Recommendation for a small travel camera
Jan 12, 2021 12:58:45 #
daldds wrote:
These were taken with a Sony RX100vi. The hawk was taken at full telephoto, and the golf scene that “normal.“. The camera is palm sized.
You did not put a budget suggestion.
The one big disadvantage I find with the camera is that you must use the viewfinder on bright days.
Hope this helps.
You did not put a budget suggestion.
The one big disadvantage I find with the camera is that you must use the viewfinder on bright days.
Hope this helps.
I personally lust after a Sony RX100 VII for travel, but that is just me.
https://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/rx100-vii.htm
Best wishes on your photo journey
Smile,
JimmyT Sends
Jan 12, 2021 13:20:29 #
tomad
Loc: North Carolina
The Sony A7C is a full frame camera about the same size as the A6600 you mentioned. If you add the 28-60mm retractable lens, it is the smallest package in its class; now the top rated full frame travel camera by many reviewers. Here's a full review...
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a7c-review
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a7c-review
Jan 12, 2021 13:35:48 #
Jan 12, 2021 13:49:44 #
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)
I have the RX100 VII and it is a great pocket camera. Soon Sony is expected to release the RX100 VIII that will have (it is thought anyway) a 10X rather than 8X, enhanced 20 MP sensor, improved processor, etc. I do note that it takes a little effort to learn the camera, but once you get it set up the way you like, it is very easy and nice to use. Strongly recommend Gary Friedman's book on this camera.
Jan 12, 2021 14:02:06 #
rlscholl
Loc: California
The Sony Alpha A7c appears to be a different solution for a travel camera. With a full-frame sensor in an A6600 (roughly) size body it’s compromise is tilted more toward image quality than its slightly smaller crop-sensor competitors, but is smaller than its full-frame competitors.
Jan 12, 2021 14:26:59 #
Jan 12, 2021 14:42:23 #
lyja17
Loc: hawaii
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)
fuji xt2 is an excellent camera. i would have it checked out but poor results with several lenses tell me the prob is not the camera.
but for a compact travel camera, I would suggest a lumix zx 200 that has an excellent zoom range.
Jan 12, 2021 14:42:47 #
An iPhone 12 proMax. It takes great stills in lower light conditions and shoots 4K video with hdr. It now records in pro raw that can be post processed with PS and Lightroom. Fits in your pocket and even works as a cell phone.
Jan 12, 2021 14:50:01 #
Dean37
Loc: Fresno, CA
There are many excellent suggestions for your carry anywhere camera. I like the one about finding out the real problem with the camera you already have. If not a free repair, or useage problem the repair would probably be cheaper than a new (to you) camera.
First you already own it.
Second it is considered to be an excellent camera for your purposes.
I have my own ideas for myself which include the cameras I already own. For what it's worth I like my Nikon P7800 as it emulates a good, maybe not great, dSLR in a small package. Not small enough for the pocket, but small. If I didn't have the Nikon P7800, I would certainly look at the Canon Bridge cameras, I think G12 is a good choice. In either you have a good zoom lens built in with a very useable range. Both do RAW if that is your choice.
First you already own it.
Second it is considered to be an excellent camera for your purposes.
I have my own ideas for myself which include the cameras I already own. For what it's worth I like my Nikon P7800 as it emulates a good, maybe not great, dSLR in a small package. Not small enough for the pocket, but small. If I didn't have the Nikon P7800, I would certainly look at the Canon Bridge cameras, I think G12 is a good choice. In either you have a good zoom lens built in with a very useable range. Both do RAW if that is your choice.
Jan 12, 2021 14:52:34 #
allan catt wrote:
Check out the Lumix range.
The Lumix models are similar to (not equal) the Sonys at a lower price. When I was down in the Virgin Isles I carried my Lumix DMC-ZS100. While it worked quite well, on occasion I wished I had a longer lens. The DMC-FZ1000 or DMC-FZ2500 (similar to Sony DMC-RX10 IV at a much lower price) would be a good choice. However, these are not as small as the pocket models.
Jan 12, 2021 14:56:14 #
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)
The A6+++ series with a lens is not a small travel camera.
Take a serious look at the Sony RX100's for a nice compact travel companion!
I'd recommend a Sony RX10 IV but it isn't a small travel camera even though I've taken the RX10 III or IV on most of my recent trips.
bwa
Jan 12, 2021 15:09:44 #
rfreudenheim wrote:
I have the Sony RX100 Mark 7 and am very satisfied with it. Its performance in very low light situations is not the absolute best, but otherwise the image quality is superb. It has a good reach (200mm) and once you get used to it, it is very easy to use. I do recommend buying the hard shell case for it, as it not only protects the camera but makes it easier to grip.
I have the RX100M2 for its very low light abilities and the RX100M7 for Everything else. Incredible little cameras! Highly Recommend!
Jan 12, 2021 15:18:16 #
Miami39 wrote:
I would like a recommendation for a lightweight tr... (show quote)
I started looking for a small travel camera about a year ago, as we had booked a March trip to Spain and a Med cruise in June. My primary requirements were excellent image quality, a viewfinder, ability to shoot RAW and a zoom range about the same as my primary DSLR "walking around" lens, a Canon 18-135 on my 80D. It came down to the Sony RX100 VII and the Canon G5X Mk II. I liked them both, and both have a 1" sensor (rumored to be the same one) and are virtually the same size. The Canon felt as or slightly more robust and had the zoom range I was looking for (24-120, less than the Sony, but fine for my purposes) and the color reproduction was the same as my Canon DSLR. The Canon was $300 less, but if it had been $200 more it wouldn't have made a difference in my choice. I bought the Canon in early February, COVID hit and both trips got cancelled. However, I've used the camera a lot and I'm very happy with it. If things go as they appear to be going, it will go with me on the re-booked Med cruise in 2022 and other places as well.
Jan 12, 2021 15:29:45 #
hj
Loc: Florida
Miami39 wrote:
The Sony sounds like a good idea. Thanks to the readers of UHH.
Don't discount the fact that some folks do not like the more complex Sony menu system.
Jan 12, 2021 19:59:42 #
pjalper
Loc: San Pedro Ca.
.....You'all heard it here.The demise of some of our "universe". Samy's camera, a a gold standard of photo shops, has closed their Culver City (LA) store. More to come?????
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.