chrissybabe wrote:
but assuming a mid range DSLR a pair of AS fittings is all he needs.
Quite rightly so you can't argue with physics but using a Manfrotto 625 is grossly overkill for his job. Actually for most jobs as it happens but that is my bias. Note here I said MOST not ALL.
Now, you are starting to think ! .......and your bias is recognized. I am not assuming anything, but recommending for large heavy equipment or, just to be ultra SAFE - which is the side I prefer to err on.
.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
chrissybabe wrote:
I would never equate a brick shithouse with a P&S camera. A brick shithouse is something very large and very heavy.
I would equate it with more like a large 4x5" camera using glass plates and including the flash pan.
Most pros and amateurs don't have LARGER stuff. My D850 with 600mm lens fits nicely into my gimbal and all supported on an average tripod via two sets of AS plates/clamps. Works fine and never felt the need to investigate anything more substantial.
Some pros might like to use RRS gear (and maybe a few rich amateurs) since they get a tax writeoff on it. And it is good BUT NOT necessary for most of us.
I would never equate a brick shithouse with a P&am... (
show quote)
I would always rent the big heavy stuff and have it delivered to the location. The client pays for that. So of course, it was easy to make the case for the best - Gitzo, Majestic, etc depending on what was going on top of it. No question that today I would be renting RRS or Promedia stuff.
BTW, I hope you took that tax writeoff on your camera and lens. Just asking for a friend . . .
Gene51 wrote:
......BTW, I hope you took that tax writeoff on your camera and lens. Just asking for a friend . . .
I am not a professional so cannot do that. Just a comment for all those on here who always suggest the most expensive stuff when somebody asks. Okay to say YOU use RRS but without a comment as to whether it is a tax writeoff the suggestions become way less useful to the average punter.
cjc2
Loc: Hellertown PA
imagemeister wrote:
As I have said before , due to the laws of physics, size matters - You all can use whatever YOU want -I will use what I want and try to explain to you why - and the why for me is physics. .......and, yes I use A/S for ALL other things - OTHER than tripod heads - which require more than what A/S has to offer - again according to my physics ! ....... Sorry to step on so many of your tiny toes here !
I do not need some internet guru/article or seller of equipment to try and tell me how good or bad something may or may not be when common sense and laws of physics are involved.
.
As I have said before , due to the laws of physics... (
show quote)
Due to the laws of physics, mechanics, and material science, the materials which make up the product are far more important than either size or weight. A rock is not always better than a stone.
[quote=cjc the materials which make up the product are far more important than either size or weight. [/quote]
"Far more important" - I think NOT - equally important - maybe..... Yes, I know this justifies paying RRS prices ......for some
.
I think you will find that RRS make theirs out of the same material ALL the rest do.
The weight is entirely dependent upon size, thickness etc. I doubt that RRS make theirs any different. Some manfs make their products with various holes in them to reduce the weight but it would be very unusual for this to reduce the rigidity.
That leaves size. This is important. I have clamps/plates from 25mm to 150mm used for different purposes.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.