Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Is this rolling shutter?
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jul 19, 2021 17:28:17   #
Zooman 1
 
Was shooting with my recently acquired R5. Took almost 800 images and maybe 8 were only half there. Have read about rolling shutter problem. Was using electronic shutter.



Reply
Jul 19, 2021 18:43:00   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Not sure but, I have seen an example of the photos going on a slant/diagonal from bottom left to upper right once in some samples. Probably a panning sequence.

Reply
Jul 19, 2021 18:57:54   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
No not rolling shutter perhaps a buffer problem.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2021 19:17:26   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
The border dividing dark side from light side is too crisp to be caused rolling shutter.

Reply
Jul 19, 2021 19:38:35   #
User ID
 
Thaz not rolling shutter at all. Gentle soft edged shadowy banding would be rolling shutter, and ONLY with pulsed artificial light. No such effect at all in daylight.

Your result is similar to synchro-sun fill flash, in daylight, at the wrong shutter speed. Similar but its characteristics are not really a good match for that either.

The only other thing rolling shutter does is motion distortion, way different from your example.

You seem to have a definite hardware or file writing malfunction. Hopefully a very verrrrry rare fluke. Such odd things can happen to gear thaz in perfect operating condition. It’s not usually a precursor of an impending breakdown.

Reply
Jul 19, 2021 21:03:24   #
Zooman 1
 
Thanks to everyone who responded. I have not had this problem with the R6. Might be operator error.

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 06:00:16   #
Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis
 
Zooman 1 wrote:
Was shooting with my recently acquired R5. Took almost 800 images and maybe 8 were only half there. Have read about rolling shutter problem. Was using electronic shutter.


I'M betting its from too slow shutter speed when using flash

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2021 06:13:10   #
User ID
 
Manglesphoto wrote:
I'M betting its from too slow shutter speed when using flash

Just don’t bet too heavily. A nickel or dime, but wasting any folding money would be kinda tragic.

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 06:57:42   #
AlanW Loc: Upstate NY
 
Zooman 1 wrote:
Was shooting with my recently acquired R5. Took almost 800 images and maybe 8 were only half there. Have read about rolling shutter problem. Was using electronic shutter.


To my eyes the lower section looks to be missing most of the green channel. I think this would indicate a hardware issue rather than exposure/shutter issue. You should be able to investigate this more in your PP software.

Alan

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 07:02:52   #
Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis
 
User ID wrote:
Just don’t bet too heavily. A nickel or dime, but wasting any folding money would be kinda tragic.


I never do!!!

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 07:49:12   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Manglesphoto wrote:
I'M betting its from too slow shutter speed when using flash


If using a flash, perhaps the opposite? From the article, "You can clearly see that the flash synced at speeds up to 1/125, but at 1/250 there is the start of a black band along one edge and at 1/2000 the frame is completely black. With some lower cost remote flash triggers, you would even see the black band at 1/125, so you would need to set your shutter speed to 1/80 sec. or 1/60."
https://cornicello.com/itfigures/flash-shutter-speed

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2021 07:51:16   #
BebuLamar
 
I don't think it's the flash. The background is well lit and is affected the same.

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 07:58:08   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
BebuLamar wrote:
I don't think it's the flash. The background is well lit and is affected the same.


Yes, well, at least the information in the article is a good discussion for the use of flash and sync speed. I often use flash and high-speed shutter and tight lens to take photos of flowers to discard the sunlight from the photo. That is to say, if I did not use the flash with my f and speed the total photo would be significantly underexposed. With flash, the inverse square law underexposes things farther away from the flash

It is good that we in UHH have our Sherlock Homes hats on and debate the clues to solve mysterious events.

The rolling shutter effect is typical when taking a photo of a fast moving object. The front of the car is taken first and the rear is not in the same place because it has move in relation to the front when the camera eventually [short eventually] gets around to see the rear. One example is in video when taking a photo in which there is a propeller... tho, in reality, it is straight, in the video it appears that the blades are hooked.
http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2010/07/rolling-shutter.html

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 08:15:49   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
Zooman 1 wrote:
Was shooting with my recently acquired R5. Took almost 800 images and maybe 8 were only half there. Have read about rolling shutter problem. Was using electronic shutter.


No. Looks more like a sync problem.

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 09:13:10   #
BebuLamar
 
AlanW wrote:
To my eyes the lower section looks to be missing most of the green channel. I think this would indicate a hardware issue rather than exposure/shutter issue. You should be able to investigate this more in your PP software.

Alan


I think you're on to something there. It does look like the bottom half just didn't have the green channel.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.