Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
Possibly some helpful info for SOOC photographers...
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Jul 12, 2021 18:18:23   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
selmslie wrote:
You are the one that is confused and wrong.



Sure looks like Auto WB to me.


In photography we have this option to use what we call raw files. I use raw files. And the WB setting on the camera has no affect on them. Now in that photo I only saved a raw file and it's that raw file that I processed. And when I processed it I did not use auto WB. You were directly asking about the color in the photo I presented and you suggested the color was because I may have used auto WB. I did not use auto WB when I processed that raw file. The EXIF data that's following the raw file around has the settings that the camera used to make a JPEG. I did not show that JPEG and those settings do not apply to what I did with the raw file. You think you can understand that or is that too much for you all at once.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 18:27:02   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
In photography we have this option to use what we call raw files. I use raw files. And the WB setting on the camera has no affect on them. Now in that photo I only saved a raw file and it's that raw file that I processed. And when I processed it I did not use auto WB. ....

You are not showing us the embedded JPEG (you could extract it) and it's certainly not the JPEG SOOC.

Your raw conversion program applied some default editing to the raw image to produce the default JPEG.

You don't need to use insults in an adult discussion - unless you just can't control yourself.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 18:33:18   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
selmslie wrote:
You are not showing us the embedded JPEG (you could extract it) and it's certainly not the JPEG SOOC.

Your raw conversion program applied some default editing to the raw image to produce the default JPEG.


I'm not showing the embedded JPEG nor the JPEG SOOC. I never said I was. That image is a JPEG saved from a processed raw file. I processed the raw file in Capture One to create the image I wanted. And in that processing I set a custom WB. Where are you confused here?

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2021 19:02:27   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
I'm not showing the embedded JPEG nor the JPEG SOOC. I never said I was. That image is a JPEG saved from a processed raw file. ...

Earlier you wrote:
Ysarex wrote:
I shot the photo below with my Nikon. The first image is the SOOC JPEG (no attempt to set picture controls).

The second photo is the photo I took which I processed from the raw file. ...

I guess my memory is better than yours.

But, "If you tell the truth you don't have to have a good memory."

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 19:13:38   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
Ysarex wrote:
I'm not showing the embedded JPEG nor the JPEG SOOC. I never said I was. That image is a JPEG saved from a processed raw file. ...

selmslie wrote:
Earlier you wrote: I shot the photo below with my Nikon. The first image is the SOOC JPEG (no attempt to set picture controls).

The second photo is the photo I took which I processed from the raw file. ...

And it's that second photo we're talking about now, NOT the one from my Nikon.
selmslie wrote:
I guess my memory is better than yours.

You are very confused. You are confusing what was said about the two photos. You just showed me the EXIF data from the photo taken with the Samsung camera -- I never claimed to be showing a camera JPEG from that camera.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 19:36:25   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
And it's that second photo we're talking about now, NOT the one from my Nikon.

No, that's from your post on page 2.
Ysarex wrote:
You are very confused. You are confusing what was said about the two photos. You just showed me the EXIF data from the photo taken with the Samsung camera -- I never claimed to be showing a camera JPEG from that camera.

I never said you did. For that one you claimed it was not Auto ISO, but is it.

You are thoroughly confused.

I have better things to do than to continue this discussion. You are wasting my time and everyone else's.

I am un-watching. Goodbye.

Reply
Jul 12, 2021 21:55:13   #
controversy Loc: Wuhan, China
 
selmslie wrote:
I never said you did. For that one you claimed it was not Auto ISO, but is it.

You are thoroughly confused.

I have better things to do than to continue this discussion. You are wasting my time and everyone else's.

I am un-watching. Goodbye.


Ah, such a sweet surrender message.

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2021 22:16:57   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
Ysarex wrote:
You are very confused. You are confusing what was said about the two photos. You just showed me the EXIF data from the photo taken with the Samsung camera -- I never claimed to be showing a camera JPEG from that camera.

selmslie wrote:
I never said you did.

Yeah you did. You confused the two photos. Right here: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-703922-5.html#12390287 where you say, "I am referring to the image you claimed was a JPEG SOOC (EXIF shows custom WB)..." but the image you were referring to was in fact the discarded print image and you were confused.

And then again when I noted concerning the discarded print image that I was not showing the embedded JPEG or SOOC JPEG and had not claimed I was you responded: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-703922-6.html#12390457
"Earlier you wrote: I shot the photo below with my Nikon. The first image is the SOOC JPEG (no attempt to set picture controls)."

So yes you did. You were confused. And now:
selmslie wrote:
For that one you claimed it was not Auto ISO, but is it.

Auto ISO? Are you OK? Have you had a stroke or something?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.