As promised in an earlier thread,
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-610782-1.html,
the comparison among techniques for backing up image /video files from a camera's SD cards without a laptop is completed, for now. In order to share this information with anyone interested, and to incorporate any additional inputs, it is attached to this thread as an Excel comparison spreadsheet, which references 4 annotated photos. This effort has been a challenge to maintain apples-to-apples and because new products and reviews, referenced in the spreadsheet, appear almost every day. Many are You-Tube videos, which seem to have lots of duplication and usually don't reference each other. But each adds new info, a different work flow, equipment, and viewpoint. Some offer a discount code. Some reviewers changed their minds, so look at the latest. Many are for older versions that are not listed in the spreadsheet.
The first tab covers Hubs for use in Multi-Box solutions, which tend to be very low-cost. I already had or bought the hardware for 3 of these and ran some experiments to measure copy speed from SD to SSD, which generally agree with those posted in the reviews. Without repeating here all of the detail in the spreadsheet, here are some overall conclusions.
1. Copy speed from SD to SSD varies from about 8 MB/s, with an old. slow SD card, to 12-16 MB/s with a SanDisk SD claimed to read at 170 MB/s (amazingly faster than the UHS-I limit of 104 MB/s), given the proper SanDisk reader.
2. The Kingston Mobillite (Hub2) and an IOS scheme (Hub6) were only 1-5 MB/s, tested by others. Hub6 is likely to improve.
3. Hub1 (RAVPOWER File Hub) and Hub2 have a built-in Battery, so can also serve as a power store.
4. Hub1 and 2 have wi-fi and can be controlled from a smart phone app (Android or IOS), while 3-5 need a file manager running on Android with OTG USB, but there is an IOS capability emerging (Hub6).
5. Practice to be sure you can handle basic file management techniques like creating and naming folders, copying and deleting files, ejecting drives, etc.
6. Hubs 7 and 8 did not work from my Android phone; they don't seem to support OTG USB.
7. At the bottom of the first tab are some results showing that internal to the Note8 or MacBook pro, i.e. not through USB, the transfer rates jump to 40 and 80 MB/Sec respectively. Data needs to pass port-to-port in both directions while write speed is usually slower, so using a USB hub would seem to limit speed to less than half of these internal speeds, (20 MB/s for the phone) as observed.
The second tab includes a list of some SSDs of various sizes. I own only the 2TB SanDisk Extreme, which was used in all speed measurements. I wish it had an activity indicator LED and a write protect switch. There is also a couple of 2.5" SATA internal drives, which seem to be a bit cheaper and could be used with a USB adaptor or within the NEXTO Single Box Solution SB3.
Finally, the second tab also lists four Single Box Solutions, which are all faster, bigger, heavier, much more than just storage, and far more expensive than the Multi-Box solutions. The NEXTO DI NPS-10 (SB3) and Gnarbox 2.0 (SB4) even support dual write to their internal SSD plus an external SSD, forming a sort of RAID1 configuration (no longer Single-Box). I don't own any of these, so the performance numbers in the spreadsheet are all by the various references. All of them have incremental write, so you can leave images on your SD cards as yet another form of backup, without slowing down as they fill up.
The LaCie DJO Co-Pilot (SB1) is the least expensive, likely because it has a spinning hard drive. It will probably be available with SSD in the future. The NEXTO DI NPS-10 (SB3) comes without any drive, but has a slot for a 2.5" SATA drive, which can be replaced as technology advances and your needs grow. It also comes with UHS-II SD slots, supporting their faster speeds. The Gnarbox 2.0 (SB4) has the newer NVMe SSD technology, but so far maxes out at 1TB.
Overall, except for Hub6, no reviewers addressed the need to EJECT (unmount) the SSD when done. This can be important to avoid corrupting the SSD, which happened to me during experiments. I was able to repair it using Disk Utility on my MacBookPro, but the whole point of this study is to avoid dragging it to Antarctica. You can EJECT via Android settings or via most file managers, or just wait until you are absolutely sure the SSD is not being accessed.
The 3 schemes i tested don't weigh much and offer some diversity, thus will all be going to Antarctica in December. Eliminating the weight of the MacBook Pro and charging/interface parephernalia will likely allow for one more big lens. And I won't be staying up late post processing. The phone is also a backup camera itself and can also collect images from my D7500 via Snap Bridge, another form of backup. I will get a 0.5TB microSD card or maybe even a new S10+.
I hope you find this comparison useful or at least somewhat interesting. Comments, corrections, observations, your personal experiences, or additional schemes will be welcome and i will revise the spreadsheet to accommodate them as necessary. Thanks.