have denigrated P&S cameras, but extol every virtue they can dream up for using a cell as a camera.

Reply
Sep 2, 2021 10:18:13   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Imagine yourself as a successful photographer. Are you holding a cell phone?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.