Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Landscape Photography
Glen Esk.
Jun 12, 2021 05:58:37   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
I'm not sure what category this style of landscape shot falls into. It's not wide enough to be considered scenic but it's not zoomed in enough to be considered intimate landscape or even a "study" type of picture. If it doesn't have a name already, my suggestion would be "terrain photography".
.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Jun 13, 2021 16:32:44   #
Wanderer2 Loc: Colorado Rocky Mountains
 
"Terrain photography" sounds good to me. Thanks for posting these different look images.

Reply
Jun 14, 2021 02:14:04   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Wanderer2 wrote:
"Terrain photography" sounds good to me. Thanks for posting these different look images.


You're welcome Wanderer2. Thanks for your comments, and glad you enjoyed.

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2021 06:58:51   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
I'd term them "rocky outcroppings." I take a lot of pictures of these interesting land formations. To me, they signify the geologic energy below the surface.
R.G. wrote:
I'm not sure what category this style of landscape shot falls into. It's not wide enough to be considered scenic but it's not zoomed in enough to be considered intimate landscape or even a "study" type of picture. If it doesn't have a name already, my suggestion would be "terrain photography".
.

Reply
Jun 14, 2021 07:17:44   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
anotherview wrote:
I'd term them "rocky outcroppings." I take a lot of pictures of these interesting land formations. To me, they signify the geologic energy below the surface.


They're definitely a subject in their own right. While rocky outcrops are a distinctive feature of this type of shot, I see it as being more about the wider environment as well. In that context the rocks, scree, trees etc are elements of the shots, where the wider view shows more of the surrounding terrain.

To my mind, individual features like outcrops can be worthy subjects of "intimate landscape" or "study" shots, but if you include more of the surroundings I feel that it deserves a different classification. I don't think it's important how things are categorised, but having different classifications can help us to think about what we're doing and to be clearer in our purposes. And it gives us the vocabulary to describe and discuss what we're trying to achieve.

Reply
Jun 22, 2021 17:39:38   #
Uuglypher Loc: South Dakota (East River)
 
R.G. wrote:
I'm not sure what category this style of landscape shot falls into. It's not wide enough to be considered scenic but it's not zoomed in enough to be considered intimate landscape or even a "study" type of picture. If it doesn't have a name already, my suggestion would be "terrain photography".
.


Hi, Coz,
Not being familiar with any ordained “splitter’s” sub classification of “landscapes”, your Glen Esk image’s strike me as fitting nicely with my personally envisioned sub-set emphasizing local “topographic geology”, but I must admit that now “Terrain images” deserves serious consideration. The sites you imaged struck me in an intimately familiar way, having back-packed in that region inland - and up hill (definitely uphill) from Stonehaven on the coast toward Brechin (?) over forty years ago. Awesome scenery, wonderfully rugged with projecting granitic bedrock everywhere.

Thanks…much… for posting these!
yr Coz’ in the Colonies

Reply
Jun 23, 2021 11:24:58   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Uuglypher wrote:
Hi, Coz,
Not being familiar with any ordained “splitter’s” sub classification of “landscapes”, your Glen Esk image’s strike me as fitting nicely with my personally envisioned sub-set emphasizing local “topographic geology”, but I must admit that now “Terrain images” deserves serious consideration. The sites you imaged struck me in an intimately familiar way, having back-packed in that region inland - and up hill (definitely uphill) from Stonehaven on the coast toward Brechin (?) over forty years ago. Awesome scenery, wonderfully rugged with projecting granitic bedrock everywhere.

Thanks…much… for posting these!
yr Coz’ in the Colonies
Hi, Coz, br Not being familiar with any ordained “... (show quote)


Hi Coz in the Territories. You nailed the location. It's between Laurencekirk and Brechin. It's what could be considered the foothills of the Grampians. I doubt it's changed much since you were there. Even the size of the trees is probably similar. The topsoil's too sparse to support anything larger. Thanks for commenting and glad you enjoyed.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Landscape Photography
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.