rmalarz wrote:
You are selecting a unique, specific situation on which to base your argument. Fine. Go right ahead. Now, if you really want to have a meaningful argument, why not argue with Blake.
But this is my point. I'm not trying to dismiss the differences between working with raw versus JPEG. But I am complaining about the way the video author went about it. He made a bunch of prior assumptions that on face value are wrong. Some people shoot JPEGs knowing full well that they will never see post processing -- that any post processing is not an option. They should shoot raw because it's better?
The only thing I'm asking for from the video is a more appropriate acknowledgement that SOOC JPEGs exist for darn good reasons and in those cases they're completely appropriate.