Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Recommendation for a small travel camera
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jan 12, 2021 22:20:39   #
THRYLLOS
 
I use the Nikon Z 50 with the two kit lenses and I am very happy with the size of the camera and quality of the photos.

Reply
Jan 12, 2021 23:06:46   #
fstoprookie Loc: Central Valley of California
 
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight travel camera. I have a Fuji system: First, an XE2 and then an XT2. I was disappointed in the results from both Fuji’s, particularly with the kit lens. I have a full Nikon system but it is too heavy to carry around. I do have a Leica Type 109, which is great but the range is short (24-70 equivalent). I was thinking of the Sony A series cameras like the A6600. I still am mystified about the Fuji reviews. I have a 23 f2; 27 f2.8; 50 f2 and 55-300 with an XT2. Thoughts? Could be me but I have been taking pix for over fourth years.
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)


I have had a NIKON Z50 for about a year now - I love it with the kit lenses & I also am Nikon lens heavy, so I purchased the FTZ adapter. I mostly use the kit lenses with it but have used my f2.8 24-70mm FF lens and FTZ adapter for a HS basketball game and its performance and IQ were superb. However, using the adapter and FF lenses do defeat the weight advantage of the kit lenses. I recommend going to a camera store near you or rent one online and put it in your hands. That will pretty much answer your questions. The menu system will feel familiar and make you comfortable using it. PM me if you would like further information. Hope this helped

Reply
Jan 13, 2021 02:00:58   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Doc Barry wrote:
I have the RX100 VII and it is a great pocket camera. Soon Sony is expected to release the RX100 VIII that will have (it is thought anyway) a 10X rather than 8X, enhanced 20 MP sensor, improved processor, etc. I do note that it takes a little effort to learn the camera, but once you get it set up the way you like, it is very easy and nice to use. Strongly recommend Gary Friedman's book on this camera.


What my friend Doc Barry says. I have one, too. Wonderful camera.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2021 02:08:41   #
davidb1879
 
Re: Miami 39: (Wants small, light camera.) Many of the cameras discussed above seem to have excellent qualities, except for one problem. Their focal length is too short. I prefer the panasonic lumix FZ300. It has the 35mm equivalent of 24-600mm. IT has a constant 2.8 aperture throughout the entire lens. Its image quality is good. It has macro as well as raw. It's true that it will not fit in your pocket, But it only weighs a little over a pound. Just sling it over your shoulder or hold it by the camera case handle. Well, let us know when you finally decide. In the meanwhile, stay healthy. Davidb1879

Reply
Jan 13, 2021 06:59:40   #
UTEP65 Loc: Lake Royale, NC
 
I really enjoyed the in depth discussion on “recommendation for a small travel camera”. I was especially interested in the discussion and description of the Sony RX100 VI. I was curious about cost. I found what I consider the most reputable camera dealers and they all had the camera priced exactly the same...$1,198. I then found other dealers that had priced the same camera from $549-$799. Two of the dealers did describe the camera as an “import Model”. Any advice or thoughts?

Reply
Jan 13, 2021 07:20:55   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight travel camera. I have a Fuji system: First, an XE2 and then an XT2. I was disappointed in the results from both Fuji’s, particularly with the kit lens. I have a full Nikon system but it is too heavy to carry around. I do have a Leica Type 109, which is great but the range is short (24-70 equivalent). I was thinking of the Sony A series cameras like the A6600. I still am mystified about the Fuji reviews. I have a 23 f2; 27 f2.8; 50 f2 and 55-300 with an XT2. Thoughts? Could be me but I have been taking pix for over fourth years.
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)


Where do you travel?
What do you do when traveling (visit museums, snorkeling, hiking the Amazon forest....)?
What do you most like to photograph when traveling?
Do you travel alone or do you have a traveling companion?

Reply
Jan 13, 2021 07:40:03   #
PCB_smv
 
The Sony Cybershot mentioned. I love it, small and takes great shots. The menu at times can be confusing but easily learned. In the menu they have a place you can put all of your personal settings. The one I carry all the time.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2021 09:07:38   #
Bayou
 
UTEP65 wrote:
...Two of the dealers did describe the camera as an “import Model”. Any advice or thoughts?


These are so called "grey market" products. They were not imported into the US by authorized American dealers, but by distributors who "went around" the usual import channels. This is legal, but the catch is that you lose the US warranty. Instead, you may get a warranty direct from the dealer, or perhaps an International warranty that requires you deal direct with the manufacturer or perhaps a foreign distributor to get warranty service. Good luck with that!

