Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Critique Section
Infrared
Apr 1, 2021 20:19:41   #
peekaboo
 
I'm doing more infrared and like your reactions


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 2, 2021 06:57:38   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
What nanometer is your camera convert to? 520nm?

Reply
Apr 2, 2021 08:41:40   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
Very nicely done. I just acquired a Fuji X100S full spectrum conversion. Hoping to get out this week with it.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2021 11:12:30   #
peekaboo
 
It's been so long ago but I do recall one was converted to super blue.

Reply
Apr 2, 2021 11:13:39   #
peekaboo
 
Good luck. I even shot pics during the winter season.

Reply
Apr 2, 2021 11:25:56   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
The photos are lovely. My preference is 720nm for black and white infrared. The composition is lovely using brick ,water etc.

Reply
Apr 2, 2021 11:56:09   #
Cwilson341 Loc: Central Florida
 
Interesting results. I really like the color of the second one.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2021 12:10:54   #
peekaboo
 
Glad you all enjoyed my pics. Thanks loads.

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 21:07:52   #
peekaboo
 
You can convert these to B & W.

Reply
Apr 11, 2021 17:27:18   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
Outdoor Photographer has a nice article on Infrared photography in their current edition (april 10, 2021), some really nice images.

Reply
May 31, 2021 22:41:11   #
peekaboo
 
My cameras are converted to " Enhance Infrared 665nm " & the other converted to " Super Blue. " Lifepixel did the convergent

Reply
 
 
Jun 16, 2021 05:45:39   #
PaulG Loc: Western Australia
 
The first one contains an awful lot of overpowering foliage without a definitive subject in mind. I like the idea, and there is huge scope for this, but I'm just wondering what you objective was here? What result were you aiming for? Second one - slightly leaning profile (to left). And the tree overhang really intrudes on the subject, confusing the viewer as to what is the "actual" subject here - church (background) or trees (foreground). Anyway, nice post

Reply
Jun 16, 2021 11:04:08   #
peekaboo
 
PaulG wrote:
The first one contains an awful lot of overpowering foliage without a definitive subject in mind. I like the idea, and there is huge scope for this, but I'm just wondering what you objective was here? What result were you aiming for? Second one - slightly leaning profile (to left). And the tree overhang really intrudes on the subject, confusing the viewer as to what is the "actual" subject here - church (background) or trees (foreground). Anyway, nice post
The first one contains an awful lot of overpowerin... (show quote)


The trees could be viewed as window to frame the church. Every one has their version of windows and I guess my version is unusual. But thanks for your comment

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Critique Section
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.