Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Camera Phones Performance
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
May 4, 2020 19:17:59   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
raypep wrote:
I travel a lot and carried a Nikon 7100 with a 200 telephoto lens. Loved the photos but not the weight after 5 - 6 hours out. Also, frustrated when somewhere on the trip without my camera and a great shot arose.
Repeating what others have said the best camera is the one you have with you. This is now true with my IPhone X sm which is always with me when I travel.
Also someone said asked what if DSLR cameras kept getting “better” in terms of technology, greater pixels, sharpness and other elements but / but no one could see these improvements.
I at first took shots with my Nikon and with my IPhone but when I saw the marginal differences, I started traveling with my Iphone exclusively.
I travel a lot and carried a Nikon 7100 with a 200... (show quote)


I assume you aren't trying technically difficult photography like sports or performance action in low light or birds in flight? I'd like to see a cell phone camera that could do those as well as a DSLR. If you are just doing snapshots, either will do.

Reply
Jul 10, 2022 20:05:49   #
rcirr Loc: Gilbert, Arizona
 
"The OP has been a member of UHH for seven years, but is still randomly selecting shooting mode? I don't think he intended this particular topic to be about learning ?" I can't believe how much people have read into this post. While I am not an award winning photographer, I do know my way around a camera. I do not randomly select shooting modes. Primarily, I use manual but use the other modes under certain circumstances. What I know and don't know isn't the question. Nor is the quality of my photographs. My point was the vast improvement of the phone cameras. I have seen some stunning images created by phone cameras. I was at a wedding where some extremely beautiful images were captured by a cell phone taken by a rather drunk individual. Obviously there are things I can do with my SLR that would be impossible with a phone camera. Controlling light and focus make for more interesting portraits. I have also taken quite a few very nice pictures with other people's phones. At social gatherings people who know me like the pictures I take and so they ask me to take pictures for them. The point is using a camera phone is much easier than using an SLR and the results are often excellent. My grandson's birthday party is a perfect example. The party was outside and since we live in "The Valley of the Sun" near Phoenix, the scene was well lit. My daughter took a shot of my grandson. Not only was the lighting, color and composition perfect but the picture had a beautiful bokea! In my original post I asked if the phone cameras had surpassed SLRs. While that question was tongue in cheek, the truth is phone cameras are gaining capabilities every day and dedicated cameras will always have superior capabilities to phone cameras. The point is, the situations requiring those superior capabilities will be fewer and fewer!

Reply
Jul 10, 2022 20:31:08   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
n3eg wrote:
Once again...a cellphone with a camera is a spork. It does multiple things, and none of them well.


When you say does "none of them well", if you are referring to smartphones in general and not just the camera, you may need to learn more on the subject. Smartphones do hundreds and hundreds of things extremely well.

As far as the best cell phone cameras are concerned they are quite capable given the extent of the hardware and lenses. They certainly do not currently replace the best cameras and lenses, but in the right hands the results can be spectacular.

Reply
 
 
Jul 10, 2022 21:06:57   #
rcirr Loc: Gilbert, Arizona
 
mwsilvers wrote:
When you say does "none of them well", if you are referring to smartphones in general and not just the camera, you may need to learn more on the subject. Smartphones do hundreds and hundreds of things extremely well.

As far as the best cell phone cameras are concerned they are quite capable given the extent of the hardware and lenses. They certainly do not currently replace the best cameras and lenses, but in the right hands the results can be spectacular.


You are one hundred percent correct! Well put!

Reply
Jul 11, 2022 02:30:33   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
ralf wrote:
Did you ever try to print a phone pic bigger than 4x6?
I agree that phones get amazing results considering the hardware limitations (tiny sensor, tiny lens), but it ain't the same thing. Phones get snapshots. DSLR's are capable of much more.


Once upon a time that was important, but today a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of captured images get printed. Everything else is viewed on a monitor of some type.

Reply
Jul 11, 2022 02:34:52   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
aellman wrote:
Agreed. Here's another one from the earlier iPhone that didn't require the creative controls of a "real" camera.

Scituate, MA. August 2016. iPhone SE.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.