Ugly Hedgehog® - Photography Forum
Infrared Images.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Mar 25, 2020 20:57:50   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
JeffDavidson wrote:
Well done.


Thank you very very much Jeff.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:21:29   #
LeeK Loc: Washington State
 
Very nice.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:39:12   #
lamiaceae Loc: Los Angeles Area, CA
 
blacks2 wrote:
These were taken with a infrared converted Lumix 7.2 megapixels.


Excellent IR images!

What filter is in your converted camera? You are getting fantastic B&W.

I have an IR converted Pentax K-100D (6.1 MP) with a 667nm filter. Produces false color IR. I would probably prefer a 750, 770, 800 filter to give me B&W IR more like the Kodak B&W IR film I used decades ago.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:50:01   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
yssirk123 wrote:
Very cool Mike!


Thank you very very much Bill.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:52:11   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
infocus wrote:
I have always loved infrared photography and these are the best I have ever seen. Just magnificent and worthy
of many awards I would think. Mike you have done it again.


Thank you very very much. I appreciate your kind comment if I deserve it or not.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:52:58   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
joehel2 wrote:
Wonderful set, Mike. Thanks for sharing them.


Thank you very very much Joe.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:56:57   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
lamiaceae wrote:
Excellent IR images!

What filter is in your converted camera? You are getting fantastic B&W.

I have an IR converted Pentax K-100D (6.1 MP) with a 667nm filter. Produces false color IR. I would probably prefer a 750, 770, 800 filter to give me B&W IR more like the Kodak B&W IR film I used decades ago.


Thank you very very much. I really don't know, I got the camera about 10 years ago in the local camera swap, and it was used.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 22:57:35   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
LeeK wrote:
Very nice.


Thank you very very much.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 01:21:45   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
blacks2 wrote:
These were taken with a infrared converted Lumix 7.2 megapixels.


I vote for #3. Truly unique. Great work!

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 09:41:46   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
aellman wrote:
I vote for #3. Truly unique. Great work!


Thank you very very much.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 10:09:42   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
blacks2 wrote:
These were taken with a infrared converted Lumix 7.2 megapixels.


Very lovely, Mike!

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 12:00:54   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
photophile wrote:
Very lovely, Mike!


Thank you very very much Karin.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 12:36:44   #
smf85 Loc: New York, NY
 
Very good infrared set. In particular I liked #2 and #3. All had good composition and exposure. What was the filter bandpass?

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 13:26:40   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
smf85 wrote:
Very good infrared set. In particular I liked #2 and #3. All had good composition and exposure. What was the filter bandpass?


Thank you very very much, I have no idea what that could be, I bought the camera 10 years ago in a camera swap used.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 22:13:03   #
smf85 Loc: New York, NY
 
blacks2 wrote:
Thank you very very much, I have no idea what that could be, I bought the camera 10 years ago in a camera swap used.


From the looks of I’d say 750nm-850nm (deep infrared).

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2020 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.