Canon L series Macro lens
Oct 30, 2020 11:27:33 #
I am looking for exactly that, a Canon L Series Macro lens.
If you have one in ideal condition, sitting in a box or lens case, and don't use it anymore, let me know what you would be asking.
Thanks guys and gals,
If you have one in ideal condition, sitting in a box or lens case, and don't use it anymore, let me know what you would be asking.
Thanks guys and gals,
Oct 30, 2020 14:18:14 #
There's two models / focal lengths, you might want to be more specific.
Oct 30, 2020 14:27:43 #
Point taken, thank you. I'm wanting to do some 1:1 captures, so I'm suspecting that the 100 mm 2.8 would serve my needs. I'm wanting to capture images I can use in my classroom teaching. I would be using this with my 5DII.
Oct 30, 2020 14:33:18 #
elliott937 wrote:
Point taken, thank you. I'm wanting to do some 1:1 captures, so I'm suspecting that the 100 mm 2.8 would serve my needs. I'm wanting to capture images I can use in my classroom teaching. I would be using this with my 5DII.
The 100mm is IS-enabled. So, depending on your subjects, it maybe the better option. I had the non L 100mm version, everywhere as good, except the accessories are all extra. If you're doing detailed work typically from a tripod, the non L version is a great option used, especially if you can get the hood and tripod collar bundled in the price. The 180mm is a great lens, the one I have now, but for sure a tripod tool.
Oct 30, 2020 14:40:32 #
Now this is going to make me sound like a total snob. I save long and hard, and so far I have three L lenses, which completes my wishes. The Macro would be more hobby used. At the current time, I have a Canon Compact-Macro 50mm. I'm passing three lasers through a gem to see what I can create. More for my usage than the classroom. I have found, in the past, that the L series creates a much sharper image than a non-L. And that is the only reason why I'm looking for a gently used L macro.
Oct 30, 2020 14:48:45 #
elliott937 wrote:
Now this is going to make me sound like a total snob. I save long and hard, and so far I have three L lenses, which completes my wishes. The Macro would be more hobby used. At the current time, I have a Canon Compact-Macro 50mm. I'm passing three lasers through a gem to see what I can create. More for my usage than the classroom. I have found, in the past, that the L series creates a much sharper image than a non-L. And that is the only reason why I'm looking for a gently used L macro.
You know I serve-up the most Canon propaganda on this site. Most of it is only real if you believe it. The tools are different with the IS-added, and the L lens having a more rugged build, but the images from two Canon 100mm macro lens with f/2.8 max apertures are identical. Your intended usage will determine the differences more than the image results.
Oct 30, 2020 15:15:25 #
I like how you say that you serve-up the most Canon propaganda on this site. Well, move over. While I do not post nearly as much as you do (my teaching gets in the way, said tongue in cheek for I love teaching), I check in this board every single day. And ever since the Canon 20D, I have been a very loyal member of the Pro-Canon Club. And thank for your feedback.
Oct 31, 2020 09:39:44 #
Oct 31, 2020 10:55:07 #
[quote=elliott937] I'm passing three lasers through a gem to see what I can create.
Just curious: How are you protecting your eyes?
Just curious: How are you protecting your eyes?
Oct 31, 2020 11:06:15 #
By very very carefully aiming. These three are so very fine aimed. But thank you for asking.
Oct 31, 2020 12:00:00 #
elliott937 wrote:
I like how you say that you serve-up the most Canon propaganda on this site. Well, move over. While I do not post nearly as much as you do (my teaching gets in the way, said tongue in cheek for I love teaching), I check in this board every single day. And ever since the Canon 20D, I have been a very loyal member of the Pro-Canon Club. And thank for your feedback.
But everyone is familiar with CHG CANON, and most respect HIS FREQUENT INPUT. Who are YOU, again??............ RJM
Oct 31, 2020 13:15:55 #
And I've ordered protective glasses for the range of laser light. I've always wanted to experiment with macro photography via laser light through gems.
Oct 31, 2020 14:30:19 #
Dwiggy
Loc: Dunedin, FL
CHG_CANON wrote:
You know I serve-up the most Canon propaganda on this site. Most of it is only real if you believe it. The tools are different with the IS-added, and the L lens having a more rugged build, but the images from two Canon 100mm macro lens with f/2.8 max apertures are identical. Your intended usage will determine the differences more than the image results.
CHG_CANON,
Thank you for the input. I have also been looking at the 100mm 2.8L Macro but you have convinced me that the non-L is just as good with a tripod. I use a tripod and so maybe I should be on the lookout for a non-L series? Thanks.
Oct 31, 2020 16:02:00 #
Hi, I have a Canon 100mm 1:2.8, IS, L Macro Lens that is like new. I haven't used it much since I bought a 100-400mm f/4-5.6 does does quite well with close ups. Not as good as the macro lens, but serves my purposes. Let me know if you are interested. kenpanck@aol.com
Nov 1, 2020 13:16:33 #
elliott937 wrote:
I like how you say that you serve-up the most Canon propaganda on this site. Well, move over.
It's not a contest.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.