Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikkor 16-35 Full Frame
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jun 8, 2021 22:25:02   #
Temuna
 
Has anyone had experience using this lens (with adapter) on the Z5? Any thoughts?

Thanks for any comments.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 22:38:13   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
No. But, I've used it on both my D800e and D850. I rather like it. I've also learned that one has to be careful about what is included in the frame when photographing with it.
--Bob
Temuna wrote:
Has anyone had experience using this lens (with adapter) on the Z5? Any thoughts?

Thanks for any comments.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 23:33:14   #
Temuna
 
Too good to let this pass by. What do you mean about what is included?

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2021 23:35:33   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
One just has to be careful about what is in the margins of the scene they are photographing. The 16mm will cover quite a lot of area.
--Bob
Temuna wrote:
Too good to let this pass by. What do you mean about what is included?

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 23:48:17   #
Temuna
 
Understood. I was hoping for a more dramatic and exciting answer.

Thanks.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 01:07:21   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Temuna wrote:
Has anyone had experience using this lens (with adapter) on the Z5? Any thoughts?

Thanks for any comments.


Nikkor lenses work beautifully on a Z with the F2Z adapter.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 07:26:22   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Temuna wrote:
Has anyone had experience using this lens (with adapter) on the Z5? Any thoughts?

Thanks for any comments.


The Nikon 16-35 f4 is simply one of the best zoom lenses at these focal lengths. Most Nikon AF G lenses will work just fine off the Z5 (with the adapter) in fact, most Nikon shooters think the Nikon G lenses are better off the Z's.
This is my GO TO Landscape lens. I love to shoot foreground/background shots with this lens. At 16 mm it is as sharp as a tack, but, of course, it is tack sharp from 16-35, that is why I like it so much.
The image below (taken with the Nikon 16-35) is of one of the many waterfalls I shot while in Vermont. The town wanted to show that the original factory that ran on water power from the adjoining water falls (seen in the back ground) was made from the rocks in the river. Mission accomplished with the Nikon 16-35. My only complaint is that I wish Nikon had made this lens more compact.
I pair this lens with the Nikon 24-120 for landscapes because they both take 77 mm filters.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.



Reply
 
 
Jun 9, 2021 07:59:47   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
I have never used the 16-35mm on a Z5 with an adapter; but on an 800E it is a fine, sharp lens.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 08:09:22   #
Temuna
 
Great shot. Thank you.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 08:25:27   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
I used the 16-35 w/my Z6 when new. As good as with my D810. I cannot imagine any degradation with the Z5. It sounds like you have the Z5, but not the 16-35. I sold mine and purchased the Z 14-30; because it is lighter and an extraordinary lens. You can't go wrong with the 16-35.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 12:25:40   #
shutterbob Loc: Tucson
 
I have a z5 and used to have a 16-35 Nikon f4 that worked fine together. There were no problems of any kind.....It worked as well on the z5 as on my D750. The only complaint was that with the FTZ the combination became front heavy and rather bulky. I have since then sold the 16-35 and purchased a Nikon 14-30 f4. It produces photos that are every bit as good as the 16-35, it takes filters on the front just like the 16-35, but since it is designed as a lens for mirrorless it is about half the size and weight of the 16-35/FTZ combo. If you have $1,000 or so (depending on when Nikon runs their promos) it is worth the swap. Plus you should be able to get a pretty good down payment by selling the 16-35. I have no regrets in doing so.

Reply
 
 
Jun 9, 2021 12:33:25   #
Temuna
 
Helpful. Thanks.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 13:37:12   #
baron_silverton Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
Temuna wrote:
Has anyone had experience using this lens (with adapter) on the Z5? Any thoughts?

Thanks for any comments.


Not this exact lens but many other F Mount lenses from the same era, and have watched reviews of those that use this lens on the mirrorless system - it will work perfectly - even better than DSLR as there will now be enhanced VR as well as focusing points across the frame.

Any sacrifice in AF acquisition speed will be very small and on an ultra-wide essentially irrelevant - probably won't even be able to notice it if it exists at all.

Good luck!

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 22:24:33   #
RightOnPhotography Loc: Quebec,QC
 
Temuna wrote:
Has anyone had experience using this lens (with adapter) on the Z5? Any thoughts?

Thanks for any comments.


I used it on D750 and on Z6. It's a fine lens, but not spectacular. It's pretty heavy, too.

Reply
Jun 9, 2021 23:32:33   #
Temuna
 
Not rushing on this, but I might spend the extra money and go for the 14-30. Lighter and with good reviews and no need for adapter.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.