Buying grey market is a gamble. Same exact product, but not well supported....maybe not supported at all.

Reply
Jan 13, 2021 16:15:35   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight travel camera. I have a Fuji system: First, an XE2 and then an XT2. I was disappointed in the results from both Fuji’s, particularly with the kit lens. I have a full Nikon system but it is too heavy to carry around. I do have a Leica Type 109, which is great but the range is short (24-70 equivalent). I was thinking of the Sony A series cameras like the A6600. I still am mystified about the Fuji reviews. I have a 23 f2; 27 f2.8; 50 f2 and 55-300 with an XT2. Thoughts? Could be me but I have been taking pix for over fourth years.
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)


Frankly, if I were you I'd work with the Fuji system to see what you can do to improve your results with it. Fuji makes great cameras and lenses, and they are reasonably compact, lighter weight than most DSLRs (you didn't specify, only mentioned "Nikon").

Forget the Sony... or buying any other camera for that matter. You already have three different brands of cameras.... adding a fourth would probably only make for more confusion switching back and forth between them.

I would suggest you upload some images here from the Fuji to get some feedback about how you might improve them. Tell us what you were trying to achieve and Be sure to check "store original" and provide a fairly large size image complete with EXIF intact, for the best feedback from other people here on UHH, hopefully some other Fuji and X-T2 users.

It is possible you'll never get "comfortable" with the Fuji, of course. But simply switching brands repeatedly doesn't usually make peoples' images better. In fact, I bet it most often makes them worse.

Reply
Jan 14, 2021 09:05:38   #
TommiRulz Loc: Corpus Christi, TX
 
I did not read all the posts so I'm sure I'm repeating .... But I love to buy cameras, so I have had SO MANY.. and I always go back to the Sony Rx 100 line for travel. I have dropped them, soaked them, used them super drunk - and always get good results. We also always bring a Olympus Tough TG for our water adventures, this camera also never disappoints. I also found Fuji to be a frustrating and unfriendly system, but they do have bad ass pq if you can get used to it. (I gave up and sold mine, but I wish I hadn't)

Reply
Jan 14, 2021 09:20:35   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
I own the TG-6. It performs well for a point-and-shoot.
wdross wrote:
The only other possible alternative would be the TG-6 if waterproof and drop resistant (7') are needed. With only an internal 25-100 lens (f2 at the wide angle) and I believe 12mp sensor, it will not offer the imaging of the Sony. But it can go in the water with you (50') and not likely to break if in any way it is dropped. Plus the macro/micro abilities for such a small "low" cost camera are almost unbelievable. Again, it will depend on your wants and needs.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2021 14:15:24   #
Billy Bob 2 Loc: Marengo IN
 
I been using a Canon Power Shot for years. A great pocket camera.

Reply
Jan 14, 2021 20:10:34   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight travel camera. I have a Fuji system: First, an XE2 and then an XT2. I was disappointed in the results from both Fuji’s, particularly with the kit lens. I have a full Nikon system but it is too heavy to carry around. I do have a Leica Type 109, which is great but the range is short (24-70 equivalent). I was thinking of the Sony A series cameras like the A6600. I still am mystified about the Fuji reviews. I have a 23 f2; 27 f2.8; 50 f2 and 55-300 with an XT2. Thoughts? Could be me but I have been taking pix for over fourth years.
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)


Take a look at the new Sony A7c. It is basically a full frame A7iii in an A6xxx format. Sony is producing some great lightweight, compact, primes and wide telephotos that would serve a traveler well. If you want something pocketable (jacket not pants) try one of the several versions of the Sony RX 100 compacts.

Reply
Jan 15, 2021 07:16:42   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight travel camera. I have a Fuji system: First, an XE2 and then an XT2. I was disappointed in the results from both Fuji’s, particularly with the kit lens. I have a full Nikon system but it is too heavy to carry around. I do have a Leica Type 109, which is great but the range is short (24-70 equivalent). I was thinking of the Sony A series cameras like the A6600. I still am mystified about the Fuji reviews. I have a 23 f2; 27 f2.8; 50 f2 and 55-300 with an XT2. Thoughts? Could be me but I have been taking pix for over fourth years.
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)


The smallest is the Sony RX100 M7. The Nikon Z50 is the smallest powerhouse I have experienced and the Canon M50 is no slouch. I have all three. I would opt for the Z50 if I had to choose.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.