Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why do folks buy third party lenses?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 15 next> last>>
Aug 21, 2019 13:09:53   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Longshadow wrote:
Oh, sorry...


All in a days work!

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 13:18:21   #
Retired CPO Loc: Travel full time in an RV
 
I shop carefully and read reviews from reliable sources when looking for a lens. I don't buy cheap and I want high quality but, in my humble opinion, OEM Nikon lenses with a few exceptions, are obscenely expensive. I recently bought a Tokina 11-16 f2.8 ATX PRO. Fairly expensive lens in my mind but much less expensive than the nearest Nikon equivalent. And has better reviews. It's an outstanding lens and I wouldn't trade it straight across for a Nikon.
I did buy the f5.6 200-to-500mm Nikon and it's well worth the money, great lens for a reasonable price. I also have the Nikon f2.8 105mm macro. Very nice lens but if I had been smarter I would have bought a third party lens, saved some money and still had a very nice lens.
Bottom line...I'm not interested in impressing anyone with my gear, I will let my photographs speak for themselves. And money is ALWAYS an issue.

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 13:29:42   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Fredrick wrote:
Why buy lenses from let’s say Tamron or Sigma, as opposed to OEM lenses from the camera manufacturer? Wouldn’t Nikon lenses for Nikon cameras or Canon lenses for Canon cameras, etc. be better in general than third party lenses?

If cost is the main issue, wouldn’t a used OEM lens in excellent condition be better in general than a new third party lens? I guess used third party lenses still beat out used OEM lenses cost wise.

I understand that Tamron and Sigma lenses are popular. Just curious as to why?
Why buy lenses from let’s say Tamron or Sigma, as ... (show quote)


Because, sometimes, the thrid party makes the better lens. For instance 50mm 1.4 lenses. First is the Sigma 50mm 1.4 Art lens then the Zeiss Mivus and then the OEM.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2019 13:36:04   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
I have always bought Nikon glass for my Nikon bodies. No doubt, I could be missing something, but it is is safe.
I have been tempted with the Art lenses, but have not YET gone down that road.

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 13:37:22   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
Fredrick wrote:
Why buy lenses from let’s say Tamron or Sigma, as opposed to OEM lenses from the camera manufacturer? Wouldn’t Nikon lenses for Nikon cameras or Canon lenses for Canon cameras, etc. be better in general than third party lenses?

If cost is the main issue, wouldn’t a used OEM lens in excellent condition be better in general than a new third party lens? I guess used third party lenses still beat out used OEM lenses cost wise.

I understand that Tamron and Sigma lenses are popular. Just curious as to why?
Why buy lenses from let’s say Tamron or Sigma, as ... (show quote)


Because some are lenses the camera makers don't have in the lineup.
Because some of them are Excellent lens.
Because they are usually less money.

Because Tamron, Sigma, Samyang etc often make lenses or components for the OEMs like Nikon and Sigma. Plus some of the big European names are made at least in part by the Japanese lens makers.

You don't like them, don't buy them.

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 13:40:41   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
I am a Nikon shooter that likes the Nikon lenses, but I have been very pleased with the Tamron 150-600 G2 and slightly prefer the Nikon 200-500 for active wildlife. My Sig 1.4 35mm Art is a favorite.

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 13:47:41   #
nadelewitz Loc: Ithaca NY
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
I have always bought Nikon glass for my Nikon bodies. No doubt, I could be missing something, but it is is safe.
I have been tempted with the Art lenses, but have not YET gone down that road.


You have said this before.
What is "unsafe" about a third-party lens that prevents you from considering it?

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2019 16:55:46   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
DaveO wrote:
Why do folks take their car to private businesses for maintenance???


What am I missing here?

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 16:58:35   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
What am I missing here?


Nothing, it was a joke...

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 16:59:40   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
What am I missing here?

Same thing I did...
Humor.

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 17:00:39   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
nadelewitz wrote:
You have said this before.
What is "unsafe" about a third-party lens that prevents you from considering it?


Compatibility with the newest bodies is a potential issue, not that I know of anyone who has had issues. And my Nikkor 70-300 is not reverse compatible with my D300s, so I guess nothing is perfect.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2019 17:00:43   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
What am I missing here?


You missed an analogy that would produce some similar responses that could be a reasonable thought for the OP to consider.

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 17:01:15   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
Longshadow wrote:
Same thing I did...
Humor.


OK, I'll buy that. Thanks!

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 17:02:06   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
OK, I'll buy that. Thanks!


LOL! I would seek some more third party responses!

Reply
Aug 21, 2019 17:02:24   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
DaveO wrote:
You missed an analogy that would produce some similar responses that could be a reasonable thought for the OP to consider.


Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.