Toment Loc: FL, IL

Rolling shutter??

no12mo

Now, that's very interesting. I didn't know you could do a double exposure on a digital camera. I don't do very much in the burst mode so I'm left totally confused. I'll read on to see what happened (I hope)

no12mo

Agree

cytafex Loc: Clarksburg MA

It is possible to do multiple exposures with digital.

lukevaliant Loc: gloucester city,n. j.

i think you nailed it,this happened to me{af-s}on,,set to af-c and viola

coolhanduke Loc: Redondo Beach, CA

Looks like it ran into tree shadows.

Lucian Loc: From Wales, living in Ohio

It is not shadows, it is simply a double exposure happening in the camera, it's quite obvious because shadows look completely different. You can see by the rest of the image that there clearly is no direct sunlight anywhere in the image so it is a high partly cloudy sky but looks early in the morning and the sun looks obscured by the cloud are of the sky in front of it, so you are just getting a flat light effect over the entire image. Therefore, no where that could give tree shadows, it is simply a double exposure. Check camera settings and look through other tree files, you may find that exact image somewhere else, of the tree branches you see showing through the body of the deer.

A double exposure will really only show up in the darker section of the other image, therefore anything in bright white snow will not show the second image, but any shadowed areas of snow have a darker tone, which allows the second image to show through. This is most definitely not a natural shadow on the deer, nor is it a reflection from glass right in front of the lens, in case you were shooting through a closed window, because the reflection would be far too close to the lens for it to ever possibly be remotely rendered as a sharp image.

Soul Dr. Loc: Beautiful Shenandoah Valley

I have to agree, it looks like most double exposure images I have seen. After examining all the photos that were downloaded, I can't see that these are reflections in the deer's fur.


will

Grahame Loc: Fiji

The deer's fur may have been wet.

As it came into the area where the stronger light through the trees hit it at the right angle this was possibly reflected back into the lens.

Hydro47 Loc: NW Indiana

I know. It's been a year already since my mystery "Camo deer" photos were posted. I went back to the scene of the original pictures. The day may have been a touch sunnier than the originals. Truck window open on the first pic with the lens at 70mm. You can clearly see my drivers side mirror at this extension. Zoom the lens out to 300 mm for the balance of these pictures. Now I can't see the edge of the mirror, but I am seeing some of the mirrors reflections in the lower right hand side of the picture. Shooting center point focus I am seeing the field where the deer was last year but the mirror isn't visible through the view finder. As I panned left to right, this has to be what caused the branches to show up on the deer. I still don't know why the images showede up on the deer and not the field. Look at the first shot showing that stick at about 11 o'clock in the mirror. Now look at the next picture...same stick only larger and no frame showing. Alright, I somehow managed to get the 2nd frame loaded first. Just reverse them in your minds

(Download)


(Download